A digitally enabled health workforce for Australia
Anna Janssen A * , Melissa Baysari A , Christina Igasto B , Kate Quirke C , Petra Milnes D , Tim Shaw A and Adam Dunn AA
B
C
D
Abstract
Australia has world-class education for healthcare professionals and is recognised for its strength in digital health research but is yet to fill some important gaps in training healthcare professionals in the safe implementation and use of digital technologies. In this case study, we bring together the perspectives of clinicians, health system leaders, and academics to guide efforts in establishing a digitally enabled workforce in Australia. Building on published evidence, our recommendations include leveraging on recent momentum, building strong partnerships with healthcare organisations, academia, and the digital health industry, and ultimately an expansion of a digitally enabled clinical informatics and digital health workforce.
Keywords: digital health, digital health capabilities, education, health workforce, workforce training.
The current state
Healthcare is increasingly digitised, and with this change comes the need for a digitally enabled care workforce which is confident and capable of using digital technologies safely and effectively to deliver care.1 We know what a digitally enabled care workforce should look like in Australia because we have multiple capability frameworks.2,3 These describe what healthcare professionals should be able to do, as well as the skills of a new workforce specialising in the design, implementation, and safe deployment of new digital health technologies in practice. This case study paper aims to describe the complex factors that contribute to building a digitally enabled workforce,1 and highlight the role of workforce education in that process.
Despite the need for a digitally enabled health workforce being identified more than a decade ago,4–6 key hurdles remain in realising this vision. Overcoming these barriers remains a priority in Australia.7 The COVID-19 pandemic made these gaps much more visible. The health system response to the pandemic disrupted existing processes of care delivery and accelerated the adoption of digital technologies in healthcare.8,9 This also made new models of care available.10,11
The momentum in digital health technology adoption created by the pandemic may be slowing,8–10 but it is important that the goal of a digitally enabled health system continues to enable benefits for all health stakeholders. Use of robust training initiatives to maintain and grow the skills of the workforce using digital technologies, and increasingly building these skills in the community,11 are foundational to continue driving digital transformation in healthcare. The importance of education and training in safe and effective use of digital technologies in healthcare is increasingly being recognised, but realising this in practice has been slow.12 This is concerning, particularly due to changing attitudes of the community regarding the use of digital health technologies in healthcare have changed.13,14 People increasingly expect the health system to be connected, more patient-centred, and digital technologies to improve rather than diminish equitable access to care.15 Confidence and capability using these digital technologies is a known driver to their adoption by the health workforce,12 so building workforce capacity in this area is key to ensure that the community sees the healthcare workforce as credible users of digital technologies.
The challenges that need to be overcome to realise a digitally enabled health workforce are complex (Box 1). In what follows, we draw on the discussion of an expert panel hosted by the Digital Health and Informatics Network at The University of Sydney in March 2023. The 40 min in-person panel had seven expert panellists, including two from industry, one from health services, two from government, two from academia, and chaired by an expert in health professions education and digital health. Structured prompts from the chair were used to guide discussion, followed by audience questions. The panel was audio recorded and the transcript subsequently reviewed by one researcher (AJ) to categorise key points and synthesise them into a summary of recommendations which was reviewed by all panellists and the chair, six of whom are authors on this publication (TS, AJ, MB, KQ, CI, PM).
Box 1.A set of interconnected challenges |
|
Addressing key workforce challenges
We must first agree on the essential skills for a digitally enabled care workforce. Currently various frameworks exist touting similar but different capabilities,4,19–21 making it challenging to develop a practical curriculum that teaches foundational skills for all experience levels in the care sector while distinguishing between the general and specialised workforce (Box 2). Investing in a digital health workforce may create new opportunities to attract talent to the health sector by creating opportunities for specialised digital health career pathways. It may also provide opportunities to support changes to the existing health workforce to adapt to increasing service demands by providing more efficient ways to support service delivery.22,23
Box 2.Examples of digital health workforce developments in Australia |
Formalised programs for the future digital health workforce
|
Professional training for health professionals in the workforce to upskill or specialise
|
Career pathway hubs
|
In our experience, we have seen many digital health implementations fail because of a lack of engagement. Digital health technologies should add value by improving the delivery of healthcare, but can instead produce unnecessary new time burdens, introduce new safety issues, or have other unintended consequences.23 Improving collaboration between healthcare providers, digital health technology industry, government agencies, and academia could reduce the duplication of investment and effort.
