Porous Vanadium/Titanium Oxides—Synthesis, Characterization, and Photocatalytic Activity
Meifang Zhou A , Fuzhi Huang A , Xingdong Wang A , Johan du Plessis B , Anthony B. Murphy C and Rachel A. Caruso A DA Particulate Fluids Processing Centre, School of Chemistry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3010, Australia.
B Department of Applied Physics, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia.
C CSIRO Industrial Physics, Lindfield NSW 2070, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: rcaruso@unimelb.edu.au
Australian Journal of Chemistry 60(7) 533-540 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH06405
Submitted: 31 October 2006 Accepted: 22 December 2006 Published: 9 July 2007
Abstract
Sol–gel chemistry and a templating technique were combined for the synthesis of vanadium/titanium oxides with controlled porous structure and various quantities of vanadium (0–9.7 at-%). The specific surface area of the porous vanadium/titanium oxides increased with increasing vanadium content to a maximum of 72 m2 g–1 at 6.6 at-% V, with a corresponding decrease in anatase crystal size (minimum of 12.4 nm), and c-axis lattice parameter (0.9475 nm). The optical band-gap decreased substantially from 3.10 eV for TiO2 to 2.53 eV on the addition of 9.7 at-% V. The adsorption capability of the oxides for aqueous methylene blue (pH ~6) increased significantly with increasing vanadium content (26.7 to 318.9 mg L–1 g–1 for 0 to 9.7 at-% V). The photodegradation of methylene blue was most efficient with the 0.9 at-% V-TiO2 sample for both UV and visible light irradiation.
Acknowledgments
The Australian Research Council is acknowledged for financial support. R.A.C. is grateful to the ARC for an Australian Research Fellowship.
[1]
B. O’Regan,
M. Grätzel,
Nature 1991, 353, 737.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |