Multifetal pregnancies: preterm admissions and outcomes
Tim Badgery-Parker A B , Antonia W. Shand A , Jane B. Ford A , Mary G. Jenkins A , Jonathan M. Morris A C and Christine L. Roberts A C DA Clinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Building 52, University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.
B Centre for Epidemiology and Research, NSW Department of Health, 73 Miller Street North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia.
C Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, University of Sydney, University of Sydney, Building 52, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia. Email: tbadg@doh.health.nsw.gov.au, antonia.shand@sydney.edu.au, jane.ford@sydney.edu.au, mary.jenkins@sydney.edu.au, jonathan.morris@sydney.edu.au
D Corresponding author. Email: clroberts@med.usyd.edu.au
Australian Health Review 36(4) 437-442 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11106
Submitted: 1 November 2011 Accepted: 19 April 2012 Published: 10 September 2012
Abstract
Objective. To describe the rates of antenatal hospital admission during twin or higher order multifetal pregnancies, and the admission outcomes as discharge undelivered, transfer to higher care, or spontaneous or elective delivery.
Methods. Cohort study using linked birth and hospital data. The cohort comprised women who gave birth to twins or higher order multiple infants of ≥ 24 weeks gestation in 2001–2008 and who were admitted to hospital in weeks 20–36 of the pregnancy.
Results. In 63.4% of 10 779 twin pregnancies and 99.5% of 197 triplet and quadruplet pregnancies, the woman was admitted to hospital at least once in weeks 20–36 of the pregnancy, for a total 10 985 admissions. Almost half the admissions (46.3%) ended in discharge without delivery, 10.7% in transfer to higher care, 21.1% in spontaneous labour and birth, and 21.8% in elective delivery (induction or prelabour Caesarean section). The reason for admission was preterm labour in 34.2% of admissions.
Conclusions. Hospital admission during pregnancy is common for women with multifetal pregnancies, with many of these admissions resulting in preterm birth. This is the first study to report the rate of pregnancy admissions for women with multifetal pregnancies, and provides a baseline for future studies of hospital use in this population.
What is known about the topic? Multifetal pregnancies are high risk and require greater medical care than singleton pregnancies. However, few studies specifically examine multifetal pregnancies, and most pregnancy studies exclude them, so there is little known about the resource use of this group.
What does this paper add? This is the first paper to report population rates of hospital admission during pregnancy for women with multifetal pregnancies. We report the admission rates, and the admission outcomes as discharge undelivered, transfer to higher care or spontaneous or elective delivery.
What are the implications for practitioners? Most women with multifetal pregnancies are admitted to hospital at least once during the pregnancy, with 51% of these admissions resulting in preterm delivery. Of those discharged undelivered, 60% were admitted for 1 day or less. This has implications for resource use, proposed place of birth and for practitioners advising pregnant women.
References
[1] Laws PJ, Li Z, Sullivan EA. Australia’s mothers and babies 2008. Canberra: AIHW2010. Report No.: cat. no. PER 50.[2] AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit. Australia’s mothers and babies reports 1991–2008. Available at http://www.npsu.unsw.edu.au/PRERUWeb.nsf/page/Perinatal+Statistics [verified 31 July 2012].
[3] Roberts CL, Algert CS, Morris JM, Henderson-Smart D. Trends in the management of twin births 1990–1999. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 78 213–9.
| Trends in the management of twin births 1990–1999.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nis1eqtQ%3D%3D&md5=4de122bbebdf7fbcc488edf5244462acCAS | 12384266PubMed |
[4] Australian Bureau of Statistics 2010. Births Australia 2009. Canberra: ABS2010. Report No.: cat. no. 3301.0.
[5] Wang YA, Macaldowie A, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Sullivan EA. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2009. Canberra: AIHA2011.
[6] Roberts CL, Raynes-Greenow CH, Algert CS, Peat B. Higher order multiple pregnancies in New South Wales 1990–1999. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42 57–60.
| Higher order multiple pregnancies in New South Wales 1990–1999.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Algert CS, Morris JM, Bowen JR, Giles W, Roberts CL. Twin deliveries and place of birth in NSW 2001–2005. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49 461–6.
| Twin deliveries and place of birth in NSW 2001–2005.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19780726PubMed |
[8] Joseph KS, Liu S, Rouleau J, Kirby RS, Kramer MS, Sauve R, et al Severe maternal morbidity in Canada, 2003 to 2007: surveillance using routine hospitalization data and ICD-10CA codes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32 837–46.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cbkvFGnug%3D%3D&md5=2ea6cd0427a3682d338ab6fd4734080dCAS | 21050516PubMed |
[9] Badgery-Parker T, Ford JB, Jenkins MG, Morris JM, Roberts CL. Patterns and outcomes of preterm hospital admissions during pregnancy in NSW, 2001–2008. Med J Aust 2012; 196 261–5.
| Patterns and outcomes of preterm hospital admissions during pregnancy in NSW, 2001–2008.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22409693PubMed |
[10] Centre for Health Record Linkage. CHeReL Quality Assurance Procedures for Record Linkage. Available at http://www.cherel.org.au/quality-assurance [verified 31 July 2012].
