
%0 Journal Article
%A Adams, N. R. 
%A Blache, D. 
%A Briegel, J. R. 
%T Feed intake, liveweight and wool growth rate in Merino sheep with different responsiveness to low- or high-quality feed
%J Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
%D 2002/06/26
%V 42
%N 4
%P 399-405
%K leptin, fatness, fleece weight.
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/EA01105
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/EA01105 
%X A previous field trial using 30 sheep from each of 3 strains of Merino sheep (designated F, M and B) found that wool growth rate in strain B changed less throughout the year, compared with the other 2 strains. The present study examined components of liveweight loss on dry pasture with low protein and low digestibility to detect underlying relationships with the subsequent responsiveness of wool growth rate to young green pasture. Strain B lost less liveweight when grazed on dry (poor-quality) pasture, but lost more liveweight on sparse green pasture, than the other 2 strains. The rate of liveweight loss was not related to fatness on dry pasture, but was related to fatness on green pasture. The plasma concentration of leptin at the start of winter was related to clean-fleece weight (P&#60;0.01). A second study examined the role of voluntary feed intake in strains M and B, offered low (56% digestibility) and then high (70% digestibility) quality feed ad libitum in individual pens. Wool growth rate increased (P&#60;0.001) on the better feed and tended to increase more (P = 0.06) in strain M. Feed intake increased (P = 0.01) more in Strain M when offered good-quality feed. Fatness affected feed intake similarly in both periods. The results indicate 2 mechanisms that differed between feed conditions. First, sheep differed in their capacity to increase wool growth on high-quality feed, associated with the capacity to increase feed intake. Second, fatness was associated with the differential liveweight response to good or poor quality feed, although it was not clear whether it acted through appetite. It is hypothesised that the capacity to increase wool growth rate on good feed may be associated with a greater decrease in protein synthesis rate on poor quality pasture. This may result in a lower drive to eat and so a greater liveweight loss on poor pasture. 