Adaptive but clear governance of emerging digital health technologies would help to standardise what is expected in practice and could be built into training. Although there is policy prioritising workforce capacity building,23,30–32 technology developments are outpacing the governance on their ethical, safe, and cost-effective use. While there are some examples of governance structures and mechanisms in place to support the safe design and implementation of digital health technologies, gaps in legislation remain in emerging areas such as use of artificial intelligence in healthcare.33
Recommendations
We make three key recommendations to support the growth of a digitally enabled workforce. These include upskilling of senior leaders and management, developing digital transformation change champions, and creating agile, adaptive, and applied training offerings (Box 3).
Senior leaders in healthcare need to be more comfortable operating digitally, both by supporting digital innovation but also being innovative and engaged themselves. New diverse and inclusive pathways are needed for a digital health workforce with a breadth of perspectives. Specialised digital health roles need to be created to attract and retain talent to the sector. This is important as there is evidence to suggest a sizeable portion of this workforce are volunteers with the intention to stop volunteering their time in the next 5 years.34
Change champions in the health system are those who are passionate and knowledgeable about the use of technology to support digital transformation. These individuals should play a role in workforce upskilling, particularly in areas where digital health capability frameworks have been developed less readily to date, such as primary and community care.35 Academic institutions should invest more heavily in specialised postgraduate training. This approach would help provide structured training opportunities for the digital health workforce which currently relies heavily on informal professional development activities, mentorship, and networking to support career development.34
Coupled with traditional educational vehicles, there is a need for new training opportunities that allow intensive and rapid upskilling such as micro- and nanocredentials.22 Digital health curriculums need to be more adaptive to respond to new digital technologies and changes in workforce needs.12,22 Training also needs to be designed in a way in which general principles can be clearly applied by learners in clinical practice.
Conclusion
In summary, researchers have long examined the skills the health workforce needs to use digital technologies, but recent events have led to substantial growth in interest in this area. Numerous challenges must be addressed to create a digitally enabled healthcare workforce, and no single solution exists.
While several organisations support digital health workforce development, initiatives often operate in silos. There remains a reliance on traditional education methods, such as diplomas and degrees, with insufficient focus on agile, practical training for current health professionals. Enhancing connections among healthcare organisations, the digital health industry, and academia is essential. This will help to standardise the capabilities expected of the whole care workforce, expand the specialist digital health workforce, and help coordinate an ecosystem of short-course training opportunities nationally.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable as no new data were generated or analysed during this study.
References
1 Topol E. The topol review. Preparing the healthcare workforce to deliver the digital future; 2019. pp. 1–48. Available at topol.hee.nhs.uk/downloads/the-topol-review-report/
2 Digitial Profession, Australian Government. Skills framework for the information age. 2024. Available at https://www.digitalprofession.gov.au/guides-and-resources/skills-framework-information-age
3 Department of Health Victoria. Digital health capability framework for allied health professionals. 2022. Available at https://www.health.vic.gov.au/digital-health/the-digital-health-capability-framework-for-allied-health-professionals
5 Gray K, Dattakumar A, Maeder A, Henderson KB, Chenery HJ. Advancing ehealth education for the clinical health professions: Final report 2014; 2014. Available at https://research.bond.edu.au/en/publications/advancing-ehealth-education-for-the-clinical-health-professions-f
6 Dattakumar A, Gray K, Henderson K-B, Maeder A, Chenery H. We are not educating the future clinical health professional workforce adequately for e-health competence: findings of an Australian study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 178: 33-38.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Australian Digital Health Agency. Australia’s national digital health strategy: Safe, seamless and secure: evolving health and care to meet the needs of modern Australia. 2016. Available at https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/Australia%27s%20National%20Digital%20Health%20Strategy%20-%20Safe%2C%20seamless%20and%20secure.pdf
8 Omboni S, Padwal RS, Alessa T, Benczúr B, Green BB, Hubbard I, et al. The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: current evidence and recommendations for the future. Conn Health Telemed 2022; 1: 7-35.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
