Integrating long- and short-wavelength statics with the generalized reciprocal method and the refraction convolution section *

Derecke Palmer; James Shadlow

doi:10.1071/EG08019

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Previous Next Contents Vol 39(3)

Integrating long- and short-wavelength statics with the generalized reciprocal method and the refraction convolution section ^*

Derecke Palmer ¹ ³ James Shadlow ¹ ²

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

¹ School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.

² Present address: Australian Worldwide Exploration, Level 9, 60 Miller Street, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia.

³ Corresponding author. Email: d.palmer@unsw.edu.au

Exploration Geophysics 39(3) 139-147 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08019
Submitted: 2 November 2007 Published: 22 September 2008

Abstract

Statics, the corrections for variations in the elevation of the ground surface and for the weathered layer, represent the major challenge to improving the resolution of land seismic reflection data. This study describes a simple approach to determining long- and short-wavelength refraction statics that are generally accurate to a few milliseconds with good quality data. The approach employs the generalized reciprocal method (GRM) and the refraction convolution section (RCS).

The resolution achieved with the GRM and RCS is comparable to that achieved with the delay-time method (DTM) together with one application of residual statics. Furthermore, a comparison with a coincident set of data recorded with different acquisition parameters shows that there is a long-wavelength static error with the DTM but not the GRM.

There is a limit in the lateral resolution of variations in the base of the weathering, which is demonstrated with triplications or ‘frowns’ in the shot records. However, the statics model also exhibits short-wavelength variations, which suggest a resolution considerably greater than that indicated to be possible by the ‘frowns’. This study proposes that the long-wavelength component represents the variations in the time model of the weathering, which are caused by gross variations in the thickness of the weathered layer, while the short-wavelength components represent the variations in the surface soil layers.

With the data used in this study, variations of more than 10 ms in the time model of the weathering were observed over distances of 10 m. Such variations result in similar intra-array statics with receiver arrays over comparable distances. These intra-array statics are a major cause of reduced resolution of reflection data and poor signal-to-noise ratios with first-break refraction data, especially in arid regions. Poor quality refraction data are the major impediment to obtaining accurate refraction statics.

Key words: delay-time method, Generalized Reciprocal Method, Refraction Convolution Section, seismic reflection processing, statics corrections.

Acknowledgments

Barry Drummond, Bruce Goleby, Tim Barton, Leonie Jones, David Schmidt, Nigel Jones, Michael Jervis, Chris Liner, Denis Sweeney, Bruce Beer, Even Ole Brenner, Frank Buker, Inger Ruth Wikander, James Shadlow, Tury Taner and Roberto de Franco have stimulated my interest in statics and provided useful discussions.

References

Ait-Messaoud M. , Boulegroun M.-Z. , Gribi A. , Kasmi R. , Touami M. , et al., 2005, New dimensions in land seismic technology: Oilfield Review Autumn 2005, 42–53. [Web document]. Available at: http://www.westerngeco.com/media/resources/articles/q_land_oilfield_review_autumn05.pdf (Accessed 9 August 2008)

Barton, R., and Barker, N., 2003, Velocity imaging by tau-p transformation of refracted traveltimes: Geophysical Prospecting 51, 195–203.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Cox M. , 1999, Statics corrections for seismic reflection surveys: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 531 pp.

de Franco, R., 2005, Multi-refractor imaging with stacked refraction convolution section: Geophysical Prospecting 53, 335–348.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Glen R. A. , Korsch R. J. , Jones L. E. A. , and Johnston D. W. , 2000, Seismic evidence for a major arc-back arc collision in the Lachlan Orogen: 15th Australian Geological Convention, Geological Society of Australia, 59, 117.

Palmer D. , 1980, The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 104 pp.

Palmer, D., 1981, An introduction to the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation: Geophysics 46, 1508–1518.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Palmer D. , 1986, Refraction seismics: the lateral resolution of structure and seismic velocity. Geophysical Press.

Palmer, D., 2001a, Imaging refractors with the convolution section: Geophysics 66, 1582–1589.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Palmer, D., 2001b, Resolving refractor ambiguities with amplitudes: Geophysics 66, 1590–1593.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Palmer, D., 2006, Refraction traveltime and amplitude corrections for very near-surface inhomogeneities: Geophysical Prospecting 54, 589–604.

Palmer, D., 2008, Is it time to re-engineer geotechnical seismic refraction methods? First Break 26(8), 69–77.

Palmer, D., Nikrouz, R., and Spyrou, A., 2005, Statics corrections for shallow seismic refraction data: Exploration Geophysics 36, 7–17.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Palmer, D., and Jones, L., 2005, A simple approach to refraction statics with the generalized reciprocal method and the refraction convolution section: Exploration Geophysics 36, 18–25.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taner, M. T., Wagner, D. E., Baysal, E., and Lee, L., 1998, A unified method for 2-D and 3-D refraction statics: Geophysics 63, 260–274.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

^* ^*Presented at the 19th ASEG Geophysical Conference & Exhibition, November 2007.