
%0 Journal Article
%A Burch, GJ 
%T Soil and plant resistances to water absorption by plant root systems
%J Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
%D 1979/04/01
%V 30
%N 2
%P 279-292
%K 
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9790279
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/AR9790279 
%X A study of water absorption by root systems of two herbage species, white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), was used to partition the resistances to water flux between the soil and plant. A large and almost constant plant resistance influenced the pattern of water absorption until the soil resistance reached about 1.5 x 103 MPa s cm-3. This corresponded to an extraction of almost 80% of the available soil water. Water absorption from progressively deeper soil layers showed no evidence of any substantial resistance to water flux through the root xylem. Therefore, in wet soils, water movement into and through a root system is predominantly influenced by a large resistance to the radial water flux through root tissues outside the xylem. The radial resistance values for unit (cm) length of root were 6.49 x 106 and 6.54 x 106 MPa s cm-2 for clover and fescue respectively. A model of water uptake has been described which introduces two modified parameters for integrating the soil water potential (&psi;) and the soil-root conductance (&kappa;), over an entire root system. This study, along with other evidence from the literature, would indicate that for unit length of root the radial resistance to water absorption is reasonably similar, not only for an entire root system but also for a number of different species. An underestimation of the radial soil resistance (Rsr) to water absorption suggests that a root contact resistance (Rc) exists which could be due to the shrinkage of the soil or root, or both, with drying of the soil. This effect caused an increase in resistance to water absorption of about 48 x Rsr for fescue and 71 x Rsr for clover. This difference in Rc between the two species was attributed to a contrast in root morphology, especially a difference in the average root diameters of the two species. 
