Paying for value: options for value-based payment reform in Australia
Sarah Wise
A C , Jane Hall A , Philip Haywood A B , Nikita Khana A , Lutfun Hossain A and Kees van Gool A
A Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia. Email: jane.hall@uts.edu.au; phil.haywood@uts.edu.au; nikita.khana@uts.edu.au; lutfun.hossain@uts.edu.au; kees.vanGool@uts.edu.au
B Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
C Corresponding author. Email: sarah.wise@uts.edu.au
Australian Health Review 46(2) 129-133 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH21115
Submitted: 1 April 2021 Accepted: 26 August 2021 Published: 16 November 2021
Abstract
Value-based health care has gained increasing prominence among funders and providers in efforts to improve the outcomes important to patients relative to the resources used to deliver care. In Australia, the value-based healthcare agenda has focused on reducing the use of ‘low-value’ interventions, redesigning models of care to improve integration between providers and increasing the use of patient-reported measures to drive improvement; all have occurred within existing payment structures. In this paper we describe options for value-based payment reform and highlight two challenges critical for success: attributing financial risk fairly and organisational structures.
What is known about the topic? ‘Fee for service’ is the dominant payment method in Australia and creates incentives to increase service volume, rewarding inputs rather than improvements in longer-term health outcomes. There is increasing recognition that payment reform is needed to support the shift to value-based health care in Australia.
What does this paper add? This paper describes the three main options for value-based payment reform: episode-based bundled payments chronic condition bundled payments and comprehensive capitation payments. Each involves some degree of funds pooling, and the shifting of risk from the funder to provider to stimulate the more efficient use of resources.
What are the implications for practitioners? We conclude that local hospital authorities in the states, private health insurers and primary health networks could implement reform as payment holders, but that capacity development in coordination and risk adjustment will be required. Successful implementation of payment reform will also require investment in data collection and information technology to track patients’ care and measure outcomes and costs.
References
[1] European Commission. Defining Value in “Value-based Healthcare”. Brussels: Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in Health (EXPH); 2019.[2] Woolcock K. Value Based Health Care: Setting the scene for Australia. Canberra: Deeble Institute; 2019.
[3] Porter ME. What Is Value in Health Care? N Engl J Med 2010; 363 2477–81.
| What Is Value in Health Care?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21142528PubMed |
[4] Cattel D, Eijkenaar F. Value-Based Provider Payment Initiatives Combining Global Payments With Explicit Quality Incentives: A Systematic Review. Med Care Res Rev 2020; 77 511–37.
| Value-Based Provider Payment Initiatives Combining Global Payments With Explicit Quality Incentives: A Systematic Review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31216945PubMed |
[5] Scott A, Liu M, Yong J. Financial Incentives to Encourage Value-Based Health Care. Med Care Res Rev 2018; 75 3–32.
| Financial Incentives to Encourage Value-Based Health Care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27815451PubMed |
[6] Cattel D, Eijkenaar F, Schut FT. Value-based provider payment: towards a theoretically preferred design. Health Econ Policy Law 2020; 15 94–112.
| Value-based provider payment: towards a theoretically preferred design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30259825PubMed |
[7] Department of Health. Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Review. 2019. Available at: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/MBSReviewTaskforce [verified 31 March 2021].
[8] NSW Health. Value based healthcare. 2020. Available at: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Value/Pages/default.aspx [verified 31 March 2021].
[9] Productivity Commission. Innovations in Care for Chronic Health Conditions. Productivity Commission: Canberra; 2021.
[10] Williams K, Sansoni J, Morris D, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2016.
[11] OECD. Better Ways to Pay for Health Care. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2016.
[12] Conrad DA. The Theory of Value-Based Payment Incentives and Their Application to Health Care. Health Serv Res 2015; 50 2057–89.
| The Theory of Value-Based Payment Incentives and Their Application to Health Care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26549041PubMed |
[13] Department of Health. 2020–25 National Health Reform Agreement (NHRA). 2021. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/2020-25-national-health-reform-agreement-nhra [verified 16 July 2021].
