Clinical research imperatives: principles and priorities from the perspective of Allied Health executives and managers
Susan Hillier
A * , Duncan Lodge B , Jo Nolan C , Rosalie Yandell B , Anna Chur-Hansen D , Stacey George E and Elizabeth Lynch E
A
B
C
D
E
Abstract
It is widely understood that a key means of improving health systems and patient outcomes is through research – accessing, understanding, generating and applying research evidence-based practice. To promote more targeted and strategic research in Allied Health practice, this study sought to establish the principles, areas and priorities for clinical research as perceived by Allied Health leaders in the South Australian public health system.
The study used a mixed-methods design (full, sequential and equal model). Participants were recruited from the South Australian Department of Health and Wellbeing employment lists for Allied Health senior leaders. Consenting participants attended face-to-face focus groups; after an overview presentation, they discussed the principles for Allied Health research, followed by areas and priorities for research. Summaries of the responses were themed descriptively and circulated electronically so participants could confirm the research areas and ascribe priority ratings, clinical populations and services.
A total of 28 people attended the stakeholder forum (5 online); 20 responded to the second-round electronic summary. Nine principles of research action were agreed. Fourteen research areas were identified and prioritised. There was a relatively consistent prioritisation of measuring Allied Health value, Allied Health workforce, hospital avoidance and closing the gap for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples health outcomes – whether the individuals were thinking about their own service or the state as a whole.
Allied Health leadership identified key principles and priorities for research to improve service delivery and patient outcomes. These priorities should generate further discussion and interest for novice and experienced researchers and leaders and can be used to inform granting and project plans.
Keywords: allied health, health services research, models of care, mixed-methods, research priorities, research principles, patient outcomes, workforce.
References
1 Gee M, Cooke J. How do NHS organisations plan research capacity development? Strategies, strengths, and opportunities for improvement. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18(1): 198.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Whitworth A, Haining S, Stringer H. Enhancing research capacity across healthcare and higher education sectors: development and evaluation of an integrated model. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12(1): 287.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J, Taylor NF. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev 2017; 41(1): 45-53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Matus J, Walker A, Mickan S. Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals – a systematic review. BMC Health Ser Res 2018; 18(1): 716.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Allied Health Professions Australia. Allied health professions. 2023. Available at: https://ahpa.com.au/allied-health-professions/ [verified 2 June 2023].
6 Slade SC, Philip K, Morris ME. Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16(1): 29.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Golenko X, Pager S, Holden L. A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12(1): 276.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Pickstone C, Nancarrow S, Cooke J, et al. Building research capacity in the allied health professions. Evid Policy 2008; 4(1): 53-68.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
9 Davis A, Lee D-C, Wenzel L, et al. Setting research priorities within Allied Health: what do clinicians think? Int J Allied Health Sci Pract 2019; 17(1): art 6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
10 McKenna H, McDonough S, Keeney S, et al. Research priorities for the therapy professions in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. J Allied Health 2014; 43(2): 98-109.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 Redman S, Turner T, Davies H, et al. The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy. Soc Sci Med 2015; 136-137: 147-55.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 SA Health. Clinical Excellence: Developing Strategic Directions to Build Allied Health Research and Translation capacity. Available athttps://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/public+content/sa+health+internet/clinical+resources/clinical+governance+and+leadership/allied+and+scientific+health/research+and+evidence+informed+practice/allied+and+scientific+health+research+and+evidence+informed+practice#ClinicalExcellence:StrategicDirectionsforBuildingAlliedHealthResearchandTranslationCapacity [verified 29 February 2024]
13 Leech N, Onwuegbuzie A. A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant 2009; 43: 265-275.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
14 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psych 2006; 3: 77-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
15 Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349-357.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences. Research and Innovation as Core Functions in Transforming the Health System: A Vision for the Future of Health in Australia. Woolloongabba: Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences; 2022. Available at https://aahms.org/wp‐content/uploads/2022/10/AAHMS‐Vision‐Report.pdf [verified 2 June 2023].
17 Cusick A, Lannin N. On becoming a practitioner-researcher in remote northern Australia: personal commitment and resources compensate for structural deterrents to research. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30(26): 1984-98.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
18 Harper KJ, Taylor SL, Jepiuh M, Mino P, Huynh Tran A, Tam WY, Harris C. An observational cohort study to determine the impact of research capacity building strategies implemented in an Australian metropolitan hospital occupational therapy department. Aust Occup Ther J 2022; 69(2): 190-204.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Matus J, Tearne JE, Blyth K, et al. An evaluation of research capacity and culture in a sample of Western Australian Allied Health professionals. Tasman Med J 2020; 3(1): 23-9.
| Google Scholar |
20 Commonwealth of Australia. Australian Medical Research and Innovative Strategy 2021-2026. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care; 2023. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australian-medical-research-and-innovation-strategy-2021-2026?language=en [verified 2 June 2023].
21 Commonwealth of Australia. Australian Medical Research and Innovation Priorities 2020-2022. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care; 2023. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/mrff-australian-medical-research-and-innovation-priorities-2022-2024?language=en [verified 2 June 2023].
22 Charlesworth L, Hindle L, et al. Allied Health professions public health research priorities: a modified e-delphi study in the United Kingdom. Public Health Pract 2021; 2: 100201.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
23 Pager S, Holden L, Golenko X. Motivators, enablers, and barriers to building allied health research capacity. J Multidiscip Healthc 2012; 5: 53-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Treweek S, Miyakoda V, Burke D, Shiely F. Getting it wrong most of the time? Comparing trialists’ choice of primary outcome with what patients and health professionals want. Trials 2022; 23(1): 537.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
25 Ramage ER, Burke M, Galloway M, et al. Fit for purpose. Co-production of complex behavioural interventions. A practical guide and exemplar of co-producing a telehealth-delivered exercise intervention for people with stroke. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20(1): 2.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Rupa J, Laver K, Harvey G, et al. A ‘plethora of services’ but a lack of consistency: A qualitative study of service providers’ perspectives about transitioning from hospital to home for older South Australians. Australas J Ageing 2022; 41(4): e371-e378.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Research waste is still a scandal—an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers. BMJ 2018; 363: k4645.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