9 Golinelli D, Boetto E, Carullo G, Nuzzolese AG, Landini MP, Fantini MP. Adoption of digital technologies in health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review of early scientific literature. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e22280.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Rich E, Gray S, Camacho Miñano MJ, MacIsaac S. Digital health education: Critical perspectives. Health Educ J 2024; 83: 00178969241255438.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
12 Woods L, Janssen A, Robertson S, Morgan C, Butler-Henderson K, Burton-Jones A, Sullivan C. The typing is on the wall: Australia’s healthcare future needs a digitally capable workforce. Aust Health Rev 2023; 47(5): 553-558.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Morrison C, Rimpiläinen S, Bosnic I. Emerging Trends in Digital Health and Care: A Refresh Post-COVID; 2022. Available at https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/82203/13/Morrison_etal_DHI_2022_Emerging_trends_in_digital_health_and_care_a_refresh_post_covid.pdf
14 Baxby L, Bennett S, Watson P, Judd R, Puri A, Chinthamuneedi M, et al. Australia’s health reimagined: the journey to a connected and confident consumer; 2022. Available at https://digitalhealthcrc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Australias-health-reimagined_Report_WEB_FINAL.pdf
16 Morris ME, Brusco NK, Jones J, Taylor NF, East CE, Semciw AI, Edvardsson K, Thwaites C, Bourke SL, Raza Khan U, Fowler-Davis S. The widening gap between the digital capability of the care workforce and technology-enabled healthcare delivery: a nursing and allied health analysis. Healthcare 2023; 11(7): 994.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
17 Australian Institute of Digital Health. Australian Digital Health Workforce Insights; 2023. Available at https://digitalhealth.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/AIDH_VMWare-Workforce-Insights_2023_V3.pdf
19 Lee CMY, Thomas E, Norman R, Wells L, Shaw T, Nesbitt J, et al. Educational attainment and willingness to use technology for health and to share health information–the reimagining healthcare survey. Int J Med Inform 2022; 164: 104803.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
21 Australian Medical Council. Capability framework in digital health in medicine. 2021. Available at https://www.amc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Digital-Health-in-Medicine-Capability-Framework-FINAL-19-August-2021.pdf [updated 19 August 2021].
22 Australian Medical Council Limited. Australian digital health agency and the Australian medical council: synthesis of evidence and recommendations for a capability framework in digital health in medicine. 2021. Available at https://www.amc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Milestone-6-Synthesis-of-Evidence-and-Recommendations-Digital-Health-in-Medicine-Capability-Framework-2021-Final-Version.pdf
23 Australian Digital Health Agency. Australian digital health agency workforce strategy 2021-2026. 2022. Available at https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/strategies-and-plans/workforce-strategy
24 Master of Digital Health and Data Science. The University of Sydney; 2024. Available at https://www.sydney.edu.au/courses/courses/pc/master-of-digital-health-and-data-science.html
25 Australian Digital Health Agency, The University of Sydney. Internship program: Building digital health skills for the future. 2024. Available at https://digitalhealthcrc.com/projects/internship-program-building-digital-health-skills-for-the-future/
26 Certified Health Informatician Australasia (CHIA). Get Certified in Digital Health. 2024. Available at https://www.healthinformaticscertification.com
27 Clinical Skills Development Service (CSDS). CSDS welcomes the Queensland Digital Academy. 2019. Available at https://csds.qld.edu.au/blog/csds-welcomes-the-queensland-digital-academy/
28 Digital Health CRC. Micro-credentials in digital health from RMIT-Digital Health CRC partnership. 2021. Available at https://digitalhealthcrc.com/rmit-microcredentials-digital-health/
29 Australasian Institute of Digital Health (AIDH). Welcome to the Digital Health Hub. 2024. Available at https://digitalhealthworkforce.org.au
30 Iyanna S, Kaur P, Ractham P, Talwar S, Islam AN. Digital transformation of healthcare sector. What is impeding adoption and continued usage of technology-driven innovations by end-users? J Bus Res 2022; 153: 150-161.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
31 Shanahan BW, Organ J. Harnessing the benefits of micro credentials for industry 4.0 and 5.0: skills training and lifelong learning. IFAC Pap OnLine 2022; 55: 82-87.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
33 Coiera EW, Verspoor K, Hansen DP. We need to chat about artificial intelligence. Med J Aust 2023; 219: 98-100.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
34 Butler-Henderson K, Gray K, Arabi S. Specialist digital health workforce census: Summary report. RMIT University; 2023. Available at https://www.rmit.edu.au/partner/hubs/digital-health-hub
35 Jimenez G, Spinazze P, Matchar D, Huat GKC, van der Kleij RM, Chavannes NH, et al. Digital health competencies for primary healthcare professionals: a scoping review. Int J Med Inform 2020; 143: 104260.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |