Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds do not reduce length of hospital stay and 28-day re-admission rate among older people hospitalised with acute illness: an Australian study
Elizabeth Huynh A , David Basic A D , Rinaldo Gonzales A and Chris Shanley A B CA University of New South Wales, Aged Care Research Unit, Liverpool Hospital, LMB 7103, Liverpool BC 1871, NSW 2170, Australia. Email: e.huynh@student.unsw.edu.au; Rinaldo.Gonzales@sswahs.nsw.gov.au
B Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Western Sydney University, LMB 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia. Email: c.shanley@westernsydney.edu.au
C Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, PO Box 3151 (Westfields Liverpool), Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: David.Basic@sswahs.nsw.gov.au
Australian Health Review 41(6) 599-605 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16019
Submitted: 27 January 2016 Accepted: 21 September 2016 Published: 25 November 2016
Journal compilation © AHHA 2017 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Objective Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds (SIBR) are being implemented across many hospitals in Australia despite limited evidence of their effectiveness. This study evaluated the effect of SIBR on two interconnected outcomes, namely length of stay (LOS) and 28-day re-admission.
Methods In the present before-after study of 3644 patients, twice-weekly SIBR were implemented on two aged care wards. Although weekly case conferences were shortened during SIBR, all other practices remained unchanged. Demographic, medical and frailty measures were considered in appropriate analyses.
Results There was no significant difference in median (interquartile range) LOS before and during SIBR (8 (5–15) vs 8 (4–15) days respectively; P = 0.51). In an adjusted analysis, SIBR had no effect on LOS (hazard ratio 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.90–1.05). The presence of dementia or delirium, or the ability to speak English, did not modify the effect of SIBR (P > 0.05 for all). Similarly, SIBR had no effect on 28-day re-admission rates (20.3% vs 19.0% before and during SIBR respectively; P = 0.36).
Conclusions Although ineffective interdisciplinary communication is associated with negative outcomes for patients and healthcare services, models of care that aim to improve communication are not necessarily effective in reducing LOS or early re-admission. Clinical services implementing SIBR are encouraged to independently evaluate their effects.
What is known about the topic? Ineffective interdisciplinary communication may harm patients and increase LOS. Only two publications have evaluated the implementation of SIBR, a new model of care that aims to improve interdisciplinary communication and collaboration. One paper reported that SIBR reduced unadjusted LOS and in-hospital mortality, whereas the other found that SIBR improved teamwork, communication and staff efficiency.
What does this paper add? The effect of SIBR among acutely unwell older people on aged care wards is unknown. The present study is the first to evaluate the effects of SIBR in this population. It shows that the implementation of SIBR did not reduce LOS or early re-admission, and suggests that existing communication strategies may have weakened the effects of SIBR.
What are the implications for practitioners? Policies and practice that promote the addition of communication strategies, such as SIBR, may not be effective in all patient populations. More research is needed to determine whether SIBR reduce these and other outcomes, particularly for services with weaker communication frameworks and protocols.
References
[1] Department of Health. Executive summary of creating an interprofessional workforce: an education and training framework for health and social care in England. 2007. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_078593 [verified 26 January 2016].[2] World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. 2010. Available at: http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/framework_action/en/ [verified 11 October 2016].
[3] Martin JS, Ummenhofer W, Manser T, Spirig R. Interprofessional collaboration among nurses and physicians: making a difference in patient outcome. Swiss Med Wkly 2010; 140 w13062
[4] Boev C, Xia Y. Nurse–physician collaboration and hospital-acquired infections in critical care. Crit Care Nurse 2015; 35 66–72.
| Nurse–physician collaboration and hospital-acquired infections in critical care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Manojlovich M, DeCicco B. Healthy work environments, nurse–physician communication, and patients’ outcomes. Am J Crit Care 2007; 16 536–43.
[6] Friedman DM, Berger DL. Improving team structure and communication: a key to hospital efficiency. Arch Surg 2004; 139 1194–8.
| Improving team structure and communication: a key to hospital efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Begue A, Overcash J, Lewis R, Blanchard S, Askew TM, Borden CP, Semos T, Yagodich AD, Ross P. Retrospective study of multidisciplinary rounding on a thoracic surgical oncology unit. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2012; 16 E198–202.
| Retrospective study of multidisciplinary rounding on a thoracic surgical oncology unit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Dutton RP, Cooper C, Jones A, Leone S, Kramer ME, Scalea TM. Daily multidisciplinary rounds shorten length of stay for trauma patients. J Trauma 2003; 55 913–9.
