Are wait lists inevitable in subacute ambulatory and community health services? A qualitative analysis
Katherine E. Harding A B G , Nicole Robertson B , David A. Snowdon B , Jennifer J. Watts C , Leila Karimi A D , Mary O’Reilly B E , Michelle Kotis F and Nicholas F. Taylor A BA La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia. Email: l.karimi@latrobe.edu.au; n.taylor@latrobe.edu.au
B Eastern Health, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Vic. 3128, Australia. Email: nicole.robertson@easternhealth.org.au; david.snowdon@easternhealth.org.au; mary.oreilly@easternhealth.org.au
C Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia. Email: j.watts@deakin.edu.au
D School of Insurance and Public Health, Ilia State University, Kakutsa Cholokashvili Ave 3/5 Tbilisi 0162, Georgia.
E Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia.
F Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia. Email: michelle.kotis@dhhs.vic.gov.au
G Corresponding author. Email: katherine.harding@easternhealth.org.au
Australian Health Review 42(1) 93-99 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16145
Submitted: 1 July 2016 Accepted: 9 December 2016 Published: 30 January 2017
Abstract
Objectives Wait lists are common in ambulatory and community-based services. The aim of the present study was to explore managers’ perceptions of factors that contribute to wait times.
Methods A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with managers and team leaders of ambulatory and community health services within a large health network. Interviews were transcribed and coded, and the codes were then grouped into themes and subthemes.
Results Representatives from 26 services participated in the project. Four major themes were identified. Three themes related to reasons and factors contributing to increased wait time for services (inefficient intake and scheduling processes; service disruptions due to human resource issues; and high service demand). A fourth theme related to staff attitudes towards wait times and acceptance and acknowledgement of wait lists.
Conclusions Service providers perceive high demand to be a key driver of wait times, but a range of other factors also contributes and may represent opportunities for improving access to care. These other factors include improving process efficiencies, greater consistency of service delivery through more efficient management of human resources and shifting to more consumer-centred approaches in measuring wait times in order to drive improvements in patient flow.
What is known about the topic? Wait times are common in out-patient and ambulatory services. These services experience high demand, which is likely to continue to grow as health service delivery shifts from hospital to community settings.
What does this paper add? Although demand is an important driver of wait times, there are other modifiable factors that also contribute, including process inefficiencies and service disruption related to human resource issues. An underlying staff attitude of acceptance of wait times appears to be an additional barrier to improving access.
What are the implications for practitioners? The findings of the present study suggest that there are opportunities for improving access to ambulatory and community health services through more efficient use of existing resources. However, a more consumer-focused approach regarding acceptability of wait times is needed to help drive change.
References
[1] McCarthy K, McGee HM, O’Boyle CA. Outpatient clinic waiting times and non-attendance as indicators of quality. Psychol Health Med 2000; 5 287–93.| Outpatient clinic waiting times and non-attendance as indicators of quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Olshaker JS, Rathlev NK. Emergency department overcrowding and ambulance diversion: the impact and potential solutions of extended boarding of admitted patients in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2006; 30 351–6.
| Emergency department overcrowding and ambulance diversion: the impact and potential solutions of extended boarding of admitted patients in the emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Viberg N, Forsberg BC, Borowitz M, Molin R. International comparisons of waiting times in health care – limitations and prospects. Health Policy 2013; 112 53–61.
| International comparisons of waiting times in health care – limitations and prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Brown AM, Pirotta M. Determining priority of access to physiotherapy at Victorian community health services. Aust Health Rev 2011; 35 178–84.
[5] Russell KL, Holloway TM, Brum M, Caruso V, Chessex C, Grace SL. Cardiac rehabilitation wait times: effect on enrolment. J Mol Signal 2011; 31 373–7.
[6] Lynch ME, Campbell F, Clark AJ, Dunbar MJ, Goldstein D, Peng P, Stinson J, Tupper H. A systematic review of the effect of waiting for treatment for chronic pain. Pain 2008; 136 97–116.
| A systematic review of the effect of waiting for treatment for chronic pain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Grilli L, Feldman DE, Swaine B, Gosselin J, Champagne F, Pineault R. Wait times for paediatric rehabilitation. Healthc Policy 2007; 2 e171–87.
[8] Monitor. Moving healthcare closer to home: summary. 2015. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_ data/file/459400/moving_healthcare_closer_to_home_summary.pdf [verified 30 June 2016].
