Economics and resourcing of complex healthcare systems
Abdolvahab Baghbanian A B C E and Ghazal Torkfar DA Health Promotion Research Centre and Faculty of Health, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Mashahir Square, Zahedan, 98169-13396, Iran.
B Faculty of Health Sciences, Cumberland Campus, University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.
C Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Victor Coppleson Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
D School of Public Health and Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email: gtor2515@uni.sydney.edu.au
E Corresponding author. Email: abag2253@uni.sydney.edu.au
Australian Health Review 36(4) 394-400 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11041
Submitted: 4 May 2011 Accepted: 23 February 2012 Published: 10 September 2012
Abstract
With rapid increases in healthcare spending over recent years, health economic evaluation might be thought to be increasing in importance to decision-makers. Such evaluations are designed to inform the efficient management of healthcare resources. However, research into health policy decisions often report, at best, moderate use of economic evaluation information, especially at the local level of administration. Little attention seems to have been given to the question of why economic evaluations have been underused and why they may yield different results in different contexts. There are many barriers to applying economic evaluations in situations which combine complexity with uncertainty. These barriers call for innovative and creative responses to economic evaluation of healthcare interventions. One response is to view economic evaluations in the context of complex adaptive systems theory. Such theory offers a conceptual framework that takes into account contextual factors, multiple input and output, multiple perspectives and uncertainty involved in healthcare interventions. This article illustrates how complexity theory can enrich and broaden policy-makers’ understanding of why economic evaluations have not always been as successful as health economists would have hoped. It argues for health economists to emphasise contextual knowledge and relativist understanding of decision contexts rather than seeking more technically sound evidence-based reviews including economic evaluations.
What is known about the topic? Although it is widely acknowledged that economic evaluation, as presently constituted, is underused in its influence on allocation decisions in healthcare, previous research often ignores the ways multiple factors influence economic evaluations at several inter-related levels of the healthcare systems. Our topic is novel in its application of complexity theory to economic evaluation and attempts to show how allocation decisions reflect concern for economic efficiency in complex situations.
What does this paper add? This paper shows that, although there has been a dense body of literature on the theoretical use of economic evaluations in allocation decisions around the world, evidence of successful uptake is limited. The paper shows that current economic evaluation practices oversimplify complex allocation decisions. They often ignore, marginalise or devalue the context and modifying conceptual factors that underlie explanation, meaning, sense making and values of real world contingencies. They insufficiently take notice of contextual factors and relationships in multi-objective, multi-stakeholder resource management situations. One approach is to view economic evaluations through the lens of complex adaptive systems theory, which rarely has been informed by current research. This study is innovative in its approach to using complex adaptive systems theory to investigate economic evaluation in a complex environment. The paper describes a vital step for greater acceptance of economic evaluation through understanding the underlying features of complex adaptive systems theory. It supports a shift away from equilibrium and reductionist thinking into the complex behaviour of natural and social systems. It argues for health economists to emphasise contextual knowledge and relativist understanding of the decision contexts, rather than seeking more and more ‘technically sound’ economic evaluations.
What are the implications for practitioners? This study should be of interest to a broad readership, including those interested in health economics, public health policy, healthcare delivery, healthcare resource allocation and decision-making. The paper creates a dialogue about how researchers can better respond to the needs of those making resource allocation decisions in healthcare.
References
[1] Hanney SR, Gonzalez Block MA. Building health research systems to achieve better health. Health Res Policy Syst 2006; 4 10| Building health research systems to achieve better health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17087830PubMed |
[2] Innvaer S. The use of evidence in public governmental reports on health policy: an analysis of 17 Norwegian official reports (NOU). BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9 177
| The use of evidence in public governmental reports on health policy: an analysis of 17 Norwegian official reports (NOU).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19785760PubMed |
[3] Baghbanian A, Hughes I, Khavarpour F. Resource allocation and economic evaluation in Australia’s healthcare system. Aust Health Rev 2011; 35 278–83.
| Resource allocation and economic evaluation in Australia’s healthcare system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21871187PubMed |
[4] van Velden ME, Severens JL, Novak A. Economic evaluations of healthcare programmes and decision making: the influence of economic evaluations on different healthcare decision-making levels. Pharmacoeconomics 2005; 23 1075–82.
| Economic evaluations of healthcare programmes and decision making: the influence of economic evaluations on different healthcare decision-making levels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16277545PubMed |
[5] Walkom E, Robertson J, Newby D, Pillay T. The role of pharmacoeconomics in formulary decision-making: considerations for hospital and managed care pharmacy and therapeutics committees. Formulary 2006; 41 374–86.
[6] Williams IP, Bryan S. Understanding the limited impact of economic evaluation in health care resource allocation: a conceptual framework. Health Policy 2007; 80 135–43.
| Understanding the limited impact of economic evaluation in health care resource allocation: a conceptual framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Lessard C. Complexity and reflexivity: two important issues for economic evaluation in health care. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64 1754–65.
| Complexity and reflexivity: two important issues for economic evaluation in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17258367PubMed |
[8] Eddama O, Coast J. A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making. Health Policy 2008; 86 129–41.
| A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18192059PubMed |
[9] Baghbanian A, Hughes I, Khavarpour F. Adaptive decision-making: how Australian healthcare managers decide. Aust Health Rev 2012; 36 49–56.
| Adaptive decision-making: how Australian healthcare managers decide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22513020PubMed |
[10] Small N, Mannion R. A hermeneutic science: health economics and habermas. J Health Organ Manag 2005; 19 219–35.
