
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Turner, HN 
A1  - Dolling, CHS 
A1  - Kennedy, JF 
T1  - Response to selection in Australian Merino sheep.  I. Selection for high clean wool weight, with a ceiling on fibre diameter and degree of skin wrinkle.  Response in wool and body characteristics
JF  - Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
JO  - Aust. J.  Agric. Res.
Y1  - 1968
VL  - 19
IS  - 1
SP  - 79
EP  - 112
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9680079 
N2  - Direct and correlated responses are reported for two groups of sheep selected for high clean wool weight. The work covers two periods. In the first (1950&ndash;59), both groups had selection against high average fibre diameter and high degree of skin wrinkle, but in one group (S) the performance of the ram's half-sibs was considered as well as his own, while in the other (MS) mass selection was practiced for rams. For ewes, mass selection was practiced in both groups. In the second period (1961&ndash;64), mass selection was used for both sexes in both groups, with selection against high diameter and degree of wrinkle in one group (S), and against low crimp frequency and high degree of wrinkle in the other (MS). In both periods response to selection was assessed by comparison with a random control group. In the first period, response in clean wool weight was similar in S and MS, both for rams measured at 10&ndash;11 months, when a preliminary selection on them was carried out, and for ewes measured at 15&ndash;16 months, when final selection was made for both sexes. The annual rates of increase in clean wool weight for S and MS were 2.1 and 1.8&#37; for rams and 2.4 and 2.7&#37; for ewes, the lower rate in rams being due to the fact that response at 10&ndash;11 months is a correlated response to the final selection at 15&ndash;16 months. As the rates of increase in the two groups are similar, it can be concluded that examination of half-sibs is not worth while; this would in fact have been predicted from the high heritability estimates for clean wool weight. There were negligible trends in fibre diameter and wrinkle score, indicating that counter-selection has been effective in preventing an increase in these characteristics. Fibre number per unit skin area made the greatest contribution to the increases in clean wool weight, the annual rates of increase for S and MS being 2.0 and 2.2&#37; for rams and 2.0 and I .8&#37; for ewes. Greasy wool weight, percentage clean yield, body weight, and staple length also showed increases with increasing clean wool weight in both selected groups. In spite of the fact that fibre diameter did not increase, crimp number per unit of staple length decreased in both groups. This is a further confirmation of the strong negative genetic correlation between clean wool weight and crimp number, and of the lack of a strong association between crimp number and fibre diameter. In the second period, no further response was observed. It is impossible to say at this stage whether a selection plateau has been reached or whether drought conditions interfered with response. 
ER  -