| Daily multidisciplinary rounds shorten length of stay for trauma patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Stein J, Payne C, Methvin A, Bonsall JM, Chadwick L, Clark D, Castle BW, Tong D, Dressler DD. Reorganizing a hospital ward as an accountable care unit. J Hosp Med 2015; 10 36–40.
| Reorganizing a hospital ward as an accountable care unit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Weller J, Boyd M, Cumin D. Teams, tribes and patient safety: overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare. Postgrad Med J 2014; 90 149–54.
| Teams, tribes and patient safety: overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Gausvik C, Lautar A, Miller L, Pallerla H, Schlaudecker J. Structured nursing communication on interdisciplinary acute care teams improves perceptions of safety, efficiency, understanding of care plan and teamwork as well as job satisfaction. J Multidiscip Healthc 2015; 8 33–7.
| Structured nursing communication on interdisciplinary acute care teams improves perceptions of safety, efficiency, understanding of care plan and teamwork as well as job satisfaction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Clinical Excellence Commission. In safe hands. 2016. Available at: http://cec.health.nsw.gov.au/quality-improvement/team-effectiveness/insafehands [verified 11 October 2016].
[13] Thomas JW, Guire KE, Horvat GG. Is patient length of stay related to quality of care? Hosp Health Serv Adm 1997; 42 489–507.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FmtlKjtw%3D%3D&md5=4d5ad33373a2f2e256c833c763015873CAS |
[14] Kossovsky MP, Sarasin FP, Chopard P, Louis-Simonet M, Sigaud P, Perneger TV, Gaspoz JM. Relationship between hospital length of stay and quality of care in patients with congestive heart failure. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11 219–23.
| Relationship between hospital length of stay and quality of care in patients with congestive heart failure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jisFWhuw%3D%3D&md5=4298dc7701383ba5634e0113a9384ba6CAS |
[15] O’Connell TJ, Ben-Tovim DI, McCaughan BC, Szwarcbord MG, McGrath KM. Health services under siege: the case for clinical process redesign. Med J Aust 2008; 188 S9–13.
[16] Heggestad T. Do hospital length of stay and staffing ratio affect elderly patients’ risk of readmission? A nation-wide study of Norwegian hospitals. Health Serv Res 2002; 37 647–65.
| Do hospital length of stay and staffing ratio affect elderly patients’ risk of readmission? A nation-wide study of Norwegian hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Kaboli PJ, Go JT, Hockenberry J, Glasgow JM, Johnson SR, Rosenthal GE, Jones MP, Vaughan-Sarrazin M. Associations between reduced hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission rate and mortality: 14-year experience in 129 Veterans Affairs hospitals. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157 837–45.
| Associations between reduced hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission rate and mortality: 14-year experience in 129 Veterans Affairs hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Bolevich Z, Smith B. Unplanned hospital readmissions. 2015. Available at: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Performance/Documents/201503-unplanned-readmissions.pdf [verified 11 October 2016].
[19] Ashton CM, Del Junco DJ, Souchek J, Wray NP, Mansyur CL. The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission. A meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care 1997; 35 1044–59.
| The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission. A meta-analysis of the evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2svnvVagtw%3D%3D&md5=a1e5553afb5f6b72b02fc6d638de6826CAS |
[20] Franklin PD, Noetscher CM, Murphy ME, Lagoe RJ. Using data to reduce hospital readmissions. J Nurs Care Qual 1999; 14 67–85.
| Using data to reduce hospital readmissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Linertova R, Garcia-Perez L, Vazquez-Diaz JR, Lorenzo-Riera A, Sarria-Santamera A. Interventions to reduce hospital readmissions in the elderly: in-hospital or home care. A systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17 1167–75.
| Interventions to reduce hospital readmissions in the elderly: in-hospital or home care. A systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Wieland D, Rubenstein LZ. What do we know about patient targeting in geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) programs? Aging Clin Exp Res 1996; 8 297–310.
| What do we know about patient targeting in geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) programs?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7hvVenug%3D%3D&md5=872122c206a9baa29945626ac19202caCAS |
[23] Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005; 173 489–95.
| A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups. Hospital casemix protocol 2008-09, number of separations, average length of stay, patient days and average charges, by AR-DRG version 5.1, public hospitals, private hospitals and day surgeries. Available at: https://health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/647C11F217FEDC1FCA257BF0001ED9AF/$File/HCP%20Annual%20Report%200809.pdf [verified 7 October 2016].
