Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Can I record this? A scoping review of Australian hospital policies governing consultation recording

Megan Prictor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5244-2041 A * , Nikka Milani A and Amelia Hyatt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2322-7817 B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, 185 Pelham Street, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia.

B Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.

C School of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia.

* Correspondence to: megan.prictor@unimelb.edu.au

Australian Health Review https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24306
Submitted: 7 November 2024  Accepted: 5 December 2024  Published: 23 December 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA.

Abstract

Objective

Recording consultations can benefit patients and healthcare providers, but advantageous recording practices are dogged by legal concerns. In Australia, relevant laws are poorly understood. We postulate that local policies are more important than law in guiding consultation recording. This study aimed to describe the availability and content of consultation recording policy in Australian hospitals.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review utilising JBI methods and our previously published protocol. We collected policies from Australian hospitals (April–October 2023) about the audio/video recording of patients, providers or others within the hospital. We reported findings descriptively and analysed policies’ alignment with the law.

Results

Of the 43 hospitals examined, 17/43 (40%) had relevant policies, 17/43 (40%) had a partial policy and 9/43 (21%) had no policy. Policies were usually difficult to find and were stricter than relevant law.

Conclusions

When patients want to record their appointments, it can be hard to identify relevant hospital policy. Policies generally weigh against consultation recording and are more restrictive than Australian law allows. These results indicate that healthcare services should develop clear, readily available policies on recording, balancing patients’ and providers’ interests.

Keywords: audio, clinicians, family, healthcare consultation, hospital, law, patients, policy, recording, scoping review, video.

References

Tsulukidze M, Durand M-A, Barr PJ, et al. Providing recording of clinical consultation to patients – A highly valued but underutilized intervention: A scoping review. Patient Educ Couns 2014; 95: 297-304.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Tierney AA, Gayre G, Hoberman B, et al. Ambient artificial intelligence scribes to alleviate the burden of clinical documentation. NEJM Catal 2024; 5: CAT.23.0404.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hyatt A, Lipson-Smith R, Morkunas B, et al. Testing consultation recordings in a clinical setting with the SecondEars smartphone app: mixed methods implementation study. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2020; 8: e15593.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Ryan L, Weir K, Maskell J, et al. Smartphone standoff: a qualitative study exploring clinician responses when a patient uses a smartphone to record a hospital clinical encounter. BMJ Open 2022; 12: e056214.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Prictor M, Johnston C, Hyatt A. Overt and covert recordings of health care consultations in Australia: some legal considerations. Med J Aust 2021; 214: 119-123.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Castaldo M. Can patients make recordings of medical encounters?: what does the law say? JAMA 2017; 318: 513-514.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hyatt A, Prictor M. How can the law better enable consultation recording? A rejoinder. Commun Med 2022 19: 86-89.
| Google Scholar |

Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement 2021; 19: 3-10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Milani N, Prictor M. Characteristics of Australian health service policies governing consultation recording: a scoping review. OSF Registry; 2022. 10.17605/OSF.IO/RC2D6.

10  Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synth 2022 20: 953-968.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

11  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Hospital resources 2019-20. 2019. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/myhospitals/themes/hospital-workforce [accessed 30 August 2024].

12  Covidence. Covidence systematic review software. 2024. Available at www.covidence.org

13  Surveillance Devices Act 2016 (SA).

14  Surveillance Devices Act 1998 (WA).

15  Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth).

16  NSW Ministry of Health. Privacy Manual for Health Information. 2015. Available at https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/manuals/Pages/privacy-manual-for-health-information.aspx

17  NSW Health. Communications - Use & Management of Misuse of NSW Health Communications Systems. 2009. Available at https://www1.health.nsw.gov.au/pds/Pages/doc.aspx?dn=PD2009_076

18  MohammadiGorji S, Bosch SJ, Valipoor S, et al. Investigating the impact of healthcare environmental design on staff security: a systematic review. HERD Health Environ Res Des J 2021; 14: 251-272.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

19  Sagha Zadeh R, Shepley MM, Owora AH, et al. The importance of specific workplace environment characteristics for maximum health and performance: healthcare workers’ perspective. J Occup Environ Med 2018; 60: e245.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

20  Pitkethly M, MacGillivray S, Ryan R. Recordings or summaries of consultations for people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 2008; CD001539.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

21  Dommershuijsen LJ, Dedding CWM, Van Bruchem-Visser RL. Consultation recording: what is the added value for patients aged 50 years and over? A systematic review. Health Commun 2021; 36: 168-178.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

22  Rieger KL, Hack TF, Beaver K, et al. Should consultation recording use be a practice standard? A systematic review of the effectiveness and implementation of consultation recordings. Psychooncology 2018; 27: 1121-1128.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

23  The Medical Protection Society Limited. 91% of doctors want more guidance on patient’s recording consultations, MPS survey reveals. 2018. Available at https://www.medicalprotection.org/uk/articles/91-percent-of-doctors-want-more-guidance-on-patients-recording-consultations-mps-survey-reveals [accessed 5 June 2019].

24  Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW. Patients recording clinical encounters: a path to empowerment? Assessment by mixed methods. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e008566.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

25  Ryan L, Weir KA, Maskell J, et al. ‘What are you hiding from me?’ A qualitative study exploring health consumer attitudes and experiences regarding the patient-led recording of a hospital clinical encounter. Health Expect 2022; 25: 3096-3104.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

26  Barr PJ, Bonasia K, Verma K, et al. Audio-/videorecording clinic visits for patient’s personal use in the United States: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20: e11308.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

27  Yentis SM, Shinde S, Bogod D, et al. Audio/visual recording of doctors in hospitals: Guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 2020; 75: 1082-1085.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

28  State of New South Wales v Hollingsworth [2023] NSWCA 152.

29  Gramenz J. Former cop suing NSW loses battle to record doctors. The Canberra Times, 2023. Available at https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8258228/former-cop-suing-nsw-loses-battle-to-record-doctors/ [accessed 4 September 2024].

30  Medical Board of Australia. Good Medical Practice: A Code of Conduct for Doctors in Australia. Available at https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/codes-guidelines-policies/code-of-conduct.aspx