Two Interesting One-Dimensional Chainlike Architectures Formed by Substituted Keggin Polyoxoanions and Novel Cobalt–Ethylenediamine Complexes
Yu Wang A , Zhiming Zhang A , Enbo Wang A B , Yanfei Qi A and Song Chang AA Key Laboratory of Polyoxometalate Science of Ministry of Education, Department of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jinlin, 130024, China.
B Corresponding author. Email: wangenbo@public.cc.jl.cn; wangeb889@nenu.edu.cn
Australian Journal of Chemistry 61(11) 874-880 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH08171
Submitted: 21 April 2008 Accepted: 8 August 2008 Published: 5 November 2008
Abstract
Two novel supported heteropolytungstates, NaH3[CoIII(en)2(OH)SiW11CoIIO39]·9.25H2O 1 (en = ethylenediamine) and [Co(en)2]4[Co4(Hen)2Si2W18O68]·H2en·6H2O 2 have been synthesized and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, electrochemistry, IR, and thermogravimetry. Compound 1 exhibits an interesting one-dimensional chainlike architecture assembled by bridged sodium ions that support monosubstituted Keggin polyoxoanions. To our knowledge, it represents the first example of a supported structure that consists of monosubstituted Keggin polyoxoanions and a novel interbridged, dinuclear Co metal unit. Compound 2 is constructed from trivacant Keggin polyanions linked through a tetrameric cobalt unit, which coordinates with organonitrogen ligands. Moreover, the sandwich-type polyoxoanions were connected by two [Co(en)2] coordination complexes, respectively, and linked by Co2+ ions into a straight chain.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Postdoctoral station Foundation of Ministry of Education (no. 20060200002), the Testing Foundation of North-east Normal University, and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University.
[1]
(a) L. C. W. Baker,
D. C. Glick,
Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 3.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30]