A Fe(bipy)2 Unit Fused to a Keggin Polyoxotungstate Anion
Jingli Xie A C , Ryan Gilbert-Wilson A , Boujemaa Moubaraki B , Keith S. Murray B and Anthony G. Wedd A CA School of Chemistry and the Bio21 Institute of Molecular Science and Biotechnology, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.
B School of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia.
C Corresponding authors. Email: xij@unimelb.edu.au; agw@unimelb.edu.au
Australian Journal of Chemistry 63(2) 252-256 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09437
Submitted: 13 August 2009 Accepted: 2 November 2009 Published: 26 February 2010
Abstract
Two new hybrid materials [Fe(bipy)3]3[ZnW12O39(OH)Fe(bipy)2(H2O)]2 and [Fe(bipy)3]2[CoW12O40] were obtained by hydrothermal synthesis. They contain [Fe(bipy)3] n+ (bipy = 2,2′-bipyridyl; n = 2 or 3) cations and Keggin-type polyoxotungstate anions. Both have been characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR spectroscopy, 1H-NMR spectrometry, and single crystal X-ray crystallography. The anion in the former salt features [FeII(bipy)2(OH2)]2+ units covalently bound via a W=O-Fe bridge to the protonated anion [ZnW12O39(OH)]5–. The latter salt contains discrete [CoW12O40]6– anions.
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful for financial support by the Australian Research Council under grants No. DP0770585 (J.X.) and DP0450134 (A.G.W.).
[1]
(b) B. Hasenknopf,
K. Micoine,
E. Lacôte,
S. Thorimbert,
M. Malacria,
R. Thouvenot,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 5001.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
[15]
[16]
[17]