Asymmetric Synthesis using Organoboranes. Relative Effectiveness of the B-Halobis(terpenyl)boranes for the Enantioselective Halogenative Cleavage of Representative meso-Epoxides*
Chandra D. Roy A B C and Herbert C. Brown AA Department of Chemistry, Herbert C. Brown Center for Borane Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2084, USA.
B Present address: EMD Biosciences, Inc., 10394 Pacific Center Court, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: chandra0919@gmail.com
Australian Journal of Chemistry 60(11) 835-842 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH07118
Submitted: 20 April 2007 Accepted: 13 May 2007 Published: 1 November 2007
Abstract
A comparative study of the relative effectiveness of various Ter2BX, such as dEap2BX, lEap2BX, 2-dIcr2BX, 4-dIcr2BX, and lCleap2BX along with dIpc2BX for the asymmetric ring opening of three representative meso-epoxides (cyclohexene, cyclopentene, and cis-2,3-butene oxides) is reported. Among all the reagents studied, 2-dIcr2BCl (78–80%) demonstrated significant improvement in enantiomeric excess over a previously explored reagent, dIpc2BCl (41%), especially for meso-cyclohexene oxide. Although all these three reagents, dIpc2BBr, dEap2BBr, and 2-dIcr2BBr provided comparable enantiomerically enriched 2-bromocyclohexan-1-ol (76–86%) from meso-cyclohexene oxide, the carene-based reagent, 2-dIcr2BBr showed considerable improvements in enantiomeric excesses in the cases of meso-cyclopentene oxide (67%) and meso-cis-2,3-butene oxide (78%) than those achieved with previously reported reagent, dIpc2BBr (57 and 61% respectively). The enantioselectivity of the reaction was observed to be highly substrate dependent. The present study represents a significant advance in asymmetric synthesis using the chiral organoborane chemistry.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Office of Naval Research and the Purdue Borane Research Fund.
[1]
(a) K. Narasaka,
Synthesis 1991, 39, 1. and pertinent references therein.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
and references cited therein.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
and references cited therein.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
* This paper is dedicated to the memory of my mentor, the late Professor Herbert C. Brown (1912–2004). The work described herein was carried out at Purdue University as a post-doctoral research associate.