Knowledge and motivation: two elements of health literacy that remain low with regard to nurse practitioners in Australia
Andrew Cashin A E , Marie Heartfield A , Darlene Cox B , Sandra Dunn C and Helen Stasa DA School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.
B Health Care Consumers’ Association Inc, 100 Maitland Street, Hackett, ACT 2602, Australia.
C Clinical Practice, School of Health, Casurina Campus, Charles Darwin University, NT 0811, Australia.
D Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: andrew.cashin@scu.edu.au
Australian Health Review 39(4) 470-475 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14126
Submitted: 6 August 2014 Accepted: 15 January 2015 Published: 10 March 2015
Abstract
Objective This paper presents analysis of consumer focus groups that were undertaken as a part of the project to develop the now current Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia’s Nurse Practitioner Standards for Practice.
Methods Six focus groups were conducted with consumers around Australia, including urban and remote areas. One purpose for these groups was to explore what was known of nurse practitioners and whether consumers could articulate the difference between the regulated titles of enrolled nurse, registered nurse and nurse practitioner.
Results Consumers’ knowledge of nurses’ roles in the Australian primary healthcare system, and hence system literacy (particularly in terms of navigating the system), was low. Of perhaps greatest importance is the fact that those consumers with low health systems literacy also exhibited a low level of motivation to seek new knowledge. Many consumers relied on the medical profession to direct care.
Conclusion The low levels of health literacy raise questions of how to meaningfully include health consumers in innovative health-related policy work.
What is known about the topic? Health literacy includes individual attributes and those of the system in which the context of care is placed. Individual attributes include not only knowledge and confidence but also motivation. It is known that consumer knowledge related to the nursing workforce is low.
What does this paper add ? This paper adds the finding that along with knowledge that consumer motivation is low to find out more about the nursing workforce in general. This finding extends to Nurse Practitioners in particular. This is occurring in the context of frequent contact with nurses in the context in which care is received.
What are the implications for practitioners? This finding informs strategies to build health literacy in the community, as the approach that will lead to success is clearly not just one of providing accessible information. The factor of motivation warrants attention.
References
[1] American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Historical timeline. 2013. Available at: http://www.aanp.org/about-aanp/historical-timeline [verified August 2014].[2] Australian College of Nurse Practitioners (ACNP). ACNP history. 2015. Available at: http://acnp.org.au/history [verified August 2014].
[3] Nursing and Midwifery Board. Australian nurse practitoner standards for practice. 0000. Available at: http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/FAQ/Nurse-practitioner-standards-of- practice-FAQ.aspx [verified August 2014].
[4] Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Registered nurse and enrolled nurse data: March 2014. 2014. Available at: http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Codes-Guidelines.aspx [verified August 2014].
[5] Gardner G, Carryer J, Dunn S, Gardner A. Report to Australian Nursing Council Nurse Practitioner Standards Project. Canberra: Australian Nursing Council; 2004.
[6] Commonwealth of Australia. Health Legislation Amendment (Midwives and Nurse Practitioners) Act. Canberra: Comonwealth of Australia. 2010.
[7] Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. Request for tender: Review of the National Competency Standards for the Nurse Practitioner. Melbourne: AHPRA; 2012.
[8] Donald F, Bryant-Lukosius D, Martin-Misener R, Kaasalainen S, Kilpatrick K, Carter N, DiCens A. Clinical nurse specialists and nurse practitioners: title confusion and lack of role clarity. Nurs Leadersh 2010; 23 189–210.
| Clinical nurse specialists and nurse practitioners: title confusion and lack of role clarity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Kilpatrick K, Lavoie-Tremblay M, Ritchie J, Lamothe L, Doran D, Rochefort C. How are acute care nurse practitioners enacting their roles in healthcare teams? A descriptive multiple-case study. Int J Nurs Stud 2012; 49 850–62.
| How are acute care nurse practitioners enacting their roles in healthcare teams? A descriptive multiple-case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22424700PubMed |
[10] Parker R, Forrest L, McCracken J, McRae I, Cox D. What primary health-care services are Australian consumers willing to accept from nurse practitioners? A national survey. Health Expect 2012; 17 733–40.
| What primary health-care services are Australian consumers willing to accept from nurse practitioners? A national survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22784392PubMed |
[11] Massey P, Prelip M, Calimlim B, Quiter E, Glik D. Contextualising an expanded definition of health literacy among adolescents in the health care setting. Health Educ Res 2012; 27 961–74.
| Contextualising an expanded definition of health literacy among adolescents in the health care setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22623619PubMed |
[12] Sorensen K, Van den Brouke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, Brand H. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 2012; 12 80
| Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22276600PubMed |
[13] Baker D. The meaning and the measure of health literacy. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 878–83.
| The meaning and the measure of health literacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16881951PubMed |
[14] Health Issues Centre. Submission on consumers, the health system and health literacy: Taking action to improve safety and quality. Melbourne: Health Issues Centre; 2013.
[15] Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (ACSQHC). Consumers, the health system and health literacy: taking action to improve safety and quality. Consultation paper. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2013.
[16] Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (ACSQHC). Health literacy stocktake. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2012.
[17] Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67 2072–8.
| The evolving concept of health literacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18952344PubMed |
[18] Horey D. Challenges for consumers in health workforce reform. Health Issues 2006; Autumn 29–32.
[19] Brach C, Keller D, Hernandez L, Baur C, Parker R, Dreyer B, Schyve P, Lemerise AJ, Schillinger D. Ten attributes of health literate health care organisations. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2012.
[20] Shields L. A personal essay on the role of the nurse. Contemp Nurse 2013; 43 213–18.
| A personal essay on the role of the nurse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23485224PubMed |
[21] Thomas M, Buckmaster L. Expertise and public policy: a conceptual guide. Canberra: Parliament of Australia; 2013.
[22] Smithson J. Focus groups. In: Alasuutari P, Bickman L, Brannen J, editors. The Sage handbook of social research methods. London: Sage Publications; 2008.
[23] Hsieh H, Shannon S. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15 1277–88.
| Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16204405PubMed |
[24] Sandelowski M, Leeman J. Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res 2012; 22 1404–13.
| Writing usable qualitative health research findings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22745362PubMed |
[25] Paasche-Orlow M, Schillinger D, Greene S, Wagner E. How health care systems can begin to address the challenge of limited literacy. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 884–7.
| How health care systems can begin to address the challenge of limited literacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16881952PubMed |
