Bis(allyl)ruthenium(iv)-initiated S–S and C–S Bond Cleavages in Tetraalkylthiuram Sulfides. Formation and X-ray Crystal Structures of Dithiocarbamato Complexes*
Chang Xu A , Sumod A. Pullarkat A and Lai Yoong Goh A BA Division of Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore.
B Corresponding authors. Email: Sumod@ntu.edu.sg; LaiYoongGoh@ntu.edu.sg
Australian Journal of Chemistry 62(11) 1537-1543 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09375
Submitted: 3 July 2009 Accepted: 7 September 2009 Published: 20 November 2009
Abstract
The direct reaction of [{Ru(η3:η3-C10H16)(μ-Cl)Cl}2] (1) with tetraalkyldithiuram disulfides [R2NC(S)S-]2 (R = Me, iPr) and monosulfide [Me2NC(S)]2S led to the formation of orange solids of [Ru(η3:η3-C10H16)(η2-S2CNR2)Cl] (2a, R = Me; 2b, R =iPr) in high yields. Reaction of 1 with KPF6 and monosulfide [Me2NC(S)]2S resulted in [Ru(η3:η3-C10H16)(η2-S2CNMe2)(CH3CN)](PF6) (3). The treatment of 2a with KPF6 also yielded 3 in quantitative yield. Compounds 2–3 have been spectroscopically and crystallographically characterized.
Acknowledgement
The authors acknowledge with thanks support from the Nanyang Technological University and a research scholarship to C.X., as well as technical assistance from Dr L. Yongxin for X-ray structure determinations.
[1]
(a) J. E. Lydon,
J. K. Nicholson,
B. L. Shaw,
M. R. Truter,
Proc. Chem. Soc. 1964, 421.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29]
[30]
* This article was intended for the UQ-NUS Research Front (Volume 62, issue 9).