Reaction of the Five-Coordinate O-Nitrito Complex Fe(Por)(ONO) (Por = meso-tetra-arylporphyrinato) with THF Gives Two Six-Coordinate Isomers
Tigran S. Kurtikyan A B E , Astghik A. Hovhannisyan A , Alexei Iretskii C and Peter C. Ford D EA Molecule Structure Research Centre (MSRC) NAS, 0014, Yerevan, Armenia.
B Research Institute of Applied Chemistry (ARIAC), 0053, Yerevan, Armenia.
C Department of Chemistry, Lake Superior State University, Sault Ste Marie, MI 49783, USA.
D Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9510, USA.
E Corresponding authors. Email: kurto@netsys.am; ford@chem.ucsb.edu
Australian Journal of Chemistry 62(10) 1226-1230 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09318
Submitted: 4 June 2009 Accepted: 24 July 2009 Published: 13 October 2009
Abstract
The effect of the proximal ligand on the coordination of the nitrite ligand to the heme model systems Fe(Por)(η1-ONO) (Por = meso-tetraarylporphyrinato dianion) was investigated by FTIR and UV-vis spectra in solvent free, low temperature, porous layered solids and by density functional computations. The reaction of the five-coordinate complex Fe(Por)(η1-ONO) with the ether tetrahydrofuran gives a mixture of the O-nitrito and N-nitrito isomers Fe(Por)(THF)(η1-ONO) and Fe(Por)(THF)(NO2), respectively. This observation is in contrast to earlier studies with nitrogen donor Lewis bases where the N-nitrito isomers were clearly the more stable of the six-coordinated complexes. The adduct formation is reversible; the five-coordinate O-nitrito complexes Fe(Por)(η1-ONO) were largely restored upon warming under vacuum pumping.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from ISTC (Project #A-484) is gratefully acknowledged. P.C.F. also thanks the US National Science Foundation (CHE-0749524).
[1]
J. O. Lundberg,
E. Weitzberg,
M. T. Gladwin,
Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 156.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |