Modelling the superparamagnetic response of AEM data
Daniel Sattel 1 4 Paul Mutton 2 31 EM Solutions LLC, 1101 Illinois Street, Golden, CO 80401, USA.
2 Southern Geoscience Consultants, Level 1, 183 Great Eastern Highway, Belmont, WA 6104, Australia.
3 Current address: Touchstone Geophysics, 4 Collins Road, Roleystone, WA 6111, Australia.
4 Corresponding author. Email: dsattel@comcast.net
Exploration Geophysics 46(1) 118-129 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG14005
Submitted: 23 January 2014 Accepted: 26 May 2014 Published: 11 September 2014
Abstract
Several lines of VTEM data flown at different system elevations across a known sulphide body and surface cover with elevated superparamagnetic (SPM) properties were analysed with MAXWELL, layered-earth inversions (LEI), LEROIAIR and LEROI. The SPM material was modelled with frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibilities at shallow depth.
Due to their slow late-time decay, SPM responses can be confused with responses of deep conductors and vice versa. Depending on the parameter weighting used, 1D inversions model all late-time responses as deep conductive material or as surficial SPM material. However, the joint 1D inversion of data acquired at different system elevations manages to recover a deep conductor from the sulphide anomaly and elevated SPM values at the location of the SPM response. For the modelled parameters, the VTEM datasets from two elevations (at 70 and 80 m) require a vertical separation of ~10 m to allow for the discrimination between the SPM and sulphide responses. For lower system elevations, less sensor separation is necessary due to the strong gradient of the SPM response.
Following the determination of SPM parameters from VTEM survey data, these values were used to hypothesise the SPM response for a range of system geometries, showing that larger transmitter loops and larger offsets between transmitter and receiver loops reduce SPM effects. We suggest that two vertically separated receivers could be used to measure the airborne electromagnetic (AEM) gradient and depending on the flying height of the transmitter, the vertical offset of the receivers should be between 2 and 40 m. If gradient data are not collected, then EM responses measured during the transmitter on-time and x-component data, if available, might offer some model discrimination.
Whereas synthetic data of the examined helicopter TEM systems VTEM, AEROTEM and HELITEM indicate a fairly high sensitivity to SPM effects, fixed-wing MEGATEM data are much less affected, due to the higher transmitter elevation and large transmitter loop – receiver separation. SPM effects on data of frequency-domain systems such as the RESOLVE system are also small.
Key words: airborne electromagnetics, EM data modelling, EM gradiometer, inversion, superparamagnetism.
References
Barsukov, P. O., and Fainberg, E. B., 2001, Superparamagnetic effect over gold and nickel deposits: European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 6, 61–72Billings, S., Pasion, L., Oldenburg, D., and Foley, J., 2003, The influence of magnetic viscosity on electromagnetic sensors: Proceedings of EUDEM-SCOT2, International Conference on Requirements and Technologies for the Detection, Removal and Neutralization of Landmines and UXO.
Buselli, G., 1982, The effect of near-surface paramagnetic material on electromagnetic measurements: Geophysics, 47, 1315–1324
| The effect of near-surface paramagnetic material on electromagnetic measurements:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Constable, S. C., Parker, R. L., and Constable, C. G., 1987, Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data: Geophysics, 52, 289–300
| Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cross, G., and Das, Y., 2013, Influence of dispersive soil electromagnetic properties on hand-held TDEM sensors: Geophysical Prospecting, 61, 658–677
| Influence of dispersive soil electromagnetic properties on hand-held TDEM sensors:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doll, W. E., Gamey, T. J., Holladay, J. S., Sheehan, J. R., Norton, J., Beard, L. P., Lee, J. L. C., Hanson, A. E., and Lahti, R. M., 2010, Results of a high-resolution airborne TEM system demonstration for unexploded ordnance detection: Geophysics, 75, B211–B220
| Results of a high-resolution airborne TEM system demonstration for unexploded ordnance detection:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Duncan, A. C., 1987, Interpretation of down-hole transient EM data using current filaments: Exploration Geophysics, 18, 36–39
| Interpretation of down-hole transient EM data using current filaments:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Groom, R. W., Hyde, C. H., and Lajoie, J., 1996, A case study on the application of the EMIGMA modelling package in interpretation of UTEM data over the Cominco Cerattepe deposit in Turkey: 66th International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 596–599.
