Regional TEMPEST survey in north-east Namibia
Geoffrey Peters 1 4 Gregory Street 2 Ivor Kahimise 3 David Hutchins 31 International Geoscience Pty Ltd, 8 May Avenue, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia.
2 Tin Htay International Pty Ltd, 37A Harvey Street, Mosman Park, WA 6012, Australia.
3 Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy, 1 Aviation Road Private Bag 13297, Windhoek, Namibia.
4 Corresponding author. Email: gpeters@intergeo.com.au
Exploration Geophysics 46(1) 27-35 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14022
Submitted: 6 March 2014 Accepted: 19 June 2014 Published: 9 September 2014
Abstract
A regional scale TEMPEST208 airborne electromagnetic survey was flown in north-east Namibia in 2011. With broad line spacing (4 km) and a relatively low-powered, fixed-wing system, the approach was intended to provide a regional geo-electric map of the area, rather than direct detection of potential mineral deposits.
A key component of the geo-electric profiling was to map the relative thickness of the Kalahari sediments, which is up to 200 m thick and obscures most of the bedrock in the area. Knowledge of the thickness would allow explorers to better predict the costs of exploration under the Kalahari. An additional aim was to determine if bedrock conductors were detectable beneath the Kalahari cover.
The system succeeded in measuring the Kalahari thickness where this cover was relatively thin and moderately conductive. Limitations in depth penetration mean that it is not possible to map the thickness in the centre of the survey area, and much of the northern half of the survey area. Additional problems arise due to the variable conductivity of the Kalahari cover. Where the conductivity of the Kalahari sediment is close to that of the basement, there is no discernable contrast to delineate the base of the Kalahari.
Basement conductors are visible beneath the more thinly covered areas such as in the north-west and south of the survey area. The remainder of the survey area generally comprises deeper, more conductive cover and for the most part basement conductors cannot be detected.
A qualitative comparison with VTEM data shows comparable results in terms of regional mapping, and suggests that even more powerful systems such as the VTEM may not detect discrete conductors beneath the thick conductive parts of the Kalahari cover.
Key words: airborne, conductivity, Damara, electromagnetic, Kalahari, Namibia.
References
Brodie, R. C., and Fisher, A., 2008, Inversion of TEMPEST AEM survey data – Honeysuckle Creek, Victoria: Geoscience Australia report for the Bureau of Rural Sciences project ‘Salinity Mapping – Geophysics’. Available at http://data.daff.gov.au/data/warehouse/pe_ga99010666/HSK_Inversion_Report.pdfEmerson, D. W., 1997, Effects of water salinity and saturation on the electrical resistivity of clays: Preview, , 19–23
Finn, M., Cameron, B., and Hutchins, D. G., 2010, Namibia AEM mapping: a case study of airborne EM data used as a geological mapping and interpretation toll: ASEG Extended Abstracts 2010, 1–4.
Fugro, 2012, Geological survey of Namibia large scale airborne TDEM mapping over NE Namibia – TEMPEST208 case study: Fugro Airborne Surveys, South Africa.
Fullagar Geophysics, 2012, Vpem1D. Available at http://www.fullagargeophysics.com
Lane, R., Green, A., Golding, C., Owers, M., Pik, P., Plunkett, C., Sattel, D., and Thorn, B., 2000, An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 162–172
| An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lane, R., Brodie, R., and Fitzpatrick, A., 2004a, Constrained inversion of AEM data from the Lower Balonne area, Southern Queensland, Australia: US Geological Survey Open-file Report 163, Cooperative Research Centre for Landscapes, Environment and Mineral Exploration.
Lane, R., Brodie, R., and Fitzpatrick, A., 2004b, A revised inversion model parameter formulation for fixed wing transmitter loop-towed bird receiver coil time-domain airborne electromagnetic data: ASEG Extended Abstracts, Volume 2004 (1), 1–4.
Ley-Cooper, Y. A., Munday, T., 2013, Inversion of TEMPEST208 airborne electromagnetic data: CSIRO Report.
Sattel, D., and Kgotlhang, L., 2004, Groundwater exploration with AEM in the Boteti area, Botswana: Exploration Geophysics, 35, 147–156
Thomas, D. S. G., and Shaw, P. A., 1990, The deposition and development of the Kalahari Group sediments, Central Southern Africa: Journal of African Earth Sciences (and the Middle East), 10, 187–197
| The deposition and development of the Kalahari Group sediments, Central Southern Africa:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |