Private versus public? Examining hospital use by a privately insured population in New South Wales, Australia, using data linkage
Joanna Khoo
A B C , Helen Hasan A and Kathy Eagar A B
A Australian Health Services Research Institute, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. Email: hasan@uow.edu.au; keagar@uow.edu.au
B CMCRC Health Market Quality Research Program, Level 3, 55 Harrington Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: jkhoo@cmcrc.com
Australian Health Review - https://doi.org/10.1071/AH19274
Submitted: 3 December 2019 Accepted: 28 April 2020 Published online: 5 October 2020
Abstract
Objective To examine hospital use characteristics of a privately insured cohort including hospital setting (public or private), declared insurance status and category of services received during hospital admission.
Methods The study population consisted of 14 276 people with membership of a private health insurance (PHI) fund in New South Wales, Australia. The final study cohort included 9004 people with at least one hospital admission over a 6-year period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2015. PHI claims data were linked with public hospital records from a Local Health District. Hospital utilisation measures include number of admissions and length of stay. Measures were categorised by hospital user group (public only, private only or both), declared insurance status (PHI or public patient), type of service and admission case weight.
Results The study finds that despite having PHI, 40% of people receive services exclusively in a public hospital in the 6-year study period. Additionally, only 62% of overnight hospital admissions for the study population are claimed on PHI. There are differences in hospital utilisation for medical- and surgical-related admissions. Seventy percent of people with a medical admission receive services only in public hospitals, but a similar proportion of people (66%) receive services only in private hospitals for surgical admissions.
Conclusions People with PHI make considerable use of public hospitals both as a public and a private patient. For this privately insured cohort, public hospitals are more frequently used for medical-related admissions and also for more resource-intensive admissions compared with private hospitals.
What is known about the topic? There are multiple government incentives to encourage people to take out PHI policies in Australia. Although PHI is closely associated with private hospital utilisation, people with PHI can still use public hospitals as either a public patient, in which the service is fully government-funded, or as a private patient in which PHI contributes funding towards the cost of hospital admissions.
What does this paper add? This study provides the first analysis of hospital utilisation of a privately insured cohort in Australia that reports on the interaction between public and private hospital use and declared insurance status, including utilisation differences based on service type.
What are the implications for practitioners? Although there are financial incentives offered by the Australian Government to encourage uptake of PHI, the study findings show that people with PHI still make considerable use of public hospitals both as a public and private patient. Future policy reforms relating to the regulation of PHI in Australia should consider the nuanced differences in the way people with PHI use public and private hospitals to optimise resource allocation.
References
[1] Ellis RP, Savage E. Run for cover now or later? The impact of premiums, threats and deadlines on private health insurance in Australia. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2008; 8 257–77.| 18568433PubMed |
[2] Commonwealth of Australia. Budget strategy and outlook: Budget paper 1: 2017–2018. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2017.
[3] Colombo F, Tapay N. Private health insurance in Australia: a case study. Paris: OECD; 2003.
[4] Elliot A. The best friend Medicare ever had? Policy narratives and changes in Coalition health policy. Health Sociol Rev 2006; 15 132–43.
| The best friend Medicare ever had? Policy narratives and changes in Coalition health policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] García-Goñi M, Fouda A, Calder RV, Paolucci F. A new funding model for a chronic-care focused healthcare system in Australia. Health Pol Tech 2018; 7 293–301.
| A new funding model for a chronic-care focused healthcare system in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Private health insurance use in Australian hospitals, 2006–07 to 2015–16: Australian hospital statistics. Health Services Series no. 81. Cat. no. HSE 196. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2017.
[7] Martins JM. Private health insurance and hospital services in Australia. Asia Pac J Health Manage 2009; 4 15–24.
[8] NSW Health Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District. About us. Wollongong: NSW Health; 2019. Available at: https://www.islhd.health.nsw.gov.au/about-us [verified 23 February 2020].
[9] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Find hospitals. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2020. Available at: https://www.myhospitals.gov.au/search/hospitals [verified 23 February 2020].
[10] Coordinaire – South Eastern NSW PHN. About South Eastern NSW. Wollongong: Coordinaire; 2020. Available at: https://www.coordinare.org.au/about-us/our-region/about-south-eastern-nsw/ [verified 23 February 2020].
[11] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Older Australians at a glance. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australia-at-a-glance/contents/demographics-of-older-australians [verified 23 February 2020].
[12] Australian Health Services Research Institute. Centre for Health Research Illawarra Shoalhaven Population, IHIP data. Wollongong: AHSRI; 2018. Available at: https://ahsri.uow.edu.au/chrisp/ihip-data/index.html [verified 21 December 2018].
[13] Kelman CW, Bass AJ, Holman CD. Research use of linked health data–a best practice protocol. Aust N Z J Public Health 2002; 26 251–5.
| Research use of linked health data–a best practice protocol.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12141621PubMed |
[14] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Admitted patient care 2014–15: Australian hospital statistics. Health services series no. 68. Cat. no. HSE 172. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2016.
[15] Independent Hospital Pricing Authority. National Hospital Cost Data Collection (NHCDC). Sydney: IHPA; 2018. Available at: https://www.ihpa.gov.au/what-we-do/nhcdc [verified 21 December 2018].
[16] Independent Hospital Pricing Authority. National Hospital Cost Data Collection, AR-DRG Cost Weight tables V6.0x, Round 17 (Financial year 2012–13), Sydney: IHPA; 2013. Available at: https://www.ihpa.gov.au/publications/round-17-nhcdc-cost-weight-tables-v60x-drg [verified 6 November 2018].
[17] Australian Consortium for Classification Development. Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups version 6. Sydney: University of Sydney; 2018. Available at: https://www.accd.net.au/Downloads.aspx [verified 6 November 2018].
[18] Cheng TC, Palangkaraya A, Yong J. Hospital utilization in mixed public–private system: evidence from Australian hospital data. Appl Econ 2014; 46 859–70.
| Hospital utilization in mixed public–private system: evidence from Australian hospital data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Gu M, Johar M. Profiling hospital utilization in a mixed public–private system. Appl Econ 2017; 49 361–75.
| Profiling hospital utilization in a mixed public–private system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] O’Loughlin M. Conflicting interests in private hospital care. Aust Health Rev 2002; 25 106–17.
| Conflicting interests in private hospital care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12474506PubMed |
[21] Reid A, Peters S, Felipe N, Lenguerrand E, Harding S. The impact of migration on deaths and hospital admissions from work-related injuries in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2016; 40 49–54.
| The impact of migration on deaths and hospital admissions from work-related injuries in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26122013PubMed |
[22] Davey M. Market failure: private health insurance only worth it for ‘the pregnant, the rich and the sick’. Melbourne: The Guardian; 2016. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/nov/17/market-failure-private-health-insurance-only-worth-it-for-the-pregnant-the-rich-and-the-sick [verified 21 December 2018].
