Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Government-supported clinical knowledge and information resource portals are key to ensuring quality, safe health care and evidence-based practice – the Australian context

Gemma Siemensma https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2817-1528 A * , Alice Anderson https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2588-4538 B and Cassandra Gorton https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7438-8218 B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Library, Grampians Health, Ballarat, Vic., Australia.

B Library, Monash Health, Clayton, Vic., Australia.

* Correspondence to: gemma.siemensma@bhs.org.au

Australian Health Review 47(5) 596-601 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH23101
Submitted: 7 May 2023  Accepted: 11 August 2023   Published: 7 September 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA.

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to describe Australia’s government-supported clinical knowledge and information resource portals and their alignment with government policies for digital health within an Australian context, and to clarify the role of hospital libraries in the public health system as an adjunct to state and territory portals.

Methods

Government-supported clinical resource portals in Australian states and territories were examined and benchmarked. A comprehensive search of Australian state, territory, and federal government websites was conducted for strategies, policies, and projects relating to medical research, digital health, and health workforce education. These documents were screened for reference to clinical knowledge and information resource portals, clinical decision support tools, hospital libraries, or educational resources for the health workforce. Additionally, information was derived from relevant published Australian studies to provide context and additional information about access to evidence in public hospitals.

Results

Clinical resource portals are a vital part of evidence-based health care in Australia; however, there are inconsistencies in these portals due to differences in policy, funding, and strategy between Australia’s states and territories. Libraries in the healthcare sector play a key role in ensuring centralised clinical knowledge and information resource portals are easily available to clinicians, and in building on the initial portal collection, curate bespoke library collections for their individual organisations.

Conclusion

This investigation highlights the importance of government-supported clinical knowledge and information resource portals and the role they play in the provision of safe, quality, evidence-based health care. These portals, in conjunction with hospital library activities, are an integral part of the clinical governance framework.

Keywords: education and training, evidence based practice, governance, government policy, health libraries, health services research, information management, quality and safety.

References

Macfarlane AJR. What is clinical governance? BJA Educ 2019; 19(6): 174-175.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Titler M. The evidence for evidence-based practice implementation. In: Hughes RG,. Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2659/

Khammarnia M, Haj Mohammadi M, Amani Z, Rezaeian S, Setoodehzadeh F. Barriers to implementation of evidence based practice in Zahedan teaching hospitals, Iran, 2014. Nurs Res Pract 2015; 2015: 357140.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yoo JY, Kim JH, Kim JS, Kim HL, Ki JS. Clinical nurses’ beliefs, knowledge, organizational readiness and level of implementation of evidence-based practice: The first step to creating an evidence-based practice culture. PLoS One 2019; 14(12): e0226742.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Smith JR, Donze A. Assessing environmental readiness: First steps in developing an evidence-based practice implementation culture. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2010; 24(1): 61-71.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Daei A, Soleymani MR, Ashrafi‐rizi H, Kelishadi R, Zargham‑Boroujeni A. Personal, technical and organisational factors affect whether physicians seek answers to clinical questions during patient care: A literature review. Health Info Libr J 2021; 38(2): 81-96.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Swanberg SM, Dennison CC, Farrell A, Machel V, Marton C, O’Brien KK, Pannabecker V, Thuna M, Holyoke AN. Instructional methods used by health sciences librarians to teach evidence-based practice (EBP): a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc 2016; 104(3): 197-208.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gaspard CS, Prentice KA. Focused library instruction for occupational therapy, physical therapy, and respiratory care students and faculty: Library instruction in allied health. Med Ref Serv Q 2014; 33(3): 335-342.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

MacDonald KA, Hrynchak PK, Spafford MM. Evidence-based practice instruction by faculty members and librarians in North American optometry and ophthalmology programs. J Med Libr Assoc 2014; 102(3): 210-215.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

10  Blake L, Ballance D. Teaching evidence-based practice in the hospital and the library: two different groups, one course. Med Ref Serv Q 2013; 32(1): 100-110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

11  Brettle A, Maden-Jenkins M, Anderson L, McNally R, Pratchett T, Tancock J, Thornton D, Webb A. Evaluating clinical librarian services: a systematic review. Health Info Libr J 2011; 28(1): 3-22.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

12  Wolters Kluwer. UpToDate workflow integrations. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2022. Available at https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/uptodate/uptodate/ehr-and-partner-integrations

13  EBSCO. DynaMed – Incorporate evidence-based clinical information into the HER. Ipswich, MA: EBSCO; 2020. Available at https://bibliothek.charite.de/fileadmin/user_upload/microsites/sonstige/bibliothek/Downloads/DynaMed-EHR-Integration-en.pdf

