Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Calculation of conductivity and depth correction factors for the S-layer differential transform *

Magdel Combrinck
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

121 Rosen Office Park, 37 Invicta Rd, Halfway Gardens, Gauteng 1685, South Africa. Email: magdel@geotechairborne.com

Exploration Geophysics 39(2) 133-138 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08014
Submitted: 5 December 2007  Accepted: 27 April 2008   Published: 16 June 2008

Abstract

The VTEM system developed and operated by Geotech Limited and Geotech Airborne Limited is a central loop configuration system lending itself to many traditional ground interpretation strategies. One of these is the S-layer (thin, conductive layer) differential transform that is used to generate resistivity-depth sections. An empirical study indicated that delineating conductors in a conductive half space necessitates the implementation of a scale factor in order to obtain the correct depths and conductivity values when applying the S-layer differential transform.

Based on an empirical approach, there was found to be an infinite number of depth correction factors that will still yield acceptable conductivity values, and the need arose to explain the origin of this discrepancy and to find the correct depth correction factor. A correction strategy was followed, based on scaling results to yield exact conductivities when applied to half-space models. Assuming that the equivalent filament for the S-layer behaviour, as with the equivalent filament for the half-space behaviour, does not coincide with the electric field maxima in the subsurface led to a plausible depth correction factor which was validated on various synthetic models.

Key words: TDEM, S-layer, depth, conductivity, correction factors, CDI, VTEM.


Acknowledgments

I gratefully acknowledge Prof. Willem Botha (and Kumba Resources) for the use of MARCO software and for many insightful discussions on TDEM. Also my sincere gratitude to Michael Zhdanov and Peter Wolfgram for their constructive contributions in reviewing this paper.


References

Eaton, P. A., and Hohmann, G. W., 1989, A rapid inversion technique for transient electromagnetic soundings: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 53, 384–404.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | James B. A. , 1988, Detection of tunnels by transient electromagnetic subsurface imaging: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report (United States).

Kaufman A. A. , and Keller G. V. , 1983, Frequency and Transient Soundings: Methods in Geochemistry and Geophysics 16. Elsevier Science.

Macnae, J., and Lamontagne, Y., 1987, Imaging quasi-layered conductive structures by simple processing of transient electromagnetic data: Geophysics 52, 545–554.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Nabighian M. N. , and Macnae J. C. , 1991, Time Domain Electromagnetic prospecting Methods, in M. N. Nabighian ed., Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Volume 2, Application: Soc. of Expl. Geophysicists: 427–520.

Nekut, A. G., 1987, Direct inversion of time-domain electromagnetic data: Geophysics 52, 1431–1435.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sidorov V. A. , and Tikshaev V. V. , 1969, Electrical prospecting with transient field in near zone: Saratov University (in Russian).

Smith, R. S., and Edwards, R. N., 1994, An automatic technique for presentation of coincident-loop, impulse-response, transient, electromagnetic data: Geophysics 59, 1542–1550.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Spies B. R. , and Frischknecht F. C. , 1991, Electromagnetic Sounding, in M. N. Nabighian ed., Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Volume 2, Application: Soc. of Expl. Geophysicists: 285–425.

Tartaras, E., Zhdanov, M. S., Wada, K., Saito, A., and Hara, T., 2000, Fast imaging of TDEM data based on S-inversion: Journal of Applied Geophysics 43, 15–32.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wolfgram, P., and Karlik, G., 1995, Conductivity-depth transform of GEOTEM data: Exploration Geophysics 26, 179–185.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wolfgram, P., and Hyde, M., 1998, How to find localised conductors in GEOTEM data: Exploration Geophysics 29, 665–670.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhdanov, M. S., and Pavlov, D., 2001, Analysis and interpretation of anomalous conductivity and magnetic permeability effects in time domain electromagnetic data. Part II: S-inversion: Journal of Applied Geophysics 46, 235–248.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhdanov, M. S., and Pavlov, D., 2002, Localized S-inversion of time domain electromagnetic data: Geophysics 67, 1115–1125.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |




* *Presented at the 19th ASEG Geophysical Conference & Exhibition, November 2007.