Predicting lightning sourced electromagnetic fields
Lachlan Hennessy 1 2 James Macnae 11 RMIT University, School of Science, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic. 3001, Australia.
2 Corresponding author. Email: hennessylachlan@gmail.com
Exploration Geophysics 49(4) 425-433 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG16163
Submitted: 31 December 2016 Accepted: 25 May 2017 Published: 1 August 2017
Abstract
Sferics used in audio-frequency magnetotellurics (AMT) for shallow conductivity-depth soundings (up to 400 m in a 1000 Ωm half-space at 1.5 kHz) are detected by global lightning networks, which catalogue the time and location of up to four million lightning strikes per day. Passive AMT surveys do not use source information, but rather assume that global lightning activity provides sufficient signal if data are acquired for long enough. This assumption not only limits survey productivity, but can also result in poor signal-to-noise ratios (S/N), particularly at dead-band frequencies (1.5–5 kHz). To increase S/N and survey productivity, we used lightning network data as a proxy for direct measurement of sferic source information. We carried out a Global Positioning System (GPS) synchronised AMT survey, and for each lightning strike in the catalogue we modelled earth-ionosphere waveguide propagation to accurately predict arrival time for every predicted sferic in our time series data. We extracted a window of data around each predicted sferic and stored these time series into a structured database with associated lightning network data, such as lightning peak current, polarity and geographical coordinates. Two examples from our sferic database show that lightning network data are accurate enough to predict amplitude and polarisation of sferics at our survey site. For large lightning peak current, we observed a strong correlation between source proximity and increased S/N, particularly at dead-band frequencies, which often correlate to induction scales pertinent to mineral exploration. Our findings establish an interconnected relationship between lightning network data and lightning sourced fields, introducing known source AMT.
Key words: electromagnetics, lightning, magnetotellurics.
References
Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A., 1964, Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables: Courier Corporation.Auger, F., Flandrin, P., Gonçalvès, P., and Lemoine, O., 1996, Time-frequency toolbox: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Chave, A. D., and Jones, A. G., 2012, The magnetotelluric method: theory and practice: Cambridge University Press.
Christian, H. J., Blakeslee, R. J., Boccippio, D. J., Boeck, W. L., Buechler, D. E., Driscoll, K. T., Goodman, S. J., Hall, J. M., Koshak, W. J., Mach, D. M., and Stewart, M. F., 2003, Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108, ACL 4–1–ACL 4–15
| Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chronis, T., Koshak, W., and McCaul, E., 2016, Why do oceanic negative cloud-to-ground lightning exhibit larger peak current values?: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121, 4049–4068
| Why do oceanic negative cloud-to-ground lightning exhibit larger peak current values?:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cummins, K. L., and Murphy, M. J., 2009, An overview of lightning locating systems: history, techniques, and data uses, with an in-depth look at the US NLDN: IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 51, 499–518
| An overview of lightning locating systems: history, techniques, and data uses, with an in-depth look at the US NLDN:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garcia, X., and Jones, A. G., 2002, Atmospheric sources for audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) sounding: Geophysics, 67, 448–458
| Atmospheric sources for audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) sounding:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garcia, X., and Jones, A. G., 2005, A new methodology for the acquisition and processing of audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) data in the AMT dead band: Geophysics, 70, G119–G126
| A new methodology for the acquisition and processing of audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) data in the AMT dead band:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Groom, R. W., and Bailey, R. C., 1989, Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three‐dimensional galvanic distortion: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 94, 1913–1925
| Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three‐dimensional galvanic distortion:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hope, M., and Andersson, S., 2016, The discovery and geophysical response of the Atlántida Cu–Au porphyry deposit, Chile: Exploration Geophysics, 47, 237–247
| The discovery and geophysical response of the Atlántida Cu–Au porphyry deposit, Chile:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XhsVOit7%2FL&md5=ac9d5a6ccf3071fe853be231118cfd47CAS |
Hu, X., Peng, R., Wu, G., Wang, W., Huo, G., and Han, B., 2013, Mineral exploration using CSAMT data: application to Longmen region metallogenic belt, Guangdong Province, China: Geophysics, 78, B111–B119
| Mineral exploration using CSAMT data: application to Longmen region metallogenic belt, Guangdong Province, China:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huang, E., Williams, E., Boldi, R., Heckman, S., Lyons, W., Taylor, M., Nelson, T., and Wong, C., 1999, Criteria for sprites and elves based on Schumann resonance observations: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104, 16943–16964
| Criteria for sprites and elves based on Schumann resonance observations:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ishaq, M., and Jones, D. L., 1977, Method of obtaining radiowave propagation parameters for the Earth-ionosphere duct at ELF: Electronics Letters, 13, 254–255
| Method of obtaining radiowave propagation parameters for the Earth-ionosphere duct at ELF:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Karney, C. F. F., 2013, Algorithms for geodesics: Journal of Geodesy, 87, 43–55
| Algorithms for geodesics:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Legault, J. M., Wijns, C., Izarra, C., and Plastow, G., 2016, The Balboa ZTEM Cu-Mo-Au porphyry discovery at Cobre Panama: 25th ASEG International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 361–366.
