Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Stochastic simulation of fracture strikes using seismic anisotropy induced velocity anomalies

Samik Sil 1 2 4 Sanjay Srinivasan 3
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Geophysics, J.J. Pickle Research Campus, Bldg. 196, 10100 Burnet Road (R2200), Austin, TX 78758-4445, USA.

2 Present address: Conoco Phillips, PO BOX 2197, Houston, TX 77252-2197, USA.

3 Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C0300, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

4 Corresponding author. Email: samiksil@gmail.com

Exploration Geophysics 40(3) 257-264 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08129
Submitted: 30 April 2009  Published: 21 September 2009

Abstract

Availability of a fracture map of a producing reservoir aids in increasing productivity. Generally, accurate information related to fracture orientation is only available at a few sparse well log locations. However, fractures introduce velocity anomalies in seismic data by making the medium azimuthally anisotropic. When multi-azimuth data is available then it is possible to map the fracture attributes in the entire reservoir zone by analysing the anisotropy induced velocity anomalies in the seismic data. In the absence of 3D data, seismic anisotropy induced velocity anomaly from 2D data (as fracture strikes are not constant and data contains multi-azimuthal effect even when it is 2D) can still be used as a secondary source of information for the purpose of fracture strike simulation. To validate the above hypothesis, fracture strike information in a reservoir from the Mexican part of the Gulf of Mexico is derived using Markov-Bayes stochastic simulation. In this simulation process, accurate well log derived fracture information is used as hard or primary data and seismic velocity anomaly/uncertainty based fracture information is used as soft or secondary data. The Markov-Bayes Stochastic simulation provides multiple realisations of the fracture patterns and thus helps to estimate the uncertainty associated with the fracture strikes of the reservoir. Accuracy of the simulation process is also estimated and the simulation result is compared with simple and ordinary kriging methods of fracture strike simulation.

Key words: fracture, geostatistics, Markov-Bayes, seismic anisotropy, stochastic simulation.


Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the editor Lindsay Thomas and Vinay Vaidya of Exploration Geophysics for their help. We are also thankful to Dr Ravi P. Srivastava and Dr Abhijit Gangopadhya for their constructive criticism and suggestions which made this manuscript better. This work is a part of the reservoir model uncertainty estimation project conducted by the petroleum engineering department of UT Austin with funding received from G&W Systems.


References

Angerer, E., Lanfranchi, P., and Rogers, S. F., 2003, Fractured reservoir modeling from seismic to simulator, A reality? Leading Edge 22, 684–689.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Deo M. D. , and Morgan C. D. , 1998, Increased oil production and reserves from improved completion technique in the Bluebell field, Uinta Basin: http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/servlets/purl/2208-rrFGBi/webviewable/2208.PDF (accessed 29 September 2008).

Deutsch C. , and Journel A. , 1998, GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide: Oxford University Press.

Dix, C. H., 1955, Seismic velocities from surface measurements: Geophysics 20, 68–86.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Gotway C. A. , and Rutherford B. M. , 1994, Stochastic simulation for imaging spatial uncertainty, comparisons and evaluation of available algorithms: Proc. Geostatistical Simulation Workshop Fontainebleau, France, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Grechka, V., and Tsvankin, I., 1999, 3-D moveout velocity analysis and parameter estimation for orthorhombic media: Geophysics 64, 820–837.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kelkar M. , and Perez D. , 2002, Applied Geostatistics for Reservoir Characterization: SPG.

Liu X. , and Srinivasan S. , 2004, Field Scale Stochastic Modeling of Fracture Networks: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics Geostatistics Banff 2004: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Shen S. , Villavicencio A. P. , Garcia J. H. , Bustos A. V. , and Avendano J. R. , 2008, Characterization and modeling study of the fractured-carbonate reservoir in the Cantarell field, Mexico: SPE Annual Technical Conference, SPE 115907, 1–12.

Suzuki S. , Daly C. , Caers J. , and Mueller D. , 2005, History Matching of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Using Elastic Stress Simulation and Probability Perturbation Method: SPE Annual Technical Conference, SPE 95498, 1–20.

Tran, N., Chen, Z., and Rahman, S., 2006, Integrated conditional global optimisation for discrete fracture network modelling: Computers & Geosciences 32, 17–27.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Xu W. , Tran T. , Srivastava R. , and Journel A. , 1992, Integrating Seismic Data in Reservoir Modelling: The Collocated Cokriging Alternative: SPE, Extended Abstract, 833–842.

Zhu H. , and Journel A. G. , 1993, Formatting and Integrating Soft Data: Stochastic imaging via the Markov-Bayes Algorithm: In Geostat Troia 1992, ed. Soares, Kluwer publ., 1–12.