A quality improvement project to increase treatment rates of osteoporosis in general practice
Patrick Bolton A * , Markus Seibel B , Daniel Moses C , Michael Moore D and Brendan Goodger EA
B
C
D
E
Abstract
This study tests a model to improve the management of patients with an osteoporotic fracture.
Patients with fractures potentially due to osteoporosis were identified from imaging reports using computerised near natural language processing. A coordinator notified the referring GP about the finding and provided follow-up to remind GPs of the need for management. This provided an opportunity to assess action taken by the GP.
Near natural language processing efficiently detected fractures in patients at risk of osteoporosis. GPs reported that they are managing osteoporosis in over 40% of patients identified. Notification of GPs coincided with a small increase in osteoporosis management.
Information technology can identify patient populations with clinically important risks such as osteoporosis. Methods to engage GPs to optimally address this risk have yet to be developed.
Keywords: general practice/primary care, machine learning, osteoprosis, prevention.
References
1 Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. J Contin Educ Nurs 2015; 46(11): 501-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA. Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA 2007; 297(4): 387-94.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Milat F, Ebeling PR. Osteoporosis treatment: a missed opportunity. Med J Aust 2016; 205: 185-90.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Ganda K, Puech M, Chen J, Speerin R, Bleasel J, Center J, Eisman JA, March L, Seibel MJ. Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 393-406.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Cooper MS, Palmer AJ, Seibel MJ. Cost-effectiveness of the Concord Minimal Trauma Fracture Liaison service, a prospective, controlled fracture prevention study. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23(1): 97-107.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Yong JH, Masucci L, Hoch JS, Sujic R, Beaton D. Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27(1): 231-40.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Bolton P. A doctor’s duty to follow up preventable conditions: Young v Central Australian Aboriginal Congress: a bridge too far? North Territ LAW J 2012; 2(3): 154-75.
| Google Scholar |
9 O’Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, Oxman AD, Odgaard‐Jensen J, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD000409.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
10 Florentinus SR, Heerdink ER, van Dijk L, Griens AMG, Groenewegen PP, Leufkens HG. Is new drug prescribing in primary care specialist induced? BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9(1): 6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Blaker K, Wijewardene A, White E, Stokes G, Chong S, Ganda K, et al. Electronic search programs are effective in identifying patients with minimal trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 2022; 3: 435-441.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
12 The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice. 9th edn. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP; 2016. Available at https://www.racgp.org.au/FSDEDEV/media/documents/Clinical%20Resources/Guidelines/Red%20Book/Guidelines-for-preventive-activities-in-general-practice.pdf [cited 8 April 2023].
13 Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA, Hibbert PD, Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, et al. CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust 2012; 197(2): 100-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |