Physiotherapists’ perceptions of workplace competency: a mixed-methods observational study
Rodney Sturt A C , Angela T. Burge A B , Paula Harding A and James Sayer AA Alfred Health, The Alfred, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia. Email: p.harding@alfred.org.au; j.sayer@alfred.org.au
B La Trobe University, Latrobe Avenue, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia. Email: A.Burge@latrobe.edu.au
C Corresponding author. Email: r.sturt@cgmc.org.au
Australian Health Review 42(4) 461-468 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16148
Submitted: 4 July 2016 Accepted: 28 April 2017 Published: 22 June 2017
Abstract
Objectives Workplace-based competency is increasingly considered fundamental to patient safety and quality healthcare. The aim of the present study was to identify and describe physiotherapists’ perceptions of workplace competency.
Methods The present study was a mixed-methods cross-sectional observational study. Thematic and descriptive analysis of qualitative and survey data were undertaken. Forty-six physiotherapists employed at a metropolitan acute public hospital participated in interviews or focus groups; a subgroup of 31 participants also completed an online survey.
Results Five main themes were identified: (1) despite the availability of workplace learning opportunities and supports, less-experienced staff reported limited confidence; (2) assessment and feedback around workplace competency was limited, predominantly informal and unstructured, with less than half of the cohort (42%) agreeing feedback received was useful for improving their workplace skills; (3) practicing within individual scope is an important aspect of workplace competency as a physiotherapist; (4) most (81%) agreed it was important for them to self-determine their learning and development goals, and they relied primarily on informal discussion to achieve these goals; and, (5) physiotherapists felt motivated regarding workplace learning, with 97% interested in developing their workplace skills however, nearly half (45%) did not feel they had sufficient time to do so.
Conclusions The perceptions of physiotherapists working in a metropolitan acute public hospital are reflected in five themes. These themes elucidate how workplace competency is supported, maintained and developed among physiotherapists in this setting. These themes also highlight key challenges of workplace learning faced by this cohort of physiotherapists and allude to methods that may assist with improving feedback mechanisms and knowledge acquisition.
What is known about this topic? Studies investigating employee perceptions around workplace competency, knowledge, skills and learning are found across a range of industries. Workplace-based competency is increasingly considered fundamental to patient safety and quality health care. There is little known about physiotherapists’ perceptions of workplace competency.
What does this paper add? This study has identified and described themes around physiotherapists’ perceptions of their workplace knowledge and skills.
What are the implications for practitioners? The themes identified provide support for the development, implementation and evaluation of a workplace-based competency framework for physiotherapists.
References
[1] Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, Kistnasamy B, Meleis A, Naylor D, Pablos-Mendez A, Reddy S, Scrimshaw S, Sepulveda J, Serwadda D, Zurayk H. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010; 376 1923–58.| Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Sandberg J. Understanding human competence at work: an interpretative approach. Acad Manage J 2000; 43 9–25.
| Understanding human competence at work: an interpretative approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Garavan TN, McGuire D. Competencies and workplace learning: some reflections on the rhetoric and the reality. J Workplace Learn 2001; 13 144–64.
| Competencies and workplace learning: some reflections on the rhetoric and the reality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Stoof A, Martens RL, Van Merrienboer J, Bastiaens T. The boundary approach of competence: a constructivist aid for understanding and using the concept of competence. Hum Resour Dev Rev 2002; 1 345–65.
| The boundary approach of competence: a constructivist aid for understanding and using the concept of competence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] State of Victoria, Department of Health and Human Services. Allied health: credentialling, competency and capability framework (revised edition). 2016. Available at: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/health-workforce/allied-health-workforce/allied-health-ccc-framework [verified 22 May 2017].
[6] Norcini J, Anderson B, Valeds B, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V, Roberts T. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach 2011; 33 206–14.
| Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Australian Physiotherapy Council. Physiotherapy practice thresholds in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. 2015. Available at: http://www.physiotherapyboard.gov.au/documents/default.aspx?record=WD15%2f16750&dbid=AP&chksum=LWuk27uBUFj5MTUort6Qug%3d%3d [verified 4 September 2015].
