Hierarchical Assembly Involving Hydroxyethyl-substituted Imidazolium Cations and p-Sulfonatocalix[4]arenes
Irene Ling A , Yatimah Alias A , Brian W. Skelton B and Colin L. Raston C DA Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya,50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
B School of Biomedical, Biomolecular and Chemical Sciences, University ofWestern Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
C Centre for Strategic Nano-Fabrication, School of Biomedical, Biomolecular andChemical Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway,Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: colin.raston@uwa.edu.au
Australian Journal of Chemistry 63(10) 1492-1496 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH10249
Submitted: 19 June 2010 Accepted: 11 August 2010 Published: 1 October 2010
Abstract
A multiple-component bilayer involving four different ions has preferential binding of functionalized 3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-methylimidazolium in the cavity of bowl-shaped p-sulfonatocalix[4]arene, with the supermolecule being capped by a water molecule involving an O–H···π(imidazolium) interaction, an O···HO H-bond involving the hydroxyethyl group, and an SO···HO H-bond. The nature of the interplay of the components has been mapped out using Hirshfeld surface analysis. The [imidazolium ∩ calixarene] supermolecule persists in solution.
Acknowlegdements
We thank the University of Malaya for financial support from the university research grant PS354/2009A, the University of Malaya Centre for Ionic Liquids (TA021/2009A), the University of Western Australia and the Australian Research Council for supporting this work.
[1]
(b) J. L. Atwood,
L. J. Barbour,
M. J. Hardie,
C. L. Raston,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 222, 3.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |