Safety for women when accessing mental health services: a scoping review of the link between safety and recovery
Karen Dixon
A C , Ellie Fossey A and Melissa Petrakis B
A Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University Peninsula Campus, 47–49 Moorooduc Highway, Frankston, Vic. 3199, Australia. Email: ellie.fossey@monash.edu
B Department of Social Work, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Level 4, Building C, Caulfield Campus, 900 Dandenong Road, Caulfield East, Vic. 3145, Australia. Email: melissa.petrakis@monash.edu
C Corresponding author. Email: karen.dixon1@monash.edu
Australian Health Review 45(5) 554-561 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20275
Submitted: 26 September 2020 Accepted: 4 May 2021 Published: 5 August 2021
Abstract
Objective A sense of safety and recovery from mental health issues seem to be interrelated concepts but, to date, there has been no review of studies exploring the links between safety and recovery for women accessing mental health programs. This review aimed to identify current knowledge and knowledge gaps regarding the experiences of women and their personal safety when accessing mixed-gender and women’s mental health programs.
Methods A scoping review methodology was used. Four electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, AMED, and CINAHL) were searched, covering the period from January 2000 to December 2019, to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles, which were screened for inclusion. Key search terms included (‘women’ or ‘female’ or ‘gender’) and (‘recovery’ and ‘mental health programs’) or (‘community mental health’ or ‘community mental health centres/or community mental health centre’) and ‘safety’.
Results Twelve studies were identified, 10 of which were from English-speaking countries (five from the UK, three from Australia, two from the US) and two from European countries, indicating there is limited literature directly relevant to women with mental health issues and their personal safety while using mental health services. Safety from assault and harassment and finding safe and supportive connections were commonly reported as crucial to the process of recovery for the women with mental health issues across these studies.
Conclusions Based on the identified knowledge gaps, this paper advances the argument for more research to inform gender-specific service provision.
What is known about the topic? Service guidelines identify the need for gender-sensitive practices in mental health services, yet women continue to report experiences of sexual or other forms of harassment while in acute and subacute mental health programs.
What does this paper add? This study identified the current knowledge regarding the experiences of women when accessing mental health programs. In particular, a sense of feeling safe in services was crucial to the process of recovery for women with mental health issues.
What are the implications for practitioners? This study contributes to the body of knowledge informing health professionals who work within these mental health programs and highlights the need to meet women’s needs to feel safe when accessing services.
Keywords: mental health, mental illness, recovery-oriented practice, safety, scoping review, women.
References
[1] McDermott F, Meadows GN. Understanding Mental Health Disorder. In Meadows G, Farhall J, Fossey E, Grigg M, McDermott F, Singh B, editors. Mental Health in Australia: Collaborative Community Practice Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 4–17.[2] Ash D, Bland R, Brown P, Browne MO, Burvill P, Dawes J, et al. Mental health services in the Australian states and territories. In Meadows G, Farhall J, Fossey E, Grigg M, McDermott F, Singh B, editors. Mental health in Australia: Collaborative community practice, 3rd edn. Melbourne: Oxford University Press: 2012: pp. 118–154.
[3] Australian Government. National Mental Health Policy. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1992.
[4] Victorian Government. Mental Health Act 2014 (VIC). In Department of Health & Human Services, editor. Melbourne; 2014.
[5] Le Boutillier C, Leamy M, Bird VJ, Davidson L, Williams J, Slade M. What does recovery mean in practice? A qualitative analysis of international recovery-oriented practice guidance. Psychiatr Serv 2011; 62 1470–6.
| What does recovery mean in practice? A qualitative analysis of international recovery-oriented practice guidance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22193795PubMed |
[6] Andresen R, Oades L, Caputi P. The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: towards an empirically validated stage model. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2003; 37 586–94.
| The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: towards an empirically validated stage model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14511087PubMed |
[7] Mental health Complaints Commission. The right to be safe. Ensuring sexual safety in acute mental health inpatient units: sexual safety project report. In Victorian Government, editor. 2018.
