Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An efficient 2.5D inversion of loop-loop electromagnetic data

Yoonho Song 1 3 Jung-Ho Kim 2
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Groundwater and Geothermal Resources Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), 30 Gajeong-Dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejon 305-350, Korea.

2 Geoelectric Imaging Laboratory, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), 30 Gajeong-Dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejon 305-350, Korea.

3 Corresponding author. Email: song@kigam.re.kr

Exploration Geophysics 39(1) 68-77 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08007
Submitted: 27 August 2007  Accepted: 8 October 2007   Published: 5 March 2008

Abstract

We have developed an inversion algorithm for loop-loop electromagnetic (EM) data, based on the localised non-linear or extended Born approximation to the solution of the 2.5D integral equation describing an EM scattering problem. Source and receiver configuration may be horizontal co-planar (HCP) or vertical co-planar (VCP). Both multi-frequency and multi-separation data can be incorporated. Our inversion code runs on a PC platform without heavy computational load.

For the sake of stable and high-resolution performance of the inversion, we implemented an algorithm determining an optimum spatially varying Lagrangian multiplier as a function of sensitivity distribution, through parameter resolution matrix and Backus-Gilbert spread function analysis. Considering that the different source-receiver orientation characteristics cause inconsistent sensitivities to the resistivity structure in simultaneous inversion of HCP and VCP data, which affects the stability and resolution of the inversion result, we adapted a weighting scheme based on the variances of misfits between the measured and calculated datasets.

The accuracy of the modelling code that we have developed has been proven over the frequency, conductivity, and geometric ranges typically used in a loop-loop EM system through comparison with 2.5D finite-element modelling results. We first applied the inversion to synthetic data, from a model with resistive as well as conductive inhomogeneities embedded in a homogeneous half-space, to validate its performance. Applying the inversion to field data and comparing the result with that of dc resistivity data, we conclude that the newly developed algorithm provides a reasonable image of the subsurface.

Key words: electromagnetic (EM), 2.5D, inversion, localised non-linear approximation.


Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Basic Research Project of Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Korea. We also thank Dr. Jeong Sul Son of KIGAM for providing the finite element modelling results.


References

Chave, A. D., 1983, Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms by quadrature and continued fraction algorithm: Geophysics 48, 1671–1686.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Frischknecht F. C. , Labson V. F. , Spies B. R. , and Anderson W. L., 1991, Profiling methods using small sources, in M. N. Nabighian ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics – Applications, 105–270: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

Habashy, T. M., Groom, R. W., and Spies, B. R., 1993, Beyond the Born and Rytov approximation: a nonlinear approach to electromagnetic scattering: Journal of Geophysical Research 98, 1759–1775.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hohmann G. W. , 1988, Numerical modeling for electromagnetic methods of geophysics, in M.N. Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics – Theory, 313–363: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

Kim, H. J., Song, Y., and Lee, K. H., 1999, Inequality constraint in least-squares inversion of geophysical data: Earth Planets Space 51, 255–259.
Menke W., 1984, Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory: Academic Press, Inc.

Sasaki, Y., 1989, Two-dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole-dipole resistivity data: Geophysics 54, 254–262.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Spies B. R. , and Frischknecht F. C. , 1991, Electromagnetic sounding, in M.N. Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics – Applications, 285–425: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

Torres-Verdin, C., and Habashy, T. M., 1994, Rapid 2.5-D forward modeling and inversion via a new non-linear scattering approximation: Radio Science 29, 1051–1079.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Won, I. J., Keiswetter, D. A., Fields, G. R. A., and Sutton, L. C., 1996, GEM-2: A new multifrequency electromagnetic sensor: Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics 1, 129–137.


Yi, M.-J., Kim, J.-H., Song, Y., Cho, S.-J., Chung, S.-H., and Suh, J.-H., 2001, Three-dimensional imaging of subsurface structures using resistivity data: Geophysical Prospecting 49, 483–497.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yi, M.-J., Kim, J.-H., and Chung, S.-H., 2003, Enhancing the resolving power of the least-squares inversion with active constraint balancing: Geophysics 68, 931–941.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |