Socioeconomic differences in access to care in Australia for women fearful of birth
Jocelyn Toohill A , Emily Callander B , Haylee Fox B D , Daniel Lindsay B , Jenny Gamble A , Debra Creedy A and Jennifer Fenwick A CA School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, 68 University Dr, Meadowbrook, Qld 4131, Australia. Email: j.toohill@griffith.edu.au; j.gamble@griffith.edu.au; d.creedy@griffith.edu.au
B Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Building 48, Douglas Campus, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia. Email: emily.callander@jcu.edu.au; daniel.lindsay1@jcu.edu.au
C Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport Qld 4215, Australia. Email: j.fenwick@griffith.edu.au
D Corresponding author. Email: haylee.fox@jcu.edu.au
Australian Health Review 43(6) 639-643 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17271
Submitted: 23 November 2017 Accepted: 12 June 2018 Published: 25 September 2018
Abstract
Objective Fear of childbirth is known to increase a woman’s likelihood of having a Caesarean section. Continuity of midwifery care is known to reduce this risk, but less than 8% of women have access to this relationship-based, primary care model. The aims of this study were to determine whether healthcare use and access to continuity models are equal across different indicators of socioeconomic status for women who are fearful of birth.
Methods A secondary analysis was conducted of data obtained during a randomised controlled trial of a psychoeducation intervention by trained midwives to minimise childbirth fear (the Birth Emotions and Looking to Improve Expectant Fear (BELIEF) study). In all, 1410 women were screened, with 339 women reporting high levels of fear (Wijma-Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire ≥66). Demographic, obstetric information, birth preference and psychosocial measures were collected at recruitment and at 36 weeks gestation for the 339 fearful women, with the birth method and health service use returned by 183 women at 6 weeks after the birth.
Results Univariate analysis revealed no significant difference in the number of general practitioner and midwife visits between women of high and low income and high and low education. However, women with higher levels of education had 2.51-fold greater odds of seeing the same midwife throughout their pregnancy than women with lower education (95% confidence interval 1.25–5.04), after adjusting for age, parity and hospital site.
Conclusions Given the known positive outcomes of continuity of midwifery care for women fearful of birth, health policy makers need to provide equity in access to evidence-based models of midwifery care.
What is known about this topic? Caseload midwifery care is considered the gold standard care due to the known positive outcomes it has for the mother and baby during the perinatal period. Pregnant women who receive caseload midwifery care are more likely to experience a normal vaginal birth.
What does this paper add? There is unequal access to midwifery caseload care for women fearful of birth across socioeconomic boundaries. Midwifery caseload care is not used for all fearful mothers during the perinatal period.
What are the implications for practitioners? Health policy makers seeking to provide equity in access to maternity care should be aware of these inequalities in use to target delivery of care at this specific cohort of mothers.
References
[1] Sapountzi‐Krepia D, Tsaloglidou A, Psychogiou M, Lazaridou C, Vehvilainen Julkunen K. Mothers’ experiences of pregnancy, labour and childbirth: a qualitative study in northern Greece. Int J Nurs Pract 2011; 17 583–90.| Mothers’ experiences of pregnancy, labour and childbirth: a qualitative study in northern Greece.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Toohill J, Fenwick J, Gamble J, Creedy DK. Prevalence of childbirth fear in an Australian sample of pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14 275
| Prevalence of childbirth fear in an Australian sample of pregnant women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Kjærgaard H, Wijma K, Dykes AK, Alehagen S. Fear of childbirth in obstetrically low‐risk nulliparous women in Sweden and Denmark. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2008; 26 340–50.
| Fear of childbirth in obstetrically low‐risk nulliparous women in Sweden and Denmark.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Haines HM, Rubertsson C, Pallant JF, Hildingsson I. The influence of women’s fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012; 12 55
| The influence of women’s fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Ryding E-L. Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent Caesarean section and experience of childbirth. BJOG 2006; 113 638–46.
| Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent Caesarean section and experience of childbirth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Laursen M, Johansen C, Hedegaard M. Fear of childbirth and risk for birth complications in nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort. BJOG 2009; 116 1350–5.
| Fear of childbirth and risk for birth complications in nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Stoll K, Edmonds JK, Hall WA. Fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean delivery among young American women before childbirth: a survey study. Birth 2015; 42 270–6.
| Fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean delivery among young American women before childbirth: a survey study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Ryding EL, Wijma B, Wijma K, Rydhström H. Fear of childbirth during pregnancy may increase the risk of emergency cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77 542–7.
| Fear of childbirth during pregnancy may increase the risk of emergency cesarean section.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Ryding EL, Lukasse M, Kristjansdottir H, Steingrimsdottir T, Schei B. Pregnant women’s preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth – a six-country cohort study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 37 75–83.
| Pregnant women’s preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth – a six-country cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Fenwick J, Gamble J, Nathan E, Bayes S, Hauck Y. Pre‐ and postpartum levels of childbirth fear and the relationship to birth outcomes in a cohort of Australian women. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18 667–77.