[8] Dalton M, Davidson M, Keating J. The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a valid measure of professional competence of physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional study with Rasch analysis. J Physiother 2011; 57 239–46.
| The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a valid measure of professional competence of physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional study with Rasch analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Harding P, Prescott J, Sayer J, Pearce A. Advanced musculoskeletal physiotherapy clinical education framework supporting an emerging new workforce. Aust Health Rev 2015; 39 271–82.
| Advanced musculoskeletal physiotherapy clinical education framework supporting an emerging new workforce.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Coetzer A. Employee perceptions of their workplaces as learning environments. J Workplace Learn 2007; 19 417–34.
| Employee perceptions of their workplaces as learning environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Hoekstra A, Korthagen F, Brekelmans M, Beijaard D, Imants J. Experienced teachers’ informal workplace learning and perceptions of workplace conditions. J Workplace Learn 2009; 21 276–98.
| Experienced teachers’ informal workplace learning and perceptions of workplace conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Wareing M. Using vignettes to explore work-based learning. Br J Nurs 2010; 19 1185–8.
| Using vignettes to explore work-based learning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Miller P, Cooper A, Eva K. Factors predicting competence as assessed with the written component of the Canadian Physiotherapy Competency Examination. Physiother Theory Pract 2010; 26 12–21.
| Factors predicting competence as assessed with the written component of the Canadian Physiotherapy Competency Examination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Bunniss S, Kelly D. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ 2010; 44 358–66.
| Research paradigms in medical education research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Victorian Hospital Industrial Association (VHIA). Victorian public health sector (health professionals, health and allied services, managers and administrative officers) multiple enterprise agreement 2011–2015. 2013. Available at: http://www.westernhealth.org.au/Careers/Documents/Awards/Health_Allied_Mgrs_Admin/Health%20Prof-Health%20Allied-Managers%20and%20Admin%20Officers%20Agreement%202011-2015final.pdf [verified 5 September 2015].
[16] Tones MJ, Pillay HK. The learning and development survey: further evaluation of its psychometric properties. Aust J Educ Dev Psychol 2008; 8 85–97.
[17] Lloyd B, Pfeiffer D, Dominish J, Heading G, Schmidt D, McCluskey A. The New South Wales Allied Health Workplace Learning Study: barriers and enablers to learning in the workplace. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14 134
| The New South Wales Allied Health Workplace Learning Study: barriers and enablers to learning in the workplace.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Cummins A. Clinical supervision: the way forward? A review of the literature. Nurse Educ Pract 2009; 9 215–20.
| Clinical supervision: the way forward? A review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Brunero S, Stein-Parbury J. The effectiveness of clinical supervision in nursing: an evidenced based literature review. Aust J Adv Nurs 2008; 25 86–94.
[20] Saxby C, Wilson J, Newcombe P. Can clinical supervision sustain our workforce in the current healthcare landscape? Findings from a Queensland study of allied health professionals. Aust Health Rev 2015; 39 476–82.
| Can clinical supervision sustain our workforce in the current healthcare landscape? Findings from a Queensland study of allied health professionals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Sellars J. Learning from contemporary practice: an exploration of clinical supervision in physiotherapy. Learn Health Soc Care 2004; 3 64–82.
| Learning from contemporary practice: an exploration of clinical supervision in physiotherapy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007; 77 81–112.
| The power of feedback.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Embo M, Driessen E, Valcke M, van der Vleuten C. Integrating learning, assessment and supervision in a competency framework for clinical workplace education. Nurse Educ Today 2015; 35 341–6.
| Integrating learning, assessment and supervision in a competency framework for clinical workplace education.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2Mznt1WisQ%3D%3D&md5=74dc16cd63a838a7263d1d5f7908297cCAS |
[24] Redpath A, Gill S, Finlay N, Brennan F, Hakkenes S. Public sector physiotherapists believe that staff supervision should be broad ranging, individualised, structured, and based on needs and goals: a qualitative study. J Physiother 2015; 61 210–16.
| Public sector physiotherapists believe that staff supervision should be broad ranging, individualised, structured, and based on needs and goals: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Shute V. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 2008; 78 153–89.
| Focus on formative feedback.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J, Jolly B. AMEE guide no. 27: effective educational and clinical supervision Med Teach 2007; 29 2–19.
| AMEE guide no. 27: effective educational and clinical supervisionCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool. Med Teach 2007; 29 855–71.
| Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Hauer K, Holmboe E, Kogan J. Twelve tips for implementing tools for direct observation of medical trainees’ clinical skills during patient encounters. Med Teach 2011; 33 27–33.
| Twelve tips for implementing tools for direct observation of medical trainees’ clinical skills during patient encounters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Boursicot K, Etheridege L, Setna Z, Sturrock A, Ker J, Smee S, Sambandam E. Performance in assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa Conference. Med Teach 2011; 33 370–83.
| Performance in assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa Conference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Le Maistre C, Boudreau S, Pare A. Mentor or evaluator? Assisting and assessing newcomers to the professions. J Workplace Learn 2006; 18 344–54.
| Mentor or evaluator? Assisting and assessing newcomers to the professions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Eraut M. Informal learning in the workplace. Stud Contin Educ 2004; 26 247–3.
[32] Newton JM, Henderson A, Jolly B, Greaves J. A contemporary examination of workplace learning culture: an ethnomethodology study. Nurse Educ Today 2015; 35 91–6.
| A contemporary examination of workplace learning culture: an ethnomethodology study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
