Kinetic Investigations on Microwave-Assisted Statistical Terpolymerizations of 2-Oxazoline Monomers
Richard Hoogenboom A , Frank Wiesbrock A , Mark A. M. Leenen A , Michel van der Loop A , Sjoerd F. G. M. van Nispen A and Ulrich S. Schubert A B CA Laboratory of Macromolecular Chemistry and Nanoscience, Eindhoven University of Technology and Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI), PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
B Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Humboldstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, Germany.
C Corresponding author. Email: u.s.schubert@tue.nl
Australian Journal of Chemistry 60(9) 656-661 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH07150
Submitted: 8 May 2007 Accepted: 1 August 2007 Published: 11 September 2007
Abstract
The microwave-assisted statistical terpolymerization of 2-oxazolines via a living cationic ring-opening polymerization mechanism is discussed. Kinetic investigations on the terpolymerizations of combinations of 2-methyl-2-oxazoline, 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline, 2-nonyl-2-oxazoline, and 2-phenyl-2-oxazoline were performed by heating separate polymerization mixtures for different predefined times. The resulting polymer solutions were analyzed by gas chromatography and size exclusion chromatography, demonstrating the living character of the statistical terpolymerizations. In addition, the monomer distribution throughout the polymer chains is discussed based on the linear first order kinetic plots of the separate monomers in the terpolymerizations. The observed differences in monomer distribution are expected to influence the polymer properties, which will be the focus of future investigations.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank the Dutch council for scientific research (NWO), the Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI), and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie for financial support.
[1]
N. Hadjichristidis,
M. Pitsikalis,
S. Pispas,
H. Iatrou,
Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3747.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |