Indigenous participation in an informal national Indigenous health policy network
Mark J. Lock A E , David P. Thomas A B , Ian P. Anderson C and Philippa Pattison DA Centre for Health and Society, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia.
B Menzies School of Health Research and Lowitja Institute, Charles Darwin University, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0811, Australia. Email: david.thomas@menzies.edu.au
C Onemda VicHealth Koori Health Unit, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia. Email: i.anderson@unimelb.edu.au
D School of Behavioural Science, The University of Melbourne, 12th Floor, Redmond Barry Building, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. Email: pepatt@unimelb.edu.au
E Corresponding author. Email: mlock@unimelb.edu.au
Australian Health Review 35(3) 309-315 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH09812
Submitted: 20 July 2009 Accepted: 19 October 2010 Published: 25 August 2011
Abstract
Objective. To determine and describe the features of Indigenous participation in an informal national Indigenous health policy network.
Design. A questionnaire was administered during 2003–04. Through a snowball nomination process a total of 227 influential persons were identified. Of these, 173 received surveys of which 44 were returned, a return rate of 25%.
Outcome measures. These data were analysed to detect the existence of network groups; measure the degree of group interconnectivity; and measure the characteristics of bonds between influential persons. Demographic information was used to characterise the network and its groups.
Results. Indigenous people were integral to the network due to their high representation, their distribution throughout the 16 groups, and the interconnections between the groups. The network was demographically diverse and multiple relational variables were needed to characterise it. Indigenous and non-Indigenous people had strong ties in this network.
Conclusion. Social network methods made visible an informal network where Indigenous and non-Indigenous people relate in a complex socio-political environment to influence national Indigenous health policy.
What is known about the topic? The participation of Indigenous people is acknowledged as important in health, but there is criticism of the lack of real opportunities for Indigenous people to participate in national Indigenous health policy processes.
What does this paper add? This research reveals the presence of an informal network of influential persons. It demonstrates a way to investigate the concept of participation through social network analytic techniques. It reveals that Indigenous people are fundamental to an informal network that influences national health policy processes.
What are the implications for practitioners? Practitioners can become more aware of their place in informal networks of influence and of their capacity to exercise personal influence in national policy decisions based on advice drawn from their informal networks.
References
[1] Anderson I, Saunders W. Aboriginal Health and Institutional Reform within Australian Federalism, in CAEPR Discussion Paper No. 117/1996. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University; 1996.[2] National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health: Framework for Action by Governments . Canberra: National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Council; 2003.
[3] Bell K, Couzos S, Daniels J, Hunter P, Mayers N, Murray R. Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services. In: General Practice in Australia: 2000. Canberra, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care; 2000: 74–103.
[4] Holistic approach needed for Aboriginal health, conference hears. In: The World Today. Transcript Thursday, 19 June 2003, 1218 hours. Available at http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2003/s883610.htm [verified 30 May 2011].
[5] Eckermann A, Dowd T, Martin M, Nixon L, Gray R, Chong E. Binan goonj: Bridging Cultures in Aboriginal Health. Armidale: University of New England Press; 1992.
[6] Pratt A 2003; Make or break? A background to the ATSIC changes and the ATSIC review. Current Issues Brief No. 29, 2002–03. Canberra: Department of the Parliamentary Library, Information and Research Services; 2003.
[7] Weaver S. Australian Aboriginal policy: Aboriginal pressure groups or government advisory bodies? Part 1. Oceania 1983; 54 1–22.
[8] Weaver S. Australian Aboriginal policy: Aboriginal pressure groups or government advisory bodies? Part 2. Oceania 1983; 54 85–108.
[9] Anderson I. Aboriginal Australians, Governments, and Participation in Health Systems, in Health, Social Change and Communities. Gardner H, Liamputtong P, editors. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2003: 224–40.
[10] Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner. Social Justice Report 2004. Canberra: Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission; 2005.
[11] Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner. Social Justice Report 2005. Canberra: Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission; 2006.
[12] Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner. Social Justice Report 2007. Canberra: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission; 2008.
[13] Summers J. The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia and Indigenous Peoples 1901–1967. In: The Vision in Hindsight: Parliament and the Constitution: Paper No. 10. Canberra: Department of the Parliamentary Library; 2000.
[14] Attwood B, Markus A. The Struggle for Aboriginal Rights: A Documentary History. Sydney: Allen & Unwin; 1999.
