Comparison of cis and trans-Platinum Mononucleobase Compounds with DNA and Protein Models
Joseph V. Strukl A , Queite A. de Paula A , Xiaohong Yang A , Yun Qu A and Nicholas P. Farrell A BA Department of Chemistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284-2006, USA.
B Corresponding author. Email: npfarrell@vcu.edu
Australian Journal of Chemistry 61(9) 694-699 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH08227
Submitted: 30 May 2008 Accepted: 28 July 2008 Published: 5 September 2008
Abstract
Reactions of 5′-guanosine monophosphate (5′-GMP) and N-acetylmethionine (N-ac-l-Met) with the mononucleobase compounds, cis-[PtCl(L)n(9-EtGH)]+ (L = NH3, 4-pic, n = 2; L = en, n = 1) in a 1:1 molar ratio have been studied in aqueous solutions at pH 7.3 using 1H and 195Pt NMR spectroscopy. There is a high kinetic preference for sulfur over nitrogen binding. These results are compared with the trans isomers. Based on low cytotoxicity and a high sulfur/nitrogen preference the cis isomers may also present suitable features for antiviral activity through interaction with specific proteins.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the assistance of John B. Mangrum for mass spectrometric characterization. The authors also thank the National Science Foundation, the National Science Foundation REU program, and the Virginia Academy of Science for financial support. Dr Q. A. de Paula acknowledges the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for a fellowship.
[1]
[2]
[3]
E. Wong,
C. M. Giandomenico,
Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2451.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |