‘Why didn’t you write a not-for-cardiopulmonary resuscitation order?’ Unexpected death or failure of process?
Michele Levinson A B D , Amber Mills A , Jonathan Barrett C , Gaya Sritharan A and Anthea Gellie AA Cabrini-Monash Department of Medicine, Cabrini Institute for Research and Education, 154 Wattletree Road, Malvern, Vic. 3144, Australia. Email: AMills@cabrini.com.au; GSritharan@cabrini.com.au; AGellie@cabrini.com.au
B Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3068, Australia.
C Intensive Care Unit, Epworth Healthcare, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia. Email: jbarrett29@me.com
D Corresponding author. Email: mlevinson@cabrini.com.au
Australian Health Review 42(1) 53-58 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16140
Submitted: 4 July 2016 Accepted: 11 November 2016 Published: 16 December 2016
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to understand the reasons for the delivery of non-beneficial cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempts in a tertiary private hospital over 12 months. We determined doctors’ expectations of survival after CPR for their patient, whether they had considered a not-for-resuscitation (NFR) order and the barriers to completion of NFR orders.
Methods Anonymous questionnaires were sent to the doctors primarily responsible for a given patient’s care in the hospital within 2 weeks of the unsuccessful CPR attempt. The data were analysed quantitatively where appropriate and qualitatively for themes for open-text responses
Results Most doctors surveyed in the present study understood the poor outcome after CPR in the older person. Most doctors had an expectation that their own patient had a poor prognosis and a poor likely predicted outcome after CPR. This implied that the patient’s death was neither unexpected nor likely to be reversible. Some doctors considered NFR orders, but multiple barriers to completion were cited, including the family’s wishes, being time poor and diffusion or deferral of responsibility.
Conclusions It is likely that futile CPR is provided contrary to policy and legal documents relating to end-of-life care, with the potential for harms relating to both patient and family, and members of resuscitation teams. The failure appears to relate to process rather than recognition of poor patient outcome.
What is known about the topic? Mandatory CPR has been established in Australian hospitals on the premise that it will save lives. The outcome from in-hospital cardiac arrest has not improved despite significant training and resources. The outcome for those acutely hospitalised patients aged over 80 years has been repeatedly demonstrated to be poor with significant morbidity in the survivors. There is emerging literature on the extent of the delivery of non-beneficial treatments at the end of life, including futile CPR, the recognition of harms incurred by patients, families and members of the resuscitation teams and on the opportunity cost of the inappropriate use of resources.
What does this paper add? This is the first study, to our knowledge, that has demonstrated that doctors understood the outcomes for CPR, particularly in those aged 80 years and older, and that failure to recognise poor outcome and prognosis in their own patients is not a barrier to writing NFR orders.
What are the implications for practitioners? Recognition of the poor outcomes from CPR for the elderly patient for whom the doctor has a duty of care should result in a discussion with the patients, allowing an exploration of values and expectations of treatment. This would promote shared decision making, which includes the use of CPR. Facilitation of these discussions should be the focus of health service review.
References
[1] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australian hospital statistics 2011–12. Health Services Series 50. Catalogue no. HSE 134. Canberra: AIHW; 2013. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129543133 [verified 22 September 2015].[2] Australian Resuscitation Council. The ARC guidelines. 2016. Available at: https://resus.org.au/guidelines/ [verified 3 October 2016].
[3] Stapleton RD, Ehlenbach WJ, Deyo RA, Curtis JR. Long-term outcomes after in-hospital CPR in older adults with chronic illness. Chest J 2014; 146 1214–25.
| Long-term outcomes after in-hospital CPR in older adults with chronic illness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Lidhoo P. Evaluating the effectiveness of CPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Hospice Palliative Med 2013; 30 279–82.
| Evaluating the effectiveness of CPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Ebell MH, Jang W, Shen Y, Geocadin RG. Get with the guidelines – resuscitation I. Development and validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score to predict neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA 2013; 173 1872–8.