[15] Lewis JM. Being around and knowing the players: networks of influence in health policy. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62 2125–36.
| Being around and knowing the players: networks of influence in health policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Considine M, Lewis J. Governance at the ground level: the frontline bureaucrat in the age of markets and networks. Public Adm Rev 1999; 59 467–80.
| Governance at the ground level: the frontline bureaucrat in the age of markets and networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Petersen J. Policy Networks. In: Reihe Politikwissenschaft: Political Science Series 90. Vienna, Austria: Institute for Advanced Studies; 2003. Available at http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_90.pdf [verified 30 May 2011].
[18] Borzel T. Organising Babylon – on the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Adm 1998; 76 253–73.
| Organising Babylon – on the different conceptions of policy networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. In: Granovetter M, editor. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
[20] New Arrangements in Indigenous Affairs. Canberra: Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, Office of Indigenous Policy Coordination; 2004.
[21] Hawe P, Webster C, Shiell A. A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58 971–5.
| A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Lewis J, Considine M. Medicine, economics and agenda-setting. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48 393–405.
| Medicine, economics and agenda-setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7nsV2jtg%3D%3D&md5=987e6731d5d2ae610b2a514cd52b6b12CAS |
[23] Lewis JM. A network approach for researching partnerships in health. Aust New Zealand Health Policy 2005; 2 22
| A network approach for researching partnerships in health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Hanneman RA. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: Department of Sociology, University of California; 2001.
[25] National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health: Context. Canberra: National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Council; 2003.
[26] Knoke D, Laumman EO. The Social Organization of National Policy Domains. In: Lin N, Marsden PV, editors. Social Structure and Networks. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1982: 255–70.
[27] Borgatti SP. NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies Inc.; 2002.
[28] Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies Inc.; 2002.
[29] Hancock MS, Gile K. Modeling Social Networks with Sampled or Missing Data, in Working Paper no. 75. Seattle, WA: Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington; 2007.
[30] Wang P, Robins G, Pattison P. PNet: Program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph models. Melbourne: Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne; 2008.
[31] Kossinets G. Effects of missing data in social networks. Soc Networks 2006; 28 247–68.
| Effects of missing data in social networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Keen I, editor. Being Black: Aboriginal Cultures in ‘Settled’ Australia. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press for Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies; 1988.
[33] Attwood B. Introduction. In: Attwood B, Arnold J, editors. Power, Knowledge and Aborigines. Melbourne: La Trobe University Press; 1992: i–xvi.
[34] Anderson I. Aboriginal society and health: critical issues demand what from sociologists? Health Sociol Rev 2001; 10 5–20.
| Aboriginal society and health: critical issues demand what from sociologists?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[35] Anderson I, Crengle S, Kamaka ML, Chen T-H, Palafox N, Jackson-Pulver L. Indigenous health in Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific. Lancet 2006; 367 1775–85.
| Indigenous health in Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[36] Calma T. Media Release – Health: Indigenous health needs to be addressed with a holistic rights-based approach. Canberra: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission; 2006.
[37] Anderson I, Whyte J. Australian federalism and Aboriginal health. Australian Aboriginal Studies 2006; 2 5–16.
[38] Audit Report No.13 – The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Program, Department of Health and Aged Care. Canberra: Australian National Audit Office; 1998.
[39] Humphery K. Dirty questions: Indigenous health and ‘western research’. Aust N Z J Public Health 2001; 25 197–202.
| Dirty questions: Indigenous health and ‘western research’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvkvFaitw%3D%3D&md5=2e57e40a805898bc1d1891c8d7b53b05CAS |
[40] KPMG Consulting. Supplementary Paper 4: Context of Aboriginal Health Policy. In: The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Coordinated Care Trials National Evaluation Report, Volume 2, Supplementary Papers 1–5. Canberra: Office for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care; 2001.
[41] National Health and Medical Research Council. Values and Ethics: Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research; 2003. NHMRC: Canberra.
[42] Religious figure criticises ATSIC scrapping. In: ABC News. Posted Thursday 8 July 2004, 2128 hours AEST. Available at http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2004/07/08/1149833.htm [verified 30 May 2011].
[43] Indigenous leaders lament ATSIC’s demise. In: ABC News. Posted Thursday 17 March 2005, 0649 hours AEDT. Available at http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2005/03/17/1325199.htm [verified 30 May 2011].
[44] ATSIC abolished to silence indigenous voice: Alison Anderson. In: The World Today. Transcript Friday, 16 April 2004, 1228 hours. Available at http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2004/s1088994.htm [verified 30 May 2011].