| Pre‐ and postpartum levels of childbirth fear and the relationship to birth outcomes in a cohort of Australian women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Johnson R, Slade P. Does fear of childbirth during pregnancy predict emergency Caesarean section? BJOG 2002; 109 1213–21.
| Does fear of childbirth during pregnancy predict emergency Caesarean section?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Størksen HT, Garthus-Niegel S, Adams SS, Vangen S, Eberhard-Gran M. Fear of childbirth and elective Caesarean section: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15 221
| Fear of childbirth and elective Caesarean section: a population-based study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s mothers and babies 2013. Report no. 9781740248655. Sydney: AIHW; 2015.
[14] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Maternal and perinatal data. Canberra: AIHW; 2017.
[15] Homer CS. Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care. Med J Aust 2016; 205 370–4.
| Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Gu C, Wu X, Ding Y, Zhu X, Zhang Z. The effectiveness of a Chinese midwives’ antenatal clinic service on childbirth outcomes for primipare: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2013; 50 1689–97.
| The effectiveness of a Chinese midwives’ antenatal clinic service on childbirth outcomes for primipare: a randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Fenwick J, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Buist A, Turkstra E, Sneddon A, Scuffham PA, Ryding EL, Jarrett V, Toohill J. Study protocol for reducing childbirth fear: a midwife-led psycho-education intervention. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13 190
| Study protocol for reducing childbirth fear: a midwife-led psycho-education intervention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, Farrell T, Gold L, Biro M, Albers L, Flood M, Oats J, Waldenström U. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2012; 119 1483–92.
| Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Homer CS, Davis GK, Brodie PM, Sheehan A, Barclay LM, Wills J, Chapman MG. Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community‐based continuity of care with standard hospital care. BJOG 2001; 108 16–22.
| Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community‐based continuity of care with standard hospital care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Tracy SK, Welsh A, Hall B, Hartz D, Lainchbury A, Bisits A, White J, Tracy MB. Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14 46
| Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016 CD004667
| Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Toohill J, Callander E, Gamble J, Creedy D, Fenwick J. A cost effectiveness analysis of midwife psycho-education for fearful pregnant women – a health system perspective for the antenatal period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17 217
| A cost effectiveness analysis of midwife psycho-education for fearful pregnant women – a health system perspective for the antenatal period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. National maternity services plan: 2014–15 annual report. Canberra: Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council; 2016.
[24] Toohill J, Fenwick J, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Buist A, Turkstra E, Ryding EL. A randomized controlled trial of a psycho‐education intervention by midwives in reducing childbirth fear in pregnant women. Birth 2014; 41 384–94.
| A randomized controlled trial of a psycho‐education intervention by midwives in reducing childbirth fear in pregnant women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Turkstra E, Mihala G, Scuffham PA, Creedy DK, Gamble J, Toohill J, Fenwick J. An economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial on psycho-education counselling intervention offered by midwives to address women’s fear of childbirth in Australia. Sex Reprod Healthc 2017; 11 1–6.
| An economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial on psycho-education counselling intervention offered by midwives to address women’s fear of childbirth in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Fenwick J, Toohill J, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Buist A, Turkstra E, Sneddon A, Scuffham PA, Ryding EL. Effects of a midwife psycho-education intervention to reduce childbirth fear on women’s birth outcomes and postpartum psychological wellbeing. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15 284
| Effects of a midwife psycho-education intervention to reduce childbirth fear on women’s birth outcomes and postpartum psychological wellbeing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Wijma K, Wijma B, Zar M. Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ; a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 19 84–97.
| Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ; a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Hagenaars AJ, De Vos K, Asghar Zaidi M. Poverty statistics in the late 1980s: research based on micro-data. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1994.
[29] Queensland Government. Logan & Redlands: regional roadmap 2013–2016. Logan Central: Queensland Government; 2016.
[30] Berkman LF, Kawachi I, Glymour MM. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
[31] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s health 2016. Report no. AUS 199. Canberra: AIHW; 2016.
[32] Maxwell S, Brameld K, Bower C, Dickinson JE, Goldblatt J, Hadlow N, Hewitt B, Murch A, Murphy A, Stock R, O’Leary P. Socio-demographic disparities in the uptake of prenatal screening and diagnosis in Western Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 51 9–16.
| Socio-demographic disparities in the uptake of prenatal screening and diagnosis in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Government of Western Australia. Midwifery continuity of carer model toolkit. Perth: Department of Health, State of Western Australia, 2016.
[34] New South Wales Ministry of Health. Midwifery continuity of carer model tool-kit. Sydney: New South Wales Ministry of Health; 2012.
[35] Australian Government. Closing the gap. Canberra: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet; 2017.
[36] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Improving the accessibility of health services in urban and regional settings for Indigenous people. Canberra: AIHW; 2013.
