Educational and health impact of the Baume Report: ‘A Cutting Edge: Australia’s Surgical Workforce’
David J. Hillis A E , Michael W. Gorton B , Bruce H. BarracloughA Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Spring Street, East Melbourne, Vic. 3002, Australia.
B Russell Kennedy Solicitors, 469 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia. Email: mgorton@rk.com.au
C School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia. Email: bbarra@ozemail.com.au
D Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia. Email: dbeckett@unimelb.edu.au
E Corresponding author. Email: david.hillis@surgeons.org
Australian Health Review 38(5) 487-494 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14062
Submitted: 22 April 2014 Accepted: 18 August 2014 Published: 6 October 2014
Abstract
Objectives The Baume Report (1994) on Australia’s surgical workforce had the potential to impact upon the health and educational sectors. This paper analyses the recommendations of this report and their impact at the time and 15 years later (2009).
Methods A questionnaire-based study was performed with the 18 senior Fellows and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) solicitor who had been instrumental in facilitating responses to the review.
Results The 19 respondents were asked to evaluate 22 areas from the Baume Report. The most highly ranked areas identified as being reasonable in 1994 were: additional funding being made available for more training positions, identifying workforce deficits, moving towards compulsory continuing professional development and having evidence of competence before introducing new technology. In 2009, the most highly ranked areas were: funding for more training positions; compulsory continuing professional development, involving the profession in improvements and broadening the training environment beyond public hospitals. Areas considered to be substantially addressed were: the selection process and encouragement of diversity, workforce numbers and deficits, confirming the educational merit of the training program and the role of professional colleges.
Conclusions The Baume Report highlighted many issues including workforce planning, the role of professional organisations in society and the complex interface between health and education. Issues of ongoing standards through a surgical career, access for patients to surgical services, funding for more training posts to provide the appropriate workforce level and distribution, and the assessment and introduction of technology remain priorities. Time has not diminished the relevance of these issues.
What is known about this topic? The impact of key government reviews can always be substantial. The Baume Report was directed to postgraduate specialist medical training, particularly surgical training. There have been substantial changes in the health and educational sectors since the report, with significantly more regulation and transparency.
What does this paper add? Analysis of the Baume Report after 15 years by the senior office bearers of the RACS who were actively involved in handling and implementing many of the recommendations provides an insight into the dynamics of specialist training. It outlines the significant changes that have occurred and the things that still need to be done.
What are the implications for practitioners? Professional bodies have an influential presence across society. They are particularly focused on the standards required to become a practitioner of that profession and the ongoing maintenance of these standards. However, this comes with responsibility for and accountability to society and the community. External reviews, particularly with a political imperative, change both the dynamics and key relationships, issues that the professional bodies must commit to addressing in a positive manner.
Additional keywords: accreditation, education, medical colleges, surgeons, workforce planning.
References
[1] Sax S. A strife of interests: politics and policies in Australian health services. Sydney: Allen and Unwin; 1984.[2] Glasson W, Bain R. Medical workforce issues in Australia: “tomorrow’s doctors – too few, too far”. Med J Aust 2003; 179 556
| 14609424PubMed |
[3] Grant JR. Changing postgraduate medical education: a commentary from the United Kingdom. Med J Aust 2007; 186 S9–13.
| 17407425PubMed |
[4] Tooke J. Aspiring to excellence. Findings and recommendations of the independent inquiry into modernising medical careers. London: Medical Schools Council; 2007.
[5] Productivity Commission. Australia’s health workforce. Productivity Commission research report. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2005.
[6] Karmel P. Expansion of medical education. Report of the Committee on Medical Schools to the Australian Universities Commission. Canberra: Australian Government Printer; 1971.
[7] Doherty RL. Australian medical education and workforce into the 21st century: report of the Committee of Inquiry into Medical Education and Medical Workforce. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1988.
[8] Jamieson JH. Efficiency and administration of hospitals. Royal Commission of Inquiry. Parliamentary paper no. 20/1981. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1981.
[9] Health Workforce Australia. Health workforce 2025, volume 3: medical specialties. Adelaide: Health Workforce Australia; 2012.
[10] Baume P. A Cutting Edge: Australia’s Surgical Workforce. Canberra: Australian Department of Human Services and Health; 1994.
[11] Roberfroid D, Leonard C, Stordeur S. Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? Hum Resour Health 2009; 7 10
| Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19216772PubMed |
[12] Sheldon GF, Ricketts TC, Charles A, King J, Fraher EP, Meyer A. The global health workforce shortage: role of surgeons and other providers. Adv Surg 2008; 42 63–85.
| The global health workforce shortage: role of surgeons and other providers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18953810PubMed |
[13] Smith SD. The global workforce shortages and the migration of medical professions: the Australian policy response. Aust New Zealand Health Policy 2008; 5 7
| The global workforce shortages and the migration of medical professions: the Australian policy response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18507867PubMed |
[14] Raymont A, Simpson J. Projections of surgical need in New Zealand: estimates of the need for surgery and surgeons to 2026. N Z Med J 2008; 121 11–8.
| 18551149PubMed |
[15] Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Constitution of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Melbourne: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons; 2010.
[16] Hugh TB, Tracy GD. The blunt edge of the Baume Report. Med J Aust 1995; 162 269–71.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7pvVKjsg%3D%3D&md5=a274e3b07918546692e63a4b5e713159CAS | 7891608PubMed |
[17] Chapman S. Australian surgeons savaged by cutting report. BMJ 1994; 309 1254
| Australian surgeons savaged by cutting report.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7psFCgtg%3D%3D&md5=d3ee559a374c73b57ea5e276626d4863CAS | 7888843PubMed |
[18] 18 Australian Government. Trade Practices Act 1974. Canberra: Australian Government; 1974. Available at: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2010C00623 [verified 29 August 2014].
[19] Leavitt B, March JG. Organizational learning. In: Cohen MD, Sproull LS, editors. Organizational learning. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995. pp. 517–40.
[20] Hillis DJ. Managing the complexity of change in postgraduate surgical education and training. ANZ J Surg 2009; 79 208–13.
| Managing the complexity of change in postgraduate surgical education and training.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19317791PubMed |
[21] Medical Training Review Panel (MTRP). Trainee selection in Australian medical colleges. Canberra: MTRP, Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services; 1998.
[22] Australian Medical Council (AMC). Standards for assessment and accreditation of specialist medical education programs and professional development programs by the Australian Medical Council 2010. Kingston: AMC; 2010.
[23] Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). Royal Australasian College of Surgeons authorisation A90765. Canberra: ACCC; 2003.
[24] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). National definitions for elective surgery urgency categories. Proposal for the Standing Council on Health. Canberra: AIHW; 2013.
