CSIRO Publishing

An international journal for chemical science

Shopping Cart: ( empty )

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Previous Next Contents Vol 61(3)

Aromaticity in Heterocyclic and Inorganic Benzene Analogues

Simon C. A. H. Pierrefixe ^A and F. Matthias Bickelhaupt ^A ^B

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A Afdeling Theoretische Chemie, and Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling, Scheikundig Laboratorium der Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1083, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

^B Corresponding author. Email: fm.bickelhaupt@few.vu.nl

Australian Journal of Chemistry 61(3) 209-215 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH08043
Submitted: 2 February 2008 Accepted: 5 March 2008 Published: 26 March 2008

Abstract

Recently, we presented a molecular orbital (MO) model of aromaticity that explains, in terms of simple orbital-overlap arguments, why benzene (C₆H₆) has a regular structure with delocalized double bonds. Here, we show that the same model and the same type of orbital-overlap arguments also account for heterocyclic and inorganic benzene analogues, such as s-triazine (C₃N₃H₃), hexazine (N₆), borazine (B₃N₃H₆), boroxine (B₃O₃H₃), hexasilabenzene (Si₆H₆), and hexaphosphabenzene (P₆). Our MO model is based on accurate Kohn–Sham density-functional theory (DFT) analyses of the bonding in the seven model systems, and how the bonding mechanism is affected if these molecules undergo geometrical deformations between regular, delocalized ring structures and distorted ones with localized double bonds. It turns out that also in the heterocyclic and inorganic benzene analogues, the propensity of the π electrons is always to localize the double bonds, against the delocalizing force of the σ electrons. The latter in general prevails, yielding the regular, delocalized ring structures. Interestingly, we find one exception to this rule: N₆.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-CW and NWO-NCF) for financial support.

References

[1] (a) Garratt P. J., Aromaticity 1986 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY).
       (b) Minkin V. I., Glukhotsev M. N., Simkin B. Y., Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity: Electronic and Structural Aspects 1994 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY).

[2] (a) Smith M. B., March J., March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry, 6th edn 2007 (Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY).
       (b) Carey F. A., Sundberg R. J., Advanced Organic Chemistry: Structure and Mechanisms (Part A) 2000 (Springer: New York, NY).

[3] E. Hückel, Z. Phys. 1931, 70, 204.
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |


        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
        | Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |