Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Differences in risk and protective factors for workplace aggression between male and female clinical medical practitioners in Australia

Danny J. Hills
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia. Email: danny.hills@monash.edu

Australian Health Review 41(3) 313-320 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16003
Submitted: 6 January 2016  Accepted: 3 May 2016   Published: 23 June 2016

Journal Compilation © AHHA 2017 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the present study was to investigate differences in prevalence, as well as risk and protective factors, for exposure to workplace aggression between male and female clinicians in Australian medical practice settings.

Methods In a cross-sectional, self-report study in the third wave of the Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life survey (2010–11), 16 327 medical practitioners were sampled, with 9449 (57.9%) respondents working in clinical practice. Using backward stepwise elimination, parsimonious logistic regression models were developed for exposure to aggression from external (patients, patients’ relatives or carers and others) and internal (co-workers) sources in the previous 12 months.

Results Overall, greater proportions of female than male clinicians experienced aggression from external (P < 0.001) and internal (P < 0.01) sources in the previous 12 months. However, when stratified by doctor type, greater proportions of male than female general practitioners (GPs) and GP registrars experienced external aggression (P < 0.05), whereas greater proportions of female than male specialists experienced external (P < 0.01) and internal (P < 0.01) aggression. In logistic regression models, differences were identified in relation to age for males and experience working in medicine for females with external and internal aggression; working in New South Wales (vs Victoria) and internal aggression for females; a poor medical support network and external aggression, and perceived unrealistic patient expectations with internal aggression for males; warning signs in reception and waiting areas with external aggression for males; and optimised patient waiting conditions with external and internal aggression for females.

Conclusions Differences in risk and protective factors for exposure to workplace aggression between male and female clinicians, including in relation to state and rural location, need to be considered in the development and implementation of efforts to prevent and minimise workplace aggression in medical practice settings.

What is known about the topic? Workplace aggression is prevalent in clinical medical settings, but there are conflicting reports about sex-based differences in the extent of exposure, and little evidence on differences in risk and protective factors for exposure to workplace aggression.

What does this paper add? Differences in workplace aggression exposure rates between male and female clinicians are highlighted, including when stratified by doctor type. New evidence is reported on differences and similarities in key personal, professional and work-related factors associated with exposure to external and internal aggression.

What are the implications for practitioners? In developing strategies for the prevention and minimisation of workplace aggression, consideration must be given to differences between male and female clinicians, including with regard to personality, age and professional experience, as well as work locations, conditions and settings, as risk or protective factors for exposure to aggression in medical work.

Additional keywords: aggression, gender, medicine, physician.


References

[1]  Hills D, Joyce C. A review of research on the prevalence, antecedents, consequences and prevention of workplace aggression in clinical medical practice. Aggress Violent Behav 2013; 18 554–69.
A review of research on the prevalence, antecedents, consequences and prevention of workplace aggression in clinical medical practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Gerberich SG, Church TR, McGovern PM, Hansen HD, Nachreiner NM, Geisser MS, Ryan AD, Mongin SJ, Watt GD. An epidemiological study of the magnitude and consequences of work related violence: the Minnesota nurses’ study. Occup Environ Med 2004; 61 495–503.
An epidemiological study of the magnitude and consequences of work related violence: the Minnesota nurses’ study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3ltF2msA%3D%3D&md5=6059f344cfcc0dd6b0d3e6bea66e1dbbCAS | 15150388PubMed |

[3]  Hills D, Joyce C, Humphreys J. A national study of workplace aggression in Australian clinical medical practice. Med J Aust 2012; 197 336–40.
A national study of workplace aggression in Australian clinical medical practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22994831PubMed |

[4]  Magin P, Adams J, Sibbritt D, Joy E, Ireland M. Experiences of occupational violence in Australian urban general practice: A cross-sectional study of GPs. Med J Aust 2005; 183 352–6.
| 16201952PubMed |

[5]  Forrest LE, Herath PM, McRae IS, Parker RM. A national survey of general practitioners’ experiences of patient-initiated aggression in Australia. Med J Aust 2011; 194 605–8.
| 21644878PubMed |

[6]  Expert Advisory Group on Discrimination Bullying and Sexual Harassment. Report to the RACS: draft. Melbourne: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons; 2015. Available at: https://www.surgeons.org/media/22045685/EAG-Report-to-RACS-Draft-08-Sept-2015.pdf [verified 6 January 2015].

[7]  Hills DJ, Joyce CM. Personal, professional, and work factors associated with Australian clinical medical practitioners’ experiences of workplace aggression. Ann Occup Hyg 2013; 57 898–912.
Personal, professional, and work factors associated with Australian clinical medical practitioners’ experiences of workplace aggression.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23519949PubMed |

[8]  Hills D, Joyce C. Workplace aggression in clinical medical practice: associations with job satisfaction, life satisfaction and self-rated health. Med J Aust 2014; 201 535–40.
Workplace aggression in clinical medical practice: associations with job satisfaction, life satisfaction and self-rated health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25358579PubMed |

[9]  Hills D. Associations between Australian clinical medical practitioner exposure to workplace aggression and workforce participation intentions. Aust Health Rev 2015; 40 36–42.
Associations between Australian clinical medical practitioner exposure to workplace aggression and workforce participation intentions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Heponiemi T, Kouvonen A, Virtanen M, Vanska J, Elovainio M. The prