
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Connelly, J.B. 
T1  - Mode of emplacement of Papuan Ultramafic Belt
JF  - Exploration Geophysics
JO  - Explor. Geophys.
Y1  - 1978
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
SP  - 87
EP  - 88
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/EG978087 
N2  - The Papgan Ultramafic Belt (Figure 1A) is one of the best preserved peridotite?gabbro?basalt complexes in the world. The Belt is considered to be an over-thrust sheet of oceanic crust and mantle with a thicker than normal oceanic crust. Earlier workers have described the overthrust as resulting from north?south compression produced by the northwards movement of the Australian Plate, and a northeasterly dip is indicated by: (a) the sequence of rock types; ultramafic rocks at the base overlain to the northeast by gabbroic rocks which are in turn overlain by ocean basalts; (b) a gravity high offset northeast of the main out-crop of ultramafic rock, indicates the presence of dense rock at shallow depth to the northeast. The age of formation of the complex is regarded as Jurassic or Cretaceous, and overthrusting occurred some time before the Miocene when shallow water tuffs and agglomerates were deposited on the Belt. The Belt is cut by one major left-lateral fault and several smaller ones. Reversal of the movement along these faults (Figure 1B) suggests that the Belt was originally aligned north?south. Theoretical cross-sections of the Belt in its present configuration were constructed by assuming that it originally dipped at a shallow angle to the east and was subsequently sheared along north west-trending strike-slip faults. The computed gravity and magnetic anomalies over these theoretical cross sections match the observed anomalies closely. Only small changes in the model are required to produce an acceptable final fit. The good agreement between the theoretical and computed cross sections support the idea that the Belt when originally emplaced had a north?south strike. 
ER  -