[14] HCP-LAN. Alternative Payment Model Framework. Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network; 2017. Available at: https://hcp-lan.org/apm-refresh-white-paper/
[15] Stokes J, Struckmann V, Kristensen SR, et al Towards incentivising integration: A typology of payments for integrated care. Health Policy 2018; 122 963–9.
| Towards incentivising integration: A typology of payments for integrated care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30033204PubMed |
[16] Steenhuis S, Struijs J, Koolman X, et al Unraveling the Complexity in the Design and Implementation of Bundled Payments: A Scoping Review of Key Elements From a Payer’s Perspective. Milbank Q 2020; 98 197–222.
| Unraveling the Complexity in the Design and Implementation of Bundled Payments: A Scoping Review of Key Elements From a Payer’s Perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31909852PubMed |
[17] Yee CA, Pizer SD, Frakt A. Medicare’s Bundled Payment Initiatives for Hospital-Initiated Episodes: Evidence and Evolution. Milbank Q 2020; 98 908–74.
| Medicare’s Bundled Payment Initiatives for Hospital-Initiated Episodes: Evidence and Evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32820837PubMed |
[18] Jacobs J, Daniel I, Baker GR, et al. Bundling Care and Payment: Evidence from Early-Adopters. Toronto: Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; 2015.
[19] Struijs JN, de Vries EF, Baan CA, et al. Bundled-Payment Models Around the World: How They Work and What Their Impact Has Been. Washington: The Commonwealth Fund; 2020.
[20] van Dover TJ, Kim DD. Do Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Measures Reflect Cost-Effectiveness Evidence? Value Health 2021;
| Do Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Measures Reflect Cost-Effectiveness Evidence?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 34711358PubMed |
[21] Barnes AJ, Unruh L, Chukmaitov A, et al Accountable care organizations in the USA: Types, developments and challenges. Health Policy 2014; 118 1–7.
| Accountable care organizations in the USA: Types, developments and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25145942PubMed |
[22] Stokes J, Shah V, Goldzahl L, et al Does prevention-focused integration lead to the triple aim? An evaluation of two new care models in England. J Health Serv Res Policy 2021; 26 125–32.
| Does prevention-focused integration lead to the triple aim? An evaluation of two new care models in England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33106038PubMed |
[23] Agarwal R, Liao JM, Gupta A, et al The Impact Of Bundled Payment On Health Care Spending, Utilization, And Quality: A Systematic Review. Health Aff 2020; 39 50–7.
| The Impact Of Bundled Payment On Health Care Spending, Utilization, And Quality: A Systematic Review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Meng Z, Hui W, Cai Y, et al The effects of DRGs-based payment compared with cost-based payment on inpatient healthcare utilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Policy 2020; 124 359–67.
| The effects of DRGs-based payment compared with cost-based payment on inpatient healthcare utilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32001043PubMed |
[25] Karimi M, Tsiachristas A, Looman W, et al Bundled payments for chronic diseases increased health care expenditure in the Netherlands, especially for multimorbid patients. Health Policy 2021; 125 751–9.
| Bundled payments for chronic diseases increased health care expenditure in the Netherlands, especially for multimorbid patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33947604PubMed |
[26] Department of Health. PIP QI Incentive guidance. 2020. Available at: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/PIP-QI_Incentive_guidance [verified 30 September 2020].
[27] Independent Hospital Pricing Authority. Pricing Framework for Australian Public Hospital Services 2021–22. Darlinghurst: Independent Hospital Pricing Authority; 2021.
[28] Jackson T, Dimitropoulos V, Madden R, et al Australian diagnosis related groups: Drivers of complexity adjustment. Health Policy 2015; 119 1433–41.
| Australian diagnosis related groups: Drivers of complexity adjustment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26521013PubMed |
[29] Porter ME, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harv Bus Rev 2013; 91 50–70.
[30] Australian Medical Association. Australian Medical Association’s Vision for Australia’s Health. Canberra: AMA; 2021.