[25] Basic D, Shanley C. Frailty in an older inpatient population: using the clinical frailty scale to predict patient outcomes. J Aging Health 2015; 27 670–85.
| Frailty in an older inpatient population: using the clinical frailty scale to predict patient outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Campbell SE, Seymour DG, Primrose WR. A systematic literature review of factors affecting outcome in older medical patients admitted to hospital. Age Ageing 2004; 33 110–15.
| A systematic literature review of factors affecting outcome in older medical patients admitted to hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Lang PO, Heitz D, Hedelin G, Drame M, Jovenin N, Ankri J, Somme D, Novella JL, Gauvain JB, Couturier P, Voisin T, De Waziere B, Gonthier R, Jeandel C, Jolly D, Saint-Jean O, Blanchard F. Early markers of prolonged hospital stays in older people: a prospective, multicenter study of 908 inpatients in French acute hospitals. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54 1031–9.
| Early markers of prolonged hospital stays in older people: a prospective, multicenter study of 908 inpatients in French acute hospitals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] von Renteln-Kruse W, Krause T. Incidence of in-hospital falls in geriatric patients before and after the introduction of an interdisciplinary team-based fall-prevention intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55 2068–74.
| Incidence of in-hospital falls in geriatric patients before and after the introduction of an interdisciplinary team-based fall-prevention intervention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Van Craen K, Braes T, Wellens N, Denhaerynck K, Flamaing J, Moons P, Boonen S, Gosset C, Petermans J, Milisen K. The effectiveness of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58 83–92.
| The effectiveness of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Baztan JJ, Suarez-Garcia FM, Lopez-Arrieta J, Rodriguez-Manas L, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Effectiveness of acute geriatric units on functional decline, living at home, and case fatality among older patients admitted to hospital for acute medical disorders: meta-analysis. BMJ 2009; 338 334–42.
| Effectiveness of acute geriatric units on functional decline, living at home, and case fatality among older patients admitted to hospital for acute medical disorders: meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Bauer M, Fitzgerald L, Haesler E, Manfrin M. Hospital discharge planning for frail older people and their family. Are we delivering best practice? A review of the evidence. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18 2539–46.
| Hospital discharge planning for frail older people and their family. Are we delivering best practice? A review of the evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Clarke A. Length of in-hospital stay and its relationship to quality of care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11 209–10.
| Length of in-hospital stay and its relationship to quality of care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jisFWhtg%3D%3D&md5=0f68a74cc64b756a2fb2299d3a5e2833CAS |
[33] Ensberg MD, Paletta MJ, Galecki AT, Dacko CL, Fries BE. Identifying elderly patients for early discharge after hospitalization for hip fracture. J Gerontol 1993; 48 M187–95.
| Identifying elderly patients for early discharge after hospitalization for hip fracture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3sznsFWluw%3D%3D&md5=83f044db54ec644d3469b4bf1b68375dCAS |
[34] McVeigh C, Cox J. Parkes 5 aged care rehab In Safe Hands unit. Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds (SIBR). 2015. Available at: http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/266710/6-Clinical-Units-Aged-Care-Rehab-POW-Catherine-McVeigh.pdf/ [verified 26 January 2016].
[35] Redley B, Barnes S, Campbell D, Stockman K. Evaluating patient participation in interdisciplinary medical ward rounds. 2014. Available at: http://www.isqua.org/docs/default-source/Brazil-Speakers/Brazil-Power-Point-Presentations/b-redley_isqua-oct_2014_sibr.pdf?sfvrsn=0/ [verified 26 January 2016].
[36] Rowlinson D, Moylan E. In Safe Hands CB4E oncology. 2015. Available at: http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/266717/9-Clinical-Units-Oncology-Liverpool-Debbie-Rowlinson-Eugene-Moylan.pdf/ [verified 26 January 2016].
[37] Wilson S. Our SIBR journey. St Vincent’s Hospital Coronary Care Unit. 2015. Available at: http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/266714/8-Clinical-Units-Oncology-St-Vincents-Stephanie-Wilson.pdf/ [verified 26 January 2016]
[38] Wong CH, Weiss D, Sourial N, Karunananthan S, Quail JM, Wolfson C, Bergman H. Frailty and its association with disability and comorbidity in a community-dwelling sample of seniors in Montreal: a cross-sectional study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2010; 22 54–62.
| Frailty and its association with disability and comorbidity in a community-dwelling sample of seniors in Montreal: a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