| A hermeneutic science: health economics and habermas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16119045PubMed |
[11] Richardson J, McKie J. Empiricism, ethics and orthodox economic theory: what is the appropriate basis for decision-making in the health sector. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60 265–75.
| Empiricism, ethics and orthodox economic theory: what is the appropriate basis for decision-making in the health sector.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15522484PubMed |
[12] Mannion R, Small N. Postmodern health economics. Health Care Anal 1999; 7 255–72.
| Postmodern health economics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FgtFOgsg%3D%3D&md5=cd00c2b0942889b63335774ddb20b028CAS | 10724554PubMed |
[13] Drummond MF. Evaluation of health technology: economic issues for health policy and policy issues for economic appraisal. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38 1593–600.
| Evaluation of health technology: economic issues for health policy and policy issues for economic appraisal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2czitlOqsA%3D%3D&md5=0aa3ee955b7a2e5f9ccdf379d8c59253CAS |
[14] Snowden DJ, Boone ME. A leader’s framework for decision making. Harv Bus Rev 2007; 85 68–76.
| 18159787PubMed |
[15] Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 2008; 336 1281–3.
| Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Munday DF, Johnson SA, Griffiths FE. Complexity theory and palliative care. Palliat Med 2003; 17 308–9.
| Complexity theory and palliative care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3psFalsg%3D%3D&md5=75b7805747ccaae45cf6f099722f70b7CAS | 12822845PubMed |
[17] Kernick D. The demise of linearity in managing health services: a call for post normal health care. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002; 7 121–4.
| The demise of linearity in managing health services: a call for post normal health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11934378PubMed |
[18] Plsek PE. Redesigning health care with insights from the science of complex adaptive systems. In: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, editor. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.
[19] Sweeney KG, Mannion R. Complexity and clinical governance: using the insights to develop the strategy. Br J Gen Pract 2002; 52 S4–9.
| 12389762PubMed |
[20] Wilson T, Holt T, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: complexity and clinical care. BMJ 2001; 323 685–8.
| Complexity science: complexity and clinical care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrhvFChtw%3D%3D&md5=330a13efbc817661e3a81fb4cf92626fCAS | 11566836PubMed |
[21] Zimmerman B, Lindberg C, Plsek PE. Edgeware: insights from complexity science for health care leaders. Irving, Texas: VHA Inc.; 2001.
[22] Albrecht G, Freeman S, Higginbotham N. Complexity and human health: the case for a transdisciplinary paradigm. Cult Med Psychiatry 1998; 22 55–92.
| Complexity and human health: the case for a transdisciplinary paradigm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1czitFakug%3D%3D&md5=0591daaee143f697ab8d1d12d62469c1CAS | 9657059PubMed |
[23] Brown C. The application of complex adaptive systems theory to clinical practice in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28 587–93.
| The application of complex adaptive systems theory to clinical practice in rehabilitation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16690588PubMed |
[24] Benson H. Chaos and complexity: applications for healthcare quality and patient safety. J Healthc Qual 2005; 27 4–10.
| Chaos and complexity: applications for healthcare quality and patient safety.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17514844PubMed |
[25] Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: the challenge of complexity in health care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 2001; 323 625–8.
| Complexity science: the challenge of complexity in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrgvFOkuw%3D%3D&md5=40a5bb10dae81ae59db3591a013d79acCAS |
[26] Kurtz CF, Snowden DJ. The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Syst J 2003; 42 462–83.
| The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Stacey RD. Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.; 1996.
[28] Cilliers P. Complexity and postmodernism: understanding complex systems. London: Routledge; 1998.
[29] Wheatley MJ. Leadership and the new science: discovering order in a chaotic world. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006.
[30] Begun JW, Zimmerman B, Dooley K. Health care organizations as complex adaptive systems. In: Mick SS, Wyttenbach ME, editors. Advances in health care organization theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
[31] Holden LM. Complex adaptive systems: concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2005; 52 651–7.
| Complex adaptive systems: concept analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16313378PubMed |
[32] Bar-Yam Y. Improving the effectiveness of health care and public health: a multiscale complex systems analysis. Am J Public Health 2006; 96 459–66.
| Improving the effectiveness of health care and public health: a multiscale complex systems analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16449583PubMed |
[33] Byford S, Sefton T. Economic evaluation of complex health and social care interventions. Natl Inst Econ Rev 2003; 186 98–108.
[34] Kernick D. Health economics and insights from complexity theory. In: Kernick D, editor. Getting health economics into practice. Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd; 2002.
[35] Ormerod P. Butterfly economics. New York: Panthion Books; 2000.
[36] Gatrell AC. Complexity theory and geographies of health: a critical assessment. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60 2661–71.
| Complexity theory and geographies of health: a critical assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15820578PubMed |
[37] Durlauf SN. What should policymakers know about economic complexity? Wash Q 1997; 21 155–165.
[38] Kernick D. Wanted – new methodologies for health service research. Is complexity theory the answer? Fam Pract 2006; 23 385–90.
| Wanted – new methodologies for health service research. Is complexity theory the answer?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16597669PubMed |
[39] Ramadier T. Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies. Futures 2004; 36 423–39.
| Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[40] Baghbanian A. The emergence of adaptive decision-making in complex health systems: economics and resourcing of complex health systems: the emergence of adaptive decision-making in health care. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing; 2011.
[41] Baghbanian A, Torkfar G, Baghbanian Y. Decision-making in Australia’s healthcare system and insights from complex adaptive systems theory. Health Scope 2012; 1 29–38.
| Decision-making in Australia’s healthcare system and insights from complex adaptive systems theory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