Macnae, J., 2012, Design and testing of ARMIT magnetic field sensors for EM systems: 22nd ASEG Geophysical Conference, Extended Abstracts, 1–4.
Neukirch, M., and Garcia, X., 2014, Nonstationary magnetotelluric data processing with instantaneous parameter: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119, 1634–1654
| Nonstationary magnetotelluric data processing with instantaneous parameter:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nickolaenko, A. P., and Hayakawa, M., 2002, Resonances in the Earth-ionosphere cavity: Springer Science & Business Media.
Nickolaenko, A. P., Hayakawa, M., and Hobara, Y., 2010, Q-bursts: natural ELF radio transients: Surveys in Geophysics, 31, 409–425
| Q-bursts: natural ELF radio transients:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rakov, V. A., and Uman, M. A., 2003, Lightning: physics and effects: Cambridge University Press.
Said, R., and Murphy, M., 2016, GLD360 upgrade: performance analysis and applications: 24th International Lightning Detection Conference & 6th International Lightning Meteorology Conference, San Diego, California, 18–21 April 2016, 1–8.
Said, R. K., Inan, U. S., and Cummins, K. L., 2010, Long-range lightning geolocation using a VLF radio atmospheric waveform bank: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 115, D23108
Said, R. K., Cohen, M. B., and Inan, U. S., 2013, Highly intense lightning over the oceans: estimated peak currents from global GLD360 observations: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118, 6905–6915
| Highly intense lightning over the oceans: estimated peak currents from global GLD360 observations:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sato, M., Takahashi, Y., Yoshida, A., and Adachi, T., 2008, Global distribution of intense lightning discharges and their seasonal variations: Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 41, 234011
| Global distribution of intense lightning discharges and their seasonal variations:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smiarowski, A., and Macnae, J., 2013, Detection of a perfect conductor with an airborne electromagnetic system: The Gemini Field Test: Geophysics, 78, E249–E259
| Detection of a perfect conductor with an airborne electromagnetic system: The Gemini Field Test:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Szarka, L., 1988, Geophysical aspects of man-made electromagnetic noise in the earth – a review: Surveys in Geophysics, 9, 287–318
| Geophysical aspects of man-made electromagnetic noise in the earth – a review:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomson, D. J., 1982, Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis: Proceedings of the IEEE, 70, 1055–1096
| Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ushio, T., Wu, T., and Yoshida, S., 2015, Review of recent progress in lightning and thunderstorm detection techniques in Asia: Atmospheric Research, 154, 89–102
| Review of recent progress in lightning and thunderstorm detection techniques in Asia:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wait, J., 1991, Diffraction of VLF radio waves by polar ice caps: Electronics Letters, 27, 1030–1032
| Diffraction of VLF radio waves by polar ice caps:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wait, J., 2012, Geo-electromagnetism: Elsevier.