Description of the effect of patient flow, junior doctor supervision and pandemic preparation on the ability of emergency physicians to provide direct patient care
Andy Lim A B F , Namankit Gupta B , Alvin Lim C , Wei Hong D and Katie Walker B EA Department of Emergency Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Vic. 3168, Australia.
B School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia. Email: ngup27@student.monash.edu
C Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. Email: a.lim.syuen@gmail.com
D Department of Oncology, St Vincent’s Hospital, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Vic. 3065, Australia. Email: wei.hong@svha.org.au
E Department of Emergency Medicine, Casey Hospital, 62–70 Kangan Drive, Berwick, Vic. 3806, Australia. Email: katie_walker01@yahoo.com.au
F Corresponding author. Email: andy.lim2@monash.edu
Australian Health Review 44(5) 741-747 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20180
Submitted: 18 July 2020 Accepted: 10 August 2020 Published: 31 August 2020
Journal Compilation © AHHA 2020 Open Access CC BY
Abstract
Objective A pilot study to: (1) describe the ability of emergency physicians to provide primary consults at an Australian, major metropolitan, adult emergency department (ED) during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with historical performance; and (2) to identify the effect of system and process factors on productivity.
Methods A retrospective cross-sectional description of shifts worked between 1 and 29 February 2020, while physicians were carrying out their usual supervision, flow and problem-solving duties, as well as undertaking additional COVID-19 preparation, was documented. Effect of supervisory load, years of Australian registration and departmental flow factors were evaluated. Descriptive statistical methods were used and regression analyses were performed.
Results A total of 188 shifts were analysed. Productivity was 4.07 patients per 9.5-h shift (95% CI 3.56–4.58) or 0.43 patients per h, representing a 48.5% reduction from previously published data (P < 0.0001). Working in a shift outside of the resuscitation area or working a day shift was associated with a reduction in individual patient load. There was a 2.2% (95% CI: 1.1–3.4, P < 0.001) decrease in productivity with each year after obtaining Australian medical registration. There was a 10.6% (95% CI: 5.4–15.6, P < 0.001) decrease in productivity for each junior physician supervised. Bed access had no statistically significant effect on productivity.
Conclusions Emergency physicians undertake multiple duties. Their ability to manage their own patients varies depending on multiple ED operational factors, particularly their supervisory load. COVID-19 preparations reduced their ability to see their own patients by half.
What is known about the topic? An understanding of emergency physician productivity is essential in planning clinical operations. Medical productivity, however, is challenging to define, and is controversial to measure. Although baseline data exist, few studies examine the effect of patient flow and supervision requirements on the emergency physician’s ability to perform primary consults. No studies describe these metrics during COVID-19.
What does this paper add? This pilot study provides a novel cross-sectional description of the effect of COVID-19 preparations on the ability of emergency physicians to provide direct patient care. It also examines the effect of selected system and process factors in a physician’s ability to complete primary consults.
What are the implications for practitioners? When managing an emergency medical workforce, the contribution of emergency physicians to the number of patients requiring consults should take into account the high volume of alternative duties required. Increasing alternative duties can decrease primary provider tasks that can be completed. COVID-19 pandemic preparation has significantly reduced the ability of emergency physicians to manage their own patients.
Additional keywords: clinical services, health services management, performance and evaluation, workforce.
References
[1] Joseph JW, Davis S, Wilker EH, Wong ML, Litvak O, Traub SJ, Nathanson LA, Sanchez LD. Modelling attending physician productivity in the emergency department: a multicentre study. Emerg Med J 2018; 35 317–22.| Modelling attending physician productivity in the emergency department: a multicentre study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29545355PubMed |
[2] Schreck DM, Rothman J. The measurement of productivity in an emergency medicine group practice. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 44 S18
| The measurement of productivity in an emergency medicine group practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Azan B, Innes ME, Thoma B, Lin M, Van Duyvendyk A, Poonja Z, Chan TM. How I work smarter: a qualitative analysis of emergency physicians’ strategies for clinical and non-clinical productivity. Cureus 2019; 11 e4499
| How I work smarter: a qualitative analysis of emergency physicians’ strategies for clinical and non-clinical productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31249761PubMed |
[4] Kee R, Knott JC, Dreyfus S, Lederman R, Milton S, Joe K. One hundred tasks an hour: an observational study of emergency department consultant activities. Emerg Med Australas 2012; 24 294–302.
