Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluating the research capacity and culture of an urban Mental Health and Wellbeing Program

Stanley Innes https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7783-8328 A B * , David Taylor C and Judith Hope A B D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Adult Mental Health and Wellbeing Program, Eastern Health, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Vic 3128, Australia.

B Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Eastern Health, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Vic 3128, Australia.

C Office of Research and Ethics, Eastern Health Institute, Eastern Health, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Vic 3128, Australia.

D Centre for Mental Health Education and Research, Delmont Private Hospital, Eastern Health, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Vic 3128, Australia.


Australian Health Review https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24223
Submitted: 14 August 2024  Accepted: 17 November 2024  Published: 9 December 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA.

Abstract

Objective

Research capacity in health care involves the ability to conduct, access, evaluate, and apply research evidence and results in elevated quality of care. Despite its significance, mental health organisations face challenges in assessing and enhancing their research capacity. This study aimed to evaluate the research capacity and culture within a large metropolitan health service’s Mental Health and Wellbeing Program (MHWP).

Methods

A cross-sectional, observational study using the Research Capacity and Culture (RCC) tool was conducted among approximately 1081 MHWP employees. An online survey recorded staff views on research readiness, interest, motivators, and barriers.

Results

Of 220 survey entries, 100 were completed. The majority were female (n = 68), under 40 years old (n = 51), and employed full-time (n = 54). The highest RCC domain score was for organisational culture. Half of the respondents thought research was not part of their role, yet 70% wanted more involvement. Motivators included skill development, while barriers included a lack of time and funds.

Conclusions

The findings emphasise the need for targeted strategies to enhance research culture at the individual level. However, opportunities also exist at the team and organisational levels. The study provided insights that can guide future interventions and capacity-building initiatives.

Keywords: health workforce, mental health services, motivation, organisational culture, research capacity building, research personnel, workplace culture.

References

Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J, Taylor NF. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev 2016; 41(1): 45-53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jonker L, Fisher SJ, Dagnan D. Patients admitted to more research‐active hospitals have more confidence in staff and are better informed about their condition and medication: Results from a retrospective cross‐sectional study. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26(1): 203-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

McKeon S. Strategic review of health and medical research in Australia. 2013. Available at https://apo.org.au/node/33477

Holden L, Pager S, Golenko X, Ware RS. Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels. Aust J Prim Health 2012; 18(1): 62-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Victorian Health and Medical. Research Strategy: 2022–2032. Spring Street Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2022.

Royal Commission into Victoria’s Mental Health System. Final report. 2021. Available at https://rcvmhs.archive.royalcommission.vic.gov.au/

Gill SD, Gwini SM, Otmar R, Lane SE, Quirk F, Fuscaldo G. Assessing research capacity in Victoria’s south‐west health service providers. Aust J Rural Health 2019; 27(6): 505-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Brandenburg C, Noble C, Wenke R, Hughes I, Barrett A, Wellwood J, et al. Relationship between research culture and research activity of medical doctors: a survey and audit. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021; 14: 2137-50.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Migliorini C, McDowell C, Turville M, Bevilacqua J, Harvey C. Research capacity and culture in an Australian metropolitan public mental health service: scoping the skills and experience of social workers and occupational therapists. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22(1): 864.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

10  Matus J, Wenke R, Hughes I, Mickan S. Evaluation of the research capacity and culture of allied health professionals in a large regional public health service. J Multidiscip Healthc 2019; 12: 83-96.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

11  Lee SA, Byth K, Gifford JA, Balasubramanian M, Fozzard CA, Skapetis T, et al. Assessment of health research capacity in Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD): a study on medical, nursing and allied health professionals. J Multidiscip Healthc 2020; 13: 153-63.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

12  Williams C, Miyazaki K, Borkowski D, McKinstry C, Cotchet M, Haines T. Research capacity and culture of the Victorian public health allied health workforce is influenced by key research support staff and location. Aust Health Rev 2015; 39(3): 303-11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

13  Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42(2): 377-81.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

14  Raschke N, Bradbury J, Yoxall J. Perceptions of research capacity in public health organisations: comparison of NSW metropolitan and non-metropolitan Local Health Districts. Aust Health Rev 2022; 46(6): 746-55.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

15  Pickstone C, Nancarrow S, Cooke J, Vernon W, Mountain G, Boyce RA, et al. Building research capacity in the allied health professions. Evidence Policy 2008; 4(1): 53-68.
| Google Scholar |