A Unimolecular Half-Subtractor Based on Effective Photoinduced Electron Transfer and Intramolecular Charge Transfer Processes of 1,8-Naphthalimide Derivative
Bing Leng A and He Tian A BA Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Institute of Fine Chemicals, East China University of Science & Technology, Shanghai 200237, China.
B Corresponding author. Email: tianhe@ecust.edu.cn
Australian Journal of Chemistry 63(2) 169-172 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09455
Submitted: 31 August 2009 Accepted: 21 October 2009 Published: 26 February 2010
Abstract
We report a unimolecular system as a combinatorial logic half-subtractor based on a naphthalimide derivative. Chemical inputs (OH– and H+) can significantly change the absorption and fluorescence characteristics through modulating intramolecular charge transfer and photoinduced electron transfer process upon protonation or deprotonation of the molecule. An XOR gate is obtained following the absorbance variations at 485 nm, and an INHIBIT gate is induced when the output signal is monitored at 535 nm in the fluorescence spectra. Large differences in output signals allow unequivocal assignment of logic-0 and logic-1 of both logic gates, which may function in parallel to implement the half-subtractor.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NSFC/China, National Basic Research 973 Program (2006CB806200) and Scientific Committee of Shanghai.
[1]
(a) A. P. de Silva,
N. D. McClenaghan,
Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 574.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |