Articles citing this paper
A comparison of shipborne and airborne electromagnetic methods for Antarctic sea ice thickness measurements
J.E. Reid, J. Vrbancich and A.P. Worby
34(2) pp.46 - 50
6 articles found in Crossref database.
Thickness distribution of Antarctic sea ice
Worby Anthony P.,
Geiger Cathleen A.,
Paget Matthew J.,
Van Woert Michael L.,
Ackley Stephen F., DeLiberty Tracy L.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 2008 113(C5).
Progressing from 1D to 2D and 3D near-surface airborne electromagnetic mapping with a multisensor, airborne sea-ice explorer
Pfaffhuber Andreas A.,
Hendricks Stefan, Kvistedal Yme A.
GEOPHYSICS. 2012 77(4). p.WB109
A comparison of the inductive‐limit footprints of airborne electromagnetic configurations
Reid James E., Vrbancich Julian
GEOPHYSICS. 2004 69(5). p.1229
Direct helicopter EM — Sea-ice thickness inversion assessed with synthetic and field data
Pfaffling Andreas,
Haas Christian, Reid James E.
GEOPHYSICS. 2007 72(4). p.F127
Comparing resistivity models from 2D and 1D inversion of frequency domain HEM data over rough terrains: cases study from Iran and Norway
Ghari Hossein Ali,
Voge Malte,
Bastani Mehrdad,
Pfaffhuber Andreas Aspmo, Oskooi Behrooz
Exploration Geophysics. 2020 51(1). p.45
Mechanisms of fast-ice development in the south-eastern Laptev Sea: a case study for winter of 2007/08 and 2009/10
Selyuzhenok Valeria,
Mahoney Andrew,
Krumpen Thomas,
Castellani Giulia, Gerdes Rüdiger
Polar Research. 2017 36(1). p.1411140