[11] Lain SJ, Hadfield RM, Raynes-Greenow CH, Ford JB, Mealing NM, Algert CS, Roberts CL. Quality of data in perinatal population health databases: a systematic review. Med Care 2011; 50 e7–e20.
| Quality of data in perinatal population health databases: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Roberts CL, Bell JC, Ford JB, Morris JM. Monitoring the quality of maternity care: how well are labour and delivery events reported in population health data? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009; 23 144–52.
| Monitoring the quality of maternity care: how well are labour and delivery events reported in population health data?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19159400PubMed |
[13] Taylor L, Travis S, Pym M, Olive E, Henderson-Smart DJ. How useful are hospital morbidity data for monitoring conditions occurring in the perinatal period? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45 36–41.
| How useful are hospital morbidity data for monitoring conditions occurring in the perinatal period?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15730363PubMed |
[14] Taylor LK, Pym M, Bajuk B, Sutton L, Travis S, Banks C. Validation study: NSW Midwives Data Collection 1998: NSW Department of Health 2000 Contract No.: (EPI) 000029.
[15] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Census of population and housing: socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA), Australia — Data only; 2006. Canberra: ABS. Report No.: cat. no. 2033.0.55.001.
[16] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2010. Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC), July 2010. Canberra: ABS2010. Report No.: cat. no. 1216.0.
[17] Falster MO, Roberts CL, Ford JB, Morris JM, Kinnear A, Nicholl M. Development of a maternity hospital classification for perinatal research. N S W Public Health Bull 2012; 23 12–6.
| Development of a maternity hospital classification for perinatal research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22487327PubMed |
[18] Crowther CA, Han S. Hospitalisation and bed rest for multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; CD000110
| 20614420PubMed |
[19] Combs CA, Garite T, Maurel K, Das A, Porto M. 17-Hydroxyprogresterone caproate for twin pregnancy: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 114 1460–76.
[20] Jorgensen AL, Alfirevic Z, Tudur Smith C, Williamson PR. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss: individual patient data meta-analysis. BJOG 2007; 114 1460–76.
| Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss: individual patient data meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2snmvFOgtw%3D%3D&md5=39fd90ba01c59a58ae1e47a478ad28b8CAS | 17903224PubMed |
[21] Hartley RS, Hitti J. Increasing rates of preterm twin births coincide with improving twin pair survival. J Perinat Med 2010; 38 297–303.
| Increasing rates of preterm twin births coincide with improving twin pair survival.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20121530PubMed |
[22] Kogan MD, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, MacDorman MF, Buekens P, Papiernik E. A comparison of risk factors for twin preterm birth in the United States between 1981–82 and 1996–97. Matern Child Health J 2002; 6 29–35.
| A comparison of risk factors for twin preterm birth in the United States between 1981–82 and 1996–97.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11926251PubMed |
[23] Dowswell T, Middleton P, Weeks A. Antenatal day care units versus hospital admission for women with complicated pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; Art. No.: CD001803
| Antenatal day care units versus hospital admission for women with complicated pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Statewide Services Development Branch. Guide to role delineation for health services. 3rd ed. Sydney: NSW Health; 2002.
[25] Roberts CL, Algert CS. Antenatal transfer of rural women: how does the NSW Inpatient Statistics Collection compare with an audit of hospital records? Aust Health Rev 2000; 23 78–82.
| Antenatal transfer of rural women: how does the NSW Inpatient Statistics Collection compare with an audit of hospital records?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FmtlCjsQ%3D%3D&md5=be1b9bfba589c179f0debbd2b01a786aCAS |
[26] Bacak SJ, Callaghan WM, Dietz PM, Crouse C. Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States, 1999–2000. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192 592–7.
| Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States, 1999–2000.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15696008PubMed |
[27] Gazmararian JA, Petersen R, Jamieson DJ, Schild L, Adams MM, Deshpande AD, et al Hospitalizations during pregnancy among managed care enrollees. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100 94–100.
| Hospitalizations during pregnancy among managed care enrollees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12100809PubMed |
[28] Liu S, Heaman M, Sauve R, Liston R, Reyes F, Bartholomew S, et al An analysis of antenatal hospitalization in Canada, 1991–2003. Matern Child Health J 2007; 11 181–7.
| An analysis of antenatal hospitalization in Canada, 1991–2003.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17089198PubMed |