[6] Nolan JP, Soar J, Smith GB, Gwinnutt C, Parrott F, Power S, et al Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Resuscitation 2014; 85 987–92.
| Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Paniagua D, Lopez-Jimenez F, Londono JC, Mangione CM, Fleischmann K, Lamas GA. Outcome and cost-effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation after in-hospital cardiac arrest in octogenarians. Cardiology 2002; 97 6–11.
| Outcome and cost-effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation after in-hospital cardiac arrest in octogenarians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] van Gijn MS, Frijns D, Van de Glind EM, van Munster BC, Hamaker ME. The chance of survival and the functional outcome after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older people: a systematic review. Age Ageing 2014; 43 456–63.
| The chance of survival and the functional outcome after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older people: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Epidemiology and outcomes of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the United States, 2000–2009. Resuscitation 2013; 84 1255–60.
| Epidemiology and outcomes of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the United States, 2000–2009.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Ehlenbach WJ, Barnato AE, Curtis JR, Kreuter W, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA, et al Epidemiologic study of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 22–31.
| Epidemiologic study of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXotVOqtb0%3D&md5=86c0b212d9fa24d9ff059fe7430d9eadCAS |
[11] Cardona-Morrell M, Kim J, Turner R, Anstey M, Mitchell I, Hillman K. Non-beneficial treatments in hospital at the end of life: a systematic review on extent of the problem. Int J Qual Health Care 2016; 28 456–69.
| Non-beneficial treatments in hospital at the end of life: a systematic review on extent of the problem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2s7ks1ensw%3D%3D&md5=5c0c4afb4ce90018dc2fca365dc517edCAS |
[12] Willmott L, White B, Gallois C, Parker M, Graves N, Winch S, et al Reasons doctors provide futile treatment at the end of life: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics 2016; 42 496–503.
| Reasons doctors provide futile treatment at the end of life: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Visser M, Deliens L, Houttekier D. Physician-related barriers to communication and patient-and family-centred decision-making towards the end of life in intensive care: a systematic review. Crit Care 2014; 18 604
| Physician-related barriers to communication and patient-and family-centred decision-making towards the end of life in intensive care: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Corley MC, Elswick RK, Gorman M, Clor T. Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale. J Adv Nurs 2001; 33 250–6.
| Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3isFyqtw%3D%3D&md5=5b21f297aad4e2d407a4f42c3961d96fCAS |
[15] Mobley MJ, Rady MY, Verheijde JL, Patel B, Larson JS. The relationship between moral distress and perception of futile care in the critical care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2007; 23 256–63.
| The relationship between moral distress and perception of futile care in the critical care unit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Levinson M, Ho S, Mills A, Kelly B, Gellie A, Rouse A. Language and understanding of cardiopulmonary resuscitation amongst an aged inpatient population. Psychol Health Med 2016;
| Language and understanding of cardiopulmonary resuscitation amongst an aged inpatient population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Gellie A, Mills A, Levinson M, Stephenson G, Flynn E. Death: a foe to be conquered? Questioning the paradigm. Age Ageing 2015; 44 7–10.
| Death: a foe to be conquered? Questioning the paradigm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Jones GK, Brewer KL, Garrison HG. Public expectations of survival following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med 2000; 7 48–53.
| Public expectations of survival following cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fis1Witg%3D%3D&md5=28dd7bee9a68fca0b7dcf816a7758fb4CAS |
[19] Sharp T, Moran E, Kuhn I, Barclay S. Do the elderly have a voice? Advance care planning discussions with frail and older individuals: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. Br J Gen Pract 2013; 63 657–68.
| Do the elderly have a voice? Advance care planning discussions with frail and older individuals: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Kaldjian LC, Erekson ZD, Haberle TH, Curtis AE, Shinkunas LA, Cannon KT, et al Code status discussions and goals of care among hospitalised adults. J Med Ethics 2009; 35 338–42.
| Code status discussions and goals of care among hospitalised adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzoslKjtg%3D%3D&md5=2ce3c9522db98192d02c4a5fe1e94d65CAS |
[21] Ehlenbach WJ, Barnato AE, Curtis JR, Kreuter W, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA, et al The epidemiology of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older adults: 1992–2005. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 22–31.
