Investing in acute health services: is it time to change the paradigm?
Rhonda Kerr A C , Delia V Hendrie A and Rachael Moorin A BA Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia. Email: D.V.Hendrie@curtin.edu.au; R.Moorin@curtin.edu.au
B School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: kerr005@bigpond.com
Australian Health Review 38(5) 533-540 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13226
Submitted: 28 November 2013 Accepted: 8 May 2014 Published: 28 August 2014
Abstract
Objective Capital is an essential enabler of contemporary public hospital services funding hospital buildings, medical equipment, information technology and communications. Capital investment is best understood within the context of the services it is designed and funded to facilitate. The aim of the present study was to explore the information on capital investment in Australian public hospitals and the relationship between investment and acute care service delivery in the context of efficient pricing for hospital services.
Methods This paper examines the investment in Australian public hospitals relative to the growth in recurrent hospital costs since 2000–01 drawing from the available data, the grey literature and the reports of six major reviews of hospital services in Australia since 2004.
Results Although the average annual capital investment over the decade from 2000–01 represents 7.1% of recurrent expenditure on hospitals, the most recent estimate of the cost of capital consumed delivering services is 9% per annum. Five of six major inquiries into health care delivery required increased capital funding to bring clinical service delivery to an acceptable standard. The sixth inquiry lamented the quality of information on capital for public hospitals. In 2012–13, capital investment was equivalent to 6.2% of recurrent expenditure, 31% lower than the cost of capital consumed in that year.
Conclusions Capital is a vital enabler of hospital service delivery and innovation, but there is a poor alignment between the available information on the capital investment in public hospitals and contemporary clinical requirements. The policy to have capital included in activity-based payments for hospital services necessitates an accurate value for capital at the diagnosis-related group (DRG) level relevant to contemporary clinical care, rather than the replacement value of the asset stock.
What is known about the topic? Deeble’s comprehensive hospital-based review of capital investment and costs, published in 2002, found that investment averages of between 7.1% and 7.9% of recurrent costs primarily replaced existing assets. In 2009, the Productivity Commission and the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHHRC) recommended capital, for the replacement of buildings and medical equipment, be included in activity-based funding. However, there have been persistent concerns about the reliability and quality of the information on the value of hospital capital assets.
What does this paper add? This is the first paper for over a decade to look at hospital capital costs and investment in terms of the services they support. Although health services seek to reap dividends from technology in health care, this study demonstrates that investment relative to services costs has been below sustainable levels for most of the past 10 years. The study questions the helpfulness of the highly aggregated information on capital for public hospital managers striving to improve on the efficient price for services.
What are the implications for practitioners? Using specific and accurate information on capital allocations at the DRG level assists health services managers advance their production functions for the efficient delivery of services.
References
[1] Sullivan L. The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered. Lippincotts Magazine. 1896; The April Number: 403–9.[2] Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision (SCRCSSP). Report on Government Services. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2013. p. Appendix 10.
[3] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Health expenditure Australia 2010–11. Canberra: AIHW; 2012. pp. 79–80.
[4] Young DW, Pearlman LK. Management Accounting In Hospitals: Lessons from Manufacturing. In: Cases M, Wiley MM, editors. Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe Uses and Perspectives. Berlin: Springer- Verlag; 1993. pp. 113–29.
[5] Vogl M. Hospital financing: Calculating inpatient capital costs in Germany with a comparative view on operating costs and the English costing scheme. Health Policy 2014; 115 141–51.
| Hospital financing: Calculating inpatient capital costs in Germany with a comparative view on operating costs and the English costing scheme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24508182PubMed |
[6] Duckett S. Hospital and departmental management in the era of accountability: addressing the new management changes. Aust Health Rev 1994; 17 116–31. [Paper presented at the Best Practice in the Health Sector Conference (1994)]
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7jsVWnsQ%3D%3D&md5=a7dc7e8ac31353a813c7b08d4379038bCAS | 10139616PubMed |
[7] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Health Expenditure Australia 2010–11. Canberra: Health and Welfare Expenditure Series no. 47. 2012. Table 4.25, p. 78.
[8] Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision (SCRCSSP). Report on Government Services. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 1999. p. 192.
[9] Productivity Commission. Public and Private Hospitals: Productivity Commission Research Report, Melbourne: Productivity Commission; 2009.
[10] National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHHRC). A Healthier Future for All Australians-Final Report of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. Canberra: NHHRC; 2009. p. 168.
[11] Reid M. A healthy future for Western Australians. Report of the Health Reform Committee. Perth: Health Department of WA; 2004.
[12] Forster P. Queensland Health Systems Review Final Report. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2005. pp. 269–89.
[13] Garling P. Final Report of the Special Commission of Inquiry. Acute Care Services in NSW Public Hospitals. Sydney: NSW Government; 2008.
[14] Deeble J. Capital Investment in Public Hospitals. Aust Health Rev 2002; 25 45–60.
| Capital Investment in Public Hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12474501PubMed |
[15] Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision (SCRCSSP). Report on Government Services. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2001. p. 197.
[16] Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision (SCRCSSP). Report on Government Services. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 1998. p. 199.
[17] Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision (SCRCSSP). Report on Government Services. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 1997. p. 185.
[18] National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHHRC). A Healthier Future for All Australians Interim Report December 2008. Canberra: NHHRC; 2008. pp. 313–5.
[19] Stokes B. Four Hour Rule Program Progress and Issues Review. East Perth: Health Department of WA; 2011.
[20] Swan W. Budget Speech 2012–13. Canberra: Australian Government Treasury; 2012.
[21] Wells K. 2012-13 State Capital Program. Melbourne: Treasury; 2012–13.
[22] Baird M. Infastructure Statement 2012–13 Budget Paper No. 4. Sydney: NSW Government Treasury; 2012. pp. 3–22.
[23] Baird M. Appropriation Bills 2012–13. Sydney: NSW Government Treasury; 2012. p. 9.
[24] Nicolls T. Queensland Government State Budget 2012–13 Capital Statement Budget Paper No3. Brisbane: Queensland Treasury; 2012. pp. 14–5, 61ff.
[25] Snelling J. 2012–13 Budget Paper No 5 Capital Investment Statement Strong Foundations Stronger Future. Adelaide: SA Government Department of Treasury and Finance; 2012. pp. 27–31.
[26] Porter C. 2012–13 Budget Budget Statements. Perth: WA Treasury Government of Western Australia; 2012. p. 125ff
[27] Giddings L. Budget Paper No 1 – The Budget. Hobart: Government of Tasmania; 2012.
[28] Lawrie D. Budget Paper No 4. The Infrastructure Program. Northern Territory Department of Treasury and Finance. Darwin: Northern Territory Government; 2012.
[29] Barr A. Budget Paper No 4. 2012. pp. 58, 73–5.
[30] Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP). Report on Government Services. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2010.
[31] Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP). Report on Government Services. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2011.
[32] Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP). Report on Government Services. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2012.
[33] Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP). Report on Government Services. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2000.
[34] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Health Expenditure 2009–10. Canberra: AIHW; 2011.
[35] Council of Australian Governments (COAG). National Health Reform Agreement. Canberra: COAG 2011.
[36] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). AIHW Health Expenditure Australia 2010–11. Canberra: AIHW; 2012. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10737423003 [verified 11 June 2013].
[37] Paslawsky L. Paradigm Shift. In Copeland K, editor. Australian Healthcare Design 2000–2015. Stockholm: International Academy for Design and Health; 2013. pp. 20–5.
