Pitfalls in the Photoelectron Spectroscopic Investigations of Benzyne. Photoelectron Spectrum of Cyclopentadienylideneketene
Anna Chrostowska A C , Genevieve Pfister-Guillouzo A , Françoise Gracian A and Curt Wentrup B CA Equipe de Chimie Physique, Institut Pluridisciplinaire de Recherche sur l’Environnement et les Matériaux, UMR CRNS 5254, Université de Pau et les Pays de l’Adour, 6400 Pau, France.
B School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.
C Corresponding authors. Email: anna.chrostowska@univ-pau.fr; wentrup@uq.edu.au
Australian Journal of Chemistry 63(7) 1084-1090 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09641
Submitted: 9 December 2009 Accepted: 20 April 2010 Published: 15 July 2010
Abstract
The 9.24 eV ionization energy often quoted in photoelectron spectroscopic investigations of benzyne is not due to benzyne 1 but to benzene, C6H6. The 8.9 eV ionization is not due to benzyne either but to cyclopentadienylideneketene 12 when a 10.2 eV band is also present, or to biphenylene 5 when a 7.6 eV band is simultaneously present. Cyclopentadienylideneketene 12 has been generated by flash vacuum thermolysis of four different precursors, which permit a linking of infrared, mass, and photoelectron spectroscopic observations.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council and by the CNRS.
[1]
M. J. S. Dewar,
T.-P. Tien,
Chem. Commun. 1985, 1243.
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |