
%0 Journal Article
%A Knight, A. 
%A Blott, K. 
%A Portelli, M. 
%A Hignett, C. 
%T Use of tree and shrub belts to control leakage in three dryland cropping environments
%J Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
%D 2002/05/08
%V 53
%N 5
%P 571-586
%K dryland crops, alley farming, agroforestry, deep drainage, potential recharge, salinity, saltbush, Atriplex, Acacia, water use, farm forestry.
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/AR01089
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/AR01089 
%X The water extraction of deep-rooted perennial trees and shrub belts integrated with annual cropping/grazing systems was studied at 3 sites in the 300&#8211;450 mm rainfall zone of the Murray&#8211;Darling Basin of south-eastern Australia. Within 4 years of planting alley farming systems on cropland, the soil directly below and near the belts had dried the deep profile. Between 82 and 261 mm of extra soil water storage capacity was created in the 2.5 to 5.5&#8211;6 m profile. At Palamana (the only site monitored to greater depth), living roots were found 16 m below the surface. The cumulative water content of the soil to 12 m under the belts was 600 mm less than of soil cores extracted from nearby cropland. This water storage difference created under the belts is greater than the largest episodic event likely in this region and it is therefore unlikely that leakage will occur directly under or within a few metres of the belts. The early growth of the belts was rapid and the leaf area of the belts far exceeded that of remnant mallee eucalypt vegetation. The belts used water that had accumulated deep in the profile below the annual cropping systems they replaced. However, the belts only used water from below or within a few metres from the edge with the adjacent cropland. As suggested by RJ Harper et al. (2000), a much greater amount of potential recharge could be controlled if deep-rooted perennials were planted more closely across the landscape (compared with widely spaced belts). However, although the belts may be beneficial for the catchment water balance, they would be commercially unacceptable to farmers. In practice, farmers put the belts usually no less than 50&#8211;70 m apart so that less cropland is displaced and there is less belt/crop competition. In such cases alley farming only controls a small percentage of the total leakage, similar to the amount of crop yield lost by displacement and competition. It would be better to use a full coverage of perennials on soils where annual systems are the leakiest, rather than belts across all of the landscape, some of which may not be very leaky and could be highly profitable for annual cropping. Leakage could be controlled under cropland in a few years by growing easy to establish perennial species to retrieve moisture deep in the profile. At Pallamana the belts utilised 600 mm of accumulated leakage from deep in the profile in less than 4 years. Based on the average annual recharge rates under annual cropping (11&#8211;35 mm) the land could be cropped again for between 17 and 55 years before that leakage accumulated again. 
