
%0 Journal Article
%A Sudmeyer, R. A. 
%A Adams, M. A. 
%A Eastham, J. 
%A Scott, P. R. 
%A Hawkins, W. 
%A Rowland, I. C. 
%T Broadacre crop yield in the lee of windbreaks in the medium and low rainfall areas of south-western Australia
%J Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
%D 2002/10/23
%V 42
%N 6
%P 739-750
%K barley, canola, lupins, shelter, wheat, wind erosion.
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/EA02011
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/EA02011 
%X In Western Australia, the paucity of documented information detailing crop yield in the lee of windbreaks is a constraint to the adoption of tree windbreaks in dryland farming systems. This paper presents grain yield data for crops growing in the lee of windbreaks in the medium to low rainfall areas of the south-west of Western Australia for 64 field years between 1994 and 1997. Two distinct areas were identified in the lee of windbreaks: a zone of reduced crop yield extending 3&#8211;5 times the windbreak height (H) from the trees (competition zone), and a zone of unchanged or improved yield extending 15&#8211;20 H (sheltered zone). Yield between 1 and 20 H was less than unsheltered yield in years with average rainfall, similar to unsheltered yield in years, or areas, with low rainfall and higher than unsheltered yield if the unsheltered crop was subjected to sandblasting. Changes in microclimate in shelter appeared to be of benefit in increasing crop yields in drier years or areas. Lupin yield was generally increased in the sheltered zone while cereal yield was generally unchanged. The rate of canopy development may be critical to crop response. In dry years, reduced wind speed in shelter reduced evaporation of soil moisture, increasing the amount of soil water available to establishing crops and reducing sandblasting damage. The principle benefit of windbreaks was their ability to reduce wind erosion and subsequent crop damage. As such, windbreaks are best regarded as a form of insurance. 