14  BMJ. BMJ Best Practice selected for EHR integration. London: BMJ; 2021. Available at https://www.bmj.com/company/newsroom/bmj-best-practice-selected-for-ehr-integration/

15  World Health Organization. Infodemic. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Available at https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1

16  Parliament of Australia. Infosheet 20 - The Australian system of government. Canberra, ACT: Parliament of Australia; 2022. Available at https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_20_-_The_Australian_system_of_government

17  Department of Health, Victoria. Victoria’s digital health roadmap: Improving patient care by lifting digital maturity in Victoria’s public health services 2021–2025. Melbourne, Vic.: Department of Health; 2021. Available at https://content.health.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-11/victorias-digital-health-roadmap.pdf

18  Department of Health, Victoria. Clinicians Health Channel. Melbourne, Vic.: State Government of Victoria; 2021. Available at https://www.clinicians.vic.gov.au/

19  NSW Government, eHealth. CIAP – Clinicians Information Access Portal. Sydney, NSW: NSW Government; 2022. Available at https://www.ciap.health.nsw.gov.au/

20  Tasmanian Department of Health. EPOCH - ePortal for Online Clinical Help. Hobart, Tas.: Tasmanian Department of Health; 2022. Available at https://epoch.health.tas.gov.au/

21  Queensland Health. Clinical Knowledge Network (CKN). Brisbane, Qld: Queensland Health; 2017. Available at https://www.ckn.org.au/

22  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. The NSQHS standards. Canberra: ACSQHC; 2019. Available at https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs-standards

23  Ritchie A, Gilbert C, Gaca M, Siemensma G, Taylor J. Hospital librarians’ contributions to health services’ accreditation: an account of the Health Libraries for the National Safety and Quality in Health Services Standards (HeLiNS) research project, 2016-18. J Aust Lib Info Assoc 2020; 69(2): 215-245.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

24  Australian Institute of Health & Welfare. Australia’s health 2020. Canberra: AIHW; 2020. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/australias-health

25  Queensland Health. Digital Health Strategic Vision for Queensland 2026. Brisbane, Qld: Queensland Health; 2017. Available at https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/645010/digital-health-strat-vision.pdf

26  Government of Western Australia, Department of Health. WA Health Digital Strategy. Perth, WA: Government of Western Australia, Department of Health; 2020. Available at https://www.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Files/Corporate/Reports-and-publications/Digital-strategy/Digital-Strategy-2020-2030.pdf

27  Wang Y, Mi J. Searchability and discoverability of library resources: Federated search and beyond. College Undergrad Libr 2012; 19(2–4): 229-245.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

28  Australian Digital Health Agency. Safe, seamless and secure: evolving health and care to meet the needs of modern Australia - Australia’s National Digital Health Strategy. Canberra, ACT: Australian Digital Health Agency; 2018. Available at https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/Australia%27s%20National%20Digital%20Health%20Strategy%20-%20Safe%2C%20seamless%20and%20secure.pdf

29  Department of Health, Victoria. Rural public health care agencies’ information and communications technology (ICT) Alliance Policy. Melbourne, Vic.: Department of Health; 2022. Available at https://www.health.vic.gov.au/digital-health/rural-public-health-care-agencies-information-and-communications-technology

30  NSW Government, eHealth. CIAP – Clinicians Information Access Portal usage data. Sydney, NSW: NSW Government; 2020. Available at https://www.ciap.health.nsw.gov.au/about/usage.html

31  Bari A, Khan RA, Rathore AW. Medical errors; causes, consequences, emotional response and resulting behavioral change. Pak J Med Sci 2016; 32(3): 523-528.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

32  NSW Health. eHealth Strategy for NSW Health 2016-2026. Sydney, NSW: NSW Health; 2016. Available at https://ehealth.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/725956/eHealth-Strategy-for-NSW-Health-2016-2026.pdf

33  ACT Health. Better together: A strategic plan for research in the ACT health system 2022–2030. Canberra, ACT: ACT Health; 2022. Available at https://www.health.act.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-07/Research%20Strategic%20Plan.pdf

34  State of Victoria. Melbourne biomedical precinct: From research engine to economic powerhouse. Melbourne, Vic.: State of Victoria; 2018. Available at https://www.melbournebiomed.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/DPC_MBP-Strategic-Plan_WEB.pdf

35  Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences. Research and innovation as core functions in transforming the health system: A vision for the future of health in Australia. Brisbane, Qld: Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences; 2022. Available at https://aahms.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/AAHMS-Vision-Report.pdf