Igel, J., Preetz, H., Takahashi, K., and Loewer, M., 2013, Landmine and UXO detection using EMI and GPR – limitations due to the influence of the soil: First Break, 31, 43–51
Kratzer, T., Macnae, J., and Mutton, P., 2013, Detection and correction of SPM effects in airborne EM surveys: Exploration Geophysics, 44, 6–15
| Detection and correction of SPM effects in airborne EM surveys:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lee, T., 1984, The transient electromagnetic response of a magnetic or superparamagnetic ground: Geophysics, 49, 854–860
| The transient electromagnetic response of a magnetic or superparamagnetic ground:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lee, J. B., 2010, Feasibility of in-phase airborne TEM utilising gradient measurements: 21st International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, ASEG, Extended Abstracts.
McNeill, J. D., 2013, The magnetic susceptibility of soils is definitely complex: Technical Note TN-36, Geonics Limited.
Meglich, T., Li, Y., Pasion, L., Oldenburg, D., VanDam, R. L., and Billings, S., 2008, Characterization of frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility in UXO electromagnetic geophysics: 78th International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1248–1252.
Mutton, P., 2012, Superparamagnetic effects in EM surveys for mineral exploration: 22nd International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, ASEG, Extended Abstracts.
Mutton, P., and Mortimer, R., 2009, Superparamagnetic effects in airborne EM survey data: 20th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, ASEG, Extended Abstracts.
Pasion, L. R., Billings, S. D., and Oldenburg, D., 2002, Evaluating the effects of magnetic soils on TEM measurements for UXO detection: 72nd International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1428–1431.
Raiche, A., 2004, Practical 3D airborne EM inversion in complex terranes: 17th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, ASEG, Extended Abstracts.
Sattel, D., 1998, Improving conductivity models using on-time EM data: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 605–608
| Improving conductivity models using on-time EM data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sattel, D., 2000, The effect of magnetic anomalies on transient electromagnetic data: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 140–149
| The effect of magnetic anomalies on transient electromagnetic data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sattel, D., 2006, A brief discussion of helicopter time-domain systems: 18th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, ASEG, Extended Abstracts.
Sattel, D., and Macnae, J. C., 2001, The feasibility of electromagnetic gradiometer measurements: Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 309–320
| The feasibility of electromagnetic gradiometer measurements:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smiarowski, A., and Macnae, J., 2013, Detection of a perfect conductor with an airborne electromagnetic system: The Gemini Field Test: Geophysics, 78, E249–E259
| Detection of a perfect conductor with an airborne electromagnetic system: The Gemini Field Test:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith, R. S., 2013, Using combinations of spatial gradients to improve the detectability of buried conductors below or within conductive material: Geophysics, 78, E19–E31
| Using combinations of spatial gradients to improve the detectability of buried conductors below or within conductive material:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spies, B. R., and Frischknecht, F. C., 1991, Electromagnetic sounding, in M. N. Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: SEG, 2, 285–425.
Tabbagh, A., and Dabas, M., 1996, Absolute magnetic viscosity determination using time-domain electromagnetic devices: Archaeological Prospection, 3, 199–208
| Absolute magnetic viscosity determination using time-domain electromagnetic devices:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walker, S., and Rudd, J., 2008, Advanced processing of helicopter TEM data: Proceedings of the AEM 2008 Conference.
Ward, S. H., and Hohmann, G. W., 1987, Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications, in M. N. Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: SEG, 1, 131–311.