
%0 Journal Article
%A Arthur, PF 
%A Hearnshaw, H 
%A Kohun, PJ 
%A Barlow, R 
%T Evaluation of <I>Bos indicus</I> and <I>Bos taurus</I> straightbreds and crosses. III. Direct and maternal genetic effects on growth traits
%J Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
%D 1994/06/01
%V 45
%N 4
%P 807-818
%K Bos indicus;Bos taurus;heterosis;maternal effects;growth
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9940807
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/AR9940807 
%X Data on Brahman and Hereford cattle and their crosses were used to estimate direct additive, direct heterosis, maternal additive and maternal heterosis effects for pre-weaning and post-weaning liveweights, average daily gain (ADG) and height at various ages. The cattle were born at Grafton, N.S.W., and raised on high, medium and low quality pastures until weaning. During the post-weaning period, the steers were grown in three environments in New South Wales, while the heifers remained at Grafton. Genetic effects were estimated by regression and the additive components expressed as deviations from Hereford effect. Weaning weight and pre-weaning ADG of Hereford calves (both sexes) were 237.8 kg and 827 g/day on high, 210.5 kg and 704 g/day on medium, and 128.3 kg and 425 g/day on low quality pastures respectively. Post-weaning ADG of Hereford steers (weaning to 36 months) and heifers (weaning to 30 months) was 296 and 240 g/day respectively. Direct heterosis was significant (P<0.05) for most traits. Estimates of direct heterosis for weaning weight were 24.9 and 20.2 kg, and for pre-weaning ADG were 79 and 68 g/day, on high and medium quality pastures respectively. Direct heterosis for ADG of steers (weaning to 36 months) and heifers (weaning to 30 months) was 91 and 76 g/day respectively. Estimates of maternal heterosis for weaning weights were 14.9, 30.9 and 37.8 kg and for pre-weaning ADG were 31 (not significant), 105 and 153 g/day, for high, medium and low quality pastures respectively. Maternal heterosis for ADG of steers (weaning to 36 months) was -47 g/day. There was a negative direct additive effect on post-weaning ADG in environments where pasture quality was good, but the effect was not significant on poor quality pasture. Maternal additive effect was negative for birth weight for high and medium quality pastures and positive for weaning weight and pre-weaning ADG on low quality pasture. The performance of untested crosses can be predicted from the estimates and models provided. 