| One hundred tasks an hour: an observational study of emergency department consultant activities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22672170PubMed |
[5] Walker K, Ben-Meir M, Dunlop W, Rosler R, West A, O’Connor G, Chan T, Badcock D, Putland M, Hansen K, Crock C, Liew D, Taylor D, Staples M. Impact of scribes on emergency medicine doctors’ productivity and patient throughput: multicentre randomised trial. BMJ 2019; 364 l121
| Impact of scribes on emergency medicine doctors’ productivity and patient throughput: multicentre randomised trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30700408PubMed |
[6] Walker K, Ben-Meir M, O’Mullane P, Phillips D, Staples M. Scribes in an Australian private emergency department: a description of physician productivity. Emerg Med Australas 2014; 26 543–8.
| Scribes in an Australian private emergency department: a description of physician productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25330990PubMed |
[7] Walker KJ, Ben-Meir M, Phillips D, Staples M. Medical scribes in emergency medicine produce financially significant productivity gains for some, but not all emergency physicians. Emerg Med Australas 2016; 28 262–7.
| Medical scribes in emergency medicine produce financially significant productivity gains for some, but not all emergency physicians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26954293PubMed |
[8] Arya R, Salovich DM, Ohman-Strickland P, Merlin MA. Impact of scribes on performance indicators in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2010; 17 490–4.
| Impact of scribes on performance indicators in the emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20536801PubMed |
[9] Hess JJ, Wallenstein J, Ackerman JD, Akhter M, Ander D, Keadey MT, Capes JP. Scribe impacts on provider experience, operations, and teaching in an academic emergency medicine practice. West J Emerg Med 2015; 16 602–10.
| Scribe impacts on provider experience, operations, and teaching in an academic emergency medicine practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26587079PubMed |
[10] Heaton HA, Nestler DM, Lohse CM, Sadosty AT. Impact of scribes on emergency department patient throughput one year after implementation. Am J Emerg Med 2017; 35 311–4.
| Impact of scribes on emergency department patient throughput one year after implementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27856140PubMed |
[11] Shuaib W, Hilmi J, Caballero J, Rashid I, Stanazai H, Tawfeek K, Amari A, Ajanovic A, Moshtaghi A, Khurana A, Hasabo H, Baqais A, Szczerba AJ, Gaeta TJ. Impact of a scribe program on patient throughput, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction in a community-based emergency department. Health Informatics J 2019; 25 216–24.
| Impact of a scribe program on patient throughput, physician productivity, and patient satisfaction in a community-based emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28438104PubMed |
[12] Walker K. Increased duties of emergency physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. Melbourne: Monash University; 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26180/5f0960c5d30e5 [verified 14 August 2020].
[13] Lim A. Emergency physician productivity study R code. San Francisco: Github; 2020. Available at: https://github.com/asel0211/EPhysicianProductivity [verified 14 August 2020].
[14] Joseph JW, Henning DJ, Strouse CS, Chiu DT, Nathanson LA, Sanchez LD. Modeling hourly resident productivity in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 70 185–90.e6.
| Modeling hourly resident productivity in the emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28110994PubMed |
[15] Lim A, Barua R, Hong W, Lim A. Using the national time presentation curve to guide staffing. Emerg Med Australas 2020; 32 532–33.
| Using the national time presentation curve to guide staffing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32279442PubMed |
[16] Brennan DF, Silvestri S, Sun JY, Papa L. Progression of emergency medicine resident productivity. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14 790–4.
| Progression of emergency medicine resident productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17726123PubMed |
[17] Dowd MD, Tarantino C, Barnett TM, Fitzmaurice L, Knapp JF. Resident efficiency in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12 1240–4.
| Resident efficiency in a pediatric emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16293898PubMed |
[18] Bhat R, Dubin J, Maloy K. Impact of learners on emergency medicine attending physician productivity. West J Emerg Med 2014; 15 41–4.
| Impact of learners on emergency medicine attending physician productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24578767PubMed |
[19] Heifetz RA, Heifetz R. Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1994.