Digital disruption ‘syndromes’ in a hospital: important considerations for the quality and safety of patient care during rapid digital transformation
Clair Sullivan A B C D and Andrew Staib A B C DA Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia.
B Health Improvement Unit, Clinical Excellence Division, Butterfield Street, Herston, Qld 4066, Australia.
C MMRI, Translational Research Institute, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia.
D Corresponding authors. Email: Clair.Sullivan@health.qld.gov.au; Andrew.Staib@health.qld.gov.au
Australian Health Review 42(3) 294-298 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16294
Submitted: 13 January 2017 Accepted: 20 March 2017 Published: 18 May 2017
Abstract
The digital transformation of hospitals in Australia is occurring rapidly in order to facilitate innovation and improve efficiency. Rapid transformation can cause temporary disruption of hospital workflows and staff as processes are adapted to the new digital workflows. The aim of this paper is to outline various types of digital disruption and some strategies for effective management. A large tertiary university hospital recently underwent a rapid, successful roll-out of an integrated electronic medical record (EMR). We observed this transformation and propose several digital disruption “syndromes” to assist with understanding and management during digital transformation: digital deceleration, digital transparency, digital hypervigilance, data discordance, digital churn and post-digital ‘depression’. These ‘syndromes’ are defined and discussed in detail. Successful management of this temporary digital disruption is important to ensure a successful transition to a digital platform.
What is known about this topic? Digital disruption is defined as the changes facilitated by digital technologies that occur at a pace and magnitude that disrupt established ways of value creation, social interactions, doing business and more generally our thinking. Increasing numbers of Australian hospitals are implementing digital solutions to replace traditional paper-based systems for patient care in order to create opportunities for improved care and efficiencies. Such large scale change has the potential to create transient disruption to workflows and staff. Managing this temporary disruption effectively is an important factor in the successful implementation of an EMR.
What does this paper add? A large tertiary university hospital recently underwent a successful rapid roll-out of an integrated electronic medical record (EMR) to become Australia’s largest digital hospital over a 3-week period. We observed and assisted with the management of several cultural, behavioural and operational forms of digital disruption which lead us to propose some digital disruption ‘syndromes’. The definition and management of these ‘syndromes’ are discussed in detail.
What are the implications for practitioners? Minimising the temporary effects of digital disruption in hospitals requires an understanding that these digital ‘syndromes’ are to be expected and actively managed during large-scale transformation.
Additional keywords: eHealth, health systems.
References
[1] Riemer KGU, Hamann J. Digital disruption intermediaries. Sydney: University of Sydney; 2015. Available at: https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au//bitstream/2123/12761/7/ADTL_Digital%20Disruptive%20Intermediaries-final.pdf [verified 20 June 2016].[2] Keasberry J, Scott IA, Sullivan C, Staib A, Ashby R. Going digital: a narrative overview of the clinical and organisational impacts of eHealth technologies in hospital practice. Aust Health Rev 2017;
| Going digital: a narrative overview of the clinical and organisational impacts of eHealth technologies in hospital practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Sullivan C, Staib A, Ayre S, Daly M, Collins R, Draheim M, Ashby R. Pioneering digital disruption: Australia’s first integrated digital tertiary hospital. Med J Aust 2016; 205 386–9.
| Pioneering digital disruption: Australia’s first integrated digital tertiary hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Barnett ML, Mehrotra A, Jena AB. Adverse inpatient outcomes during the transition to a new electronic health record system: observational study. BMJ 2016; 354 i3835
| Adverse inpatient outcomes during the transition to a new electronic health record system: observational study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Wears R. When hospitals switch to electronic records. BMJ 2016; 354 i3941
| When hospitals switch to electronic records.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Yen K, Shane EL, Pawar SS, Schwendel ND, Zimmanck RJ, Gorelick MH. Time motion study in a pediatric emergency department before and after computer physician order entry. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 53 462–8e1.
| Time motion study in a pediatric emergency department before and after computer physician order entry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Lee JMJ, Town R. The impact of health information technology on hospital productivity. Rand J Econ 2013; 44 545–68.
| The impact of health information technology on hospital productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Tall JM, Hurd M, Gifford T. Minimal impact of an electronic medical records system. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33 663–6.
| Minimal impact of an electronic medical records system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Ward MJ, Landman AB, Case K, Berthelot J, Pilgrim RL, Pines JM. The effect of electronic health record implementation on community emergency department operational measures of performance. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 63 723–30.
| The effect of electronic health record implementation on community emergency department operational measures of performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Schmitt KF, Wofford DA. Financial analysis projects clear returns from electronic medical records. Healthc Financ Manage 2002; 56 52–7.
[11] Randeree E. Exploring physician adoption of EMRs: a multi-case analysis. J Med Syst 2007; 31 489–96.
| Exploring physician adoption of EMRs: a multi-case analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Spellman Kennebeck S, Timm N, Farrell MK, Spooner SA. Impact of electronic health record implementation on patient flow metrics in a pediatric emergency department. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 443–7.
| Impact of electronic health record implementation on patient flow metrics in a pediatric emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Vogelsmeier AA, Halbesleben JR, Scott-Cawiezell JR. Technology implementation and workarounds in the nursing home. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15 114–19.
| Technology implementation and workarounds in the nursing home.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Kelsey T. Transparency in the NHS not only saves lives – it is a fundamental human right. The Guardian 13 Mar 2013. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/mar/12/nhs-transparency-open-data-initiative [verified 21 June 2016].
[15] Lorenzi NM, Kouroubali A, Detmer DE, Bloomrosen M. How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009; 9 15
| How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Seidlitz WB, Jennings B, LaRocca R. Electronic health records in my unit? No thanks. Can J Nurs Informatics 2012; 7 Available at: cjni.net/journal?p=2356 [verified 5 April 2017].
[17] Malloch K, Porter-O’Grady T, Weberg D, Davidson S. Leadership for evidence-based innovation in nursing and health professions. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Learing; 2016.
[18] Monegain B. Denver Health CIO, COO quit, blame pricey Epic EHR installation, report says. 12 Jan 2016. Available at: http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/denver-health-cio-coo-quit-blame-pricey-epic-ehr-installation-report-says [verified 21 June 2016].
[19] Diamond D. Why doctors really quit USA. 2 Jun 2015. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dandiamond/2015/06/02/why-doctors-really-quit/#5cf1323b7621 [verified 21 June 2016].
[20] Rantz MJ, Hicks L, Petroski GF, Madsen RW, Alexander G, Galambos C, Conn V. Cost, staffing and quality impact of bedside electronic medical record (EMR) in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2010; 11 485–93.
| Cost, staffing and quality impact of bedside electronic medical record (EMR) in nursing homes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Hummel J, Evans P. EHR implementation with minimal practice disruption in primary care settings Seattle. 2012. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/ehr-implementation-wirec.pdf [verified 5 April 2017].