| The epidemiology of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older adults: 1992–2005.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXotVOqtb0%3D&md5=86c0b212d9fa24d9ff059fe7430d9eadCAS |
[22] Hawkins NA, Ditto PH, Danks JH, Smucker WD. Micromanaging death: process preferences, values, and goals in end-of-life medical decision making. Gerontologist 2005; 45 107–17.
| Micromanaging death: process preferences, values, and goals in end-of-life medical decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Blinderman CD, Krakauer EL, Solomon MZ. Time to revise the approach to determining cardiopulmonary resuscitation status. JAMA 2012; 307 917–18.
| Time to revise the approach to determining cardiopulmonary resuscitation status.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XksVKgs7c%3D&md5=53fdd9c8f9c8059e86a028dd4201ef52CAS |
[24] Australian Medical Association (AMA). Position statement. Position statement on end of life care and advance care planning 2014. Canberra: AMA; 2014. Available at: https://ama.com.au/system/tdf/documents/AMA_position_statement_on_end_of_life_care_and_advance_care_planning_2014.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=40573 [verified 25 November 2016].
[25] Murata A, Nakamura T, Karwowski W. Influence of cognitive biases in distorting decision making and leading to critical unfavorable incidents. Safety 2015; 1 44–58.
| Influence of cognitive biases in distorting decision making and leading to critical unfavorable incidents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Christakis NA, Lamont EB. Extent and determinants of error in doctors’ prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2000; 320 469–72.
| Extent and determinants of error in doctors’ prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ktlKisQ%3D%3D&md5=d967a29897a82476ccce277b7b37c561CAS |
[27] Agledahl KM, Gulbrandsen P, Førde R, Wifstad Å. Courteous but not curious: how doctors’ politeness masks their existential neglect. A qualitative study of video-recorded patient consultations. J Med Ethics 2011; 37 650–4.
| Courteous but not curious: how doctors’ politeness masks their existential neglect. A qualitative study of video-recorded patient consultations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] White B, Willmott L, Close E, Shepherd N, Gallois C, Parker MH, et al What does ‘futility’ mean? An empirical study of doctors’ perceptions. Med J Aust 2016; 204 318
| What does ‘futility’ mean? An empirical study of doctors’ perceptions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Kolehmainen C, Stahr A, Kaatz A, Brennan M, Vogelman B, Cook J, et al Post-code PTSD symptoms in internal medicine residents who participate in cardiopulmonary resuscitation events: a mixed methods study. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7 475–9.
| Post-code PTSD symptoms in internal medicine residents who participate in cardiopulmonary resuscitation events: a mixed methods study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Cole FL, Slocumb EM, Mastey JM. A measure of critical care nurses’ post-code stress. J Adv Nurs 2001; 34 281–8.
| A measure of critical care nurses’ post-code stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzhsVGhsw%3D%3D&md5=f410136ddc2303a24f58d5051a547c83CAS |
[31] Myint PK, Rivas CA, Bowker LK. In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: trainees’ worst and most memorable experiences. QJM 2010; 103 865–73.
| In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: trainees’ worst and most memorable experiences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cfpsl2kug%3D%3D&md5=0ba9dff6d9d52460992e86fbfec21734CAS |
[32] Huybrechts SA, Druwé P, Keulemans K, Vanhaute W, De Paepe P, Piers R, et al Perception of inappropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a multicentre cross-sectional survey in Flanders. Resuscitation 2015; 96 31–2.
| Perception of inappropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a multicentre cross-sectional survey in Flanders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Elshove-Bolk J, Guttormsen AB, Austlid I. In-hospital resuscitation of the elderly: characteristics and outcome. Resuscitation 2007; 74 372–6.
| In-hospital resuscitation of the elderly: characteristics and outcome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34] Levinson M, Mills A. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation – time for a change in the paradigm? Med J Aust 2014; 201 152–4.
| Cardiopulmonary resuscitation – time for a change in the paradigm?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[35] Nader A, Seneff MG. In-hospital CPR: performing it better but less often. J Intensive Care Med 2009; 24 208–9.
| In-hospital CPR: performing it better but less often.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