[9] Murray M, Berwick DM. Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. JAMA 2003; 289 1035–40.
| Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Kreindler SA. Watching your wait: evidence-informed strategies for reducing health care wait times. Qual Manag Health Care 2008; 17 128–35.
| Watching your wait: evidence-informed strategies for reducing health care wait times.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Raymond MH, Demers L, Feldman DE. Waiting list management practices for home-care occupational therapy in the province of Quebec, Canada. Health Soc Care Community 2015; 24 154–64.
| Waiting list management practices for home-care occupational therapy in the province of Quebec, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Kvale S. Doing interviews. London: Sage Publishing; 2007.
[13] Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press; 2009.
[14] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s health 2014: in brief. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.
[15] Kenis P. Waiting lists in Dutch healthcare: an analysis from an organization theoretical perspective. J Health Organ Manag 2006; 20 294–308.
| Waiting lists in Dutch healthcare: an analysis from an organization theoretical perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Harding KE, Leggat S, Bowers B, Stafford M, Taylor NF. Reducing waiting time for community rehabilitation services: a controlled before and after trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94 23–31.
| Reducing waiting time for community rehabilitation services: a controlled before and after trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Harding KE, Taylor NF, Leggat S. Do triage systems in healthcare improve patient flow? A systematic review of the literature. Aust Health Rev 2011; 35 371–83.
| Do triage systems in healthcare improve patient flow? A systematic review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Taylor N, Bottrell J, Lawler K, Benjamin D. Mobile phone short message service (SMS) reminders can reduce non-attendance in physical therapy outpatient clinics: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93 21–6.
| Mobile phone short message service (SMS) reminders can reduce non-attendance in physical therapy outpatient clinics: a randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Curran A, Flynn C, Antonijevic-Elliott S, Lyons R. Non-attendance and utilization of a speech and language therapy service: a retrospective pilot study of school-aged referrals. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2015; 50 665–75.
| Non-attendance and utilization of a speech and language therapy service: a retrospective pilot study of school-aged referrals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Kogan-Liberman D, Rivas Y, Thompson J, Tomer G. Improving nonattendance at outpatient pediatric endoscopy unit of a tertiary center. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015; 61 234–7.
| Improving nonattendance at outpatient pediatric endoscopy unit of a tertiary center.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Hobbs J, Boysen J, McGarry K, Thompson J, Nordrum J. Development of a unique triage system for acute care physical therapy and occupational therapy services: an administrative case report. Phys Ther 2010; 90 1519–29.
| Development of a unique triage system for acute care physical therapy and occupational therapy services: an administrative case report.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Maddison P, Jones J, Breslin A, Barton C, Fleur J, Lewis R, McSweeney L, Norgain C, Smith S, Thomas C, Tillson C. Improved access and targeting of musculoskeletal services in northwest Wales: targeted early access to musculoskeletal services (TEAMS) programme. BMJ 2004; 329 1325–7.
| Improved access and targeting of musculoskeletal services in northwest Wales: targeted early access to musculoskeletal services (TEAMS) programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Williams I, Robinson S, Dickinson H. Rationing in health care: the theory and practice of priority setting. Chicago: The Policy Press; 2012.
[24] Robertson B, Harding K. Outcomes with individual versus group physical therapy for treating urinary incontinence and low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95 2187–98.
| Outcomes with individual versus group physical therapy for treating urinary incontinence and low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Coulter A. After Bristol: putting patients at the centre. BMJ 2002; 324 648–51.
| After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Harding KE, Leggat S, Bowers B, Stafford M, Taylor NF. Perspectives of clinicians and patients following introduction of a new model of triage that reduced waiting time: a qualitative analysis. Aust Health Rev 2013; 33 324–30.
[27] Harding K, Bottrell J. Specific timely appointments for triage (STAT) reduced waiting lists in an outpatient physiotherapy service. Physiotherapy 2015; 102 345–50.
| Specific timely appointments for triage (STAT) reduced waiting lists in an outpatient physiotherapy service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Murray M, Bodenheimer T, Rittenhouse D, Grumbach K. Improving timely access to primary care: case studies of the advanced access model. JAMA 2003; 289 1042–6.
| Improving timely access to primary care: case studies of the advanced access model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] McCaughey D, Erwin CO, DelliFraine JL. Improving capacity management in the emergency department: a review of the literature, 2000–2012. Journal Healthcare Manage 2015; 60 63–75.
[30] The Health Foundation. Getting out of hospital? The evidence for shifting acute inpatient and day case services from hospitals into the community. 2011. Available at: http://www.health.org.uk/publication/getting-out-hospital [verified 12 December 2016].