[8] Kulkarni J, Gavrilidis E, Lee S, Van Rheenen TE, Grigg J, Hayes E, et al Establishing female-only areas in psychiatry wards to improve safety and quality of care for women. Australas Psychiatry 2014; 22 551–6.
| Establishing female-only areas in psychiatry wards to improve safety and quality of care for women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25358653PubMed |
[9] Clarke H. Nowhere to be safe: Women’s experiences of mixed-sex psychiatric wards. VWMH Network (ed), Victorian Women and Mental Health Network. 2007; 4: 4.
[10] Kennedy J, Fortune T. Women’s Experiences of Being in an Acute Psychiatric Unit: An Occupational Perspective. Br J Occup Ther 2014; 77 296–303.
| Women’s Experiences of Being in an Acute Psychiatric Unit: An Occupational Perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Department of Health. Service guideline on gender sensitivity and safety: Promoting a holistic approach to wellbeing. Department of Health, editor. Melbourne, Victoria: Victorian Government; 2011.
[12] Watson J, Maylea C, Roberts R, Hill N, McCallum S. Preventing gender-based violence in mental health inpatient units: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety; 2020.
[13] Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18 143
| Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30453902PubMed |
[14] Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8 19–32.
| Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Anthony WA. A recovery-oriented service system: Setting some system level standards. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2000; 24 159–68.
| A recovery-oriented service system: Setting some system level standards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010; 5 69
| Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20854677PubMed |
[17] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151 264–9.
| Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19622511PubMed |
[18] Long CG, Fulton B, Dolley O, Hollin CR. Dealing with feelings: the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural group treatment for women in secure settings. Behav Cogn Psychother 2011; 39 243–7.
| Dealing with feelings: the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural group treatment for women in secure settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21114895PubMed |
[19] Prendergast ML, Messina NP, Hall EA, Warda US. The relative effectiveness of women-only and mixed-gender treatment for substance-abusing women. J Subst Abuse Treat 2011; 40 336–48.
| The relative effectiveness of women-only and mixed-gender treatment for substance-abusing women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21315540PubMed |
[20] Greenfield SF, Cummings AM, Kuper LE, Wigderson SB, Koro-Ljungberg M. A qualitative analysis of women’s experiences in single-gender versus mixed-gender substance abuse group therapy. Subst Use Misuse 2013; 48 750–60.
| A qualitative analysis of women’s experiences in single-gender versus mixed-gender substance abuse group therapy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23607675PubMed |
[21] Meiser-Stedman C, Howard L, Cutting P. Evaluating the effectiveness of a women’s crisis house: a prospective observational study. Psychiatr Bull 2006; 30 324–6.
| Evaluating the effectiveness of a women’s crisis house: a prospective observational study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Howard L, Rigon E, Cole L, Lawlor C, Johnson S. Admission to women’s crisis houses or to psychiatric wards: women’s pathways to admission. Psychiatr Serv 2008; 59 1443–9.
| Admission to women’s crisis houses or to psychiatric wards: women’s pathways to admission.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19033172PubMed |
[23] Taylor T, Dorer G, Bradfield S, Killaspy H. Meeting the needs of women in mental health rehabilitation services. Br J Occup Ther 2010; 73 477–80.
| Meeting the needs of women in mental health rehabilitation services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Schön U. Recovery from severe mental illness, a gender perspective. Scand J Caring Sci 2010; 24 557–64.
| Recovery from severe mental illness, a gender perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20409052PubMed |
[25] Wright KM, Hacking S. An angel on my shoulder: a study of relationships between women with anorexia and healthcare professionals. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2012; 19 107–15.
| An angel on my shoulder: a study of relationships between women with anorexia and healthcare professionals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22074235PubMed |
[26] Shepherd A, Sanders C, Doyle M, Shaw J. Personal recovery in personality disorder: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative methods studies. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2016; 62 41–50.
| Personal recovery in personality disorder: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative methods studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26081467PubMed |
[27] Coffey K. Dual diagnosis: an introduction. In P. Bebbington, editor. New Directions in Treatment, Education, and Outreach for Mental Health and Addiction. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. 3–8 p.
[28] McGarry J. ‘Hiding in plain sight’: exploring the complexity of sexual safety within an acute mental health setting. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2019; 28 171–80.
| ‘Hiding in plain sight’: exploring the complexity of sexual safety within an acute mental health setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29963747PubMed |
[29] Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. A national framework for recovery-oriented mental health services: Policy and theory. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2013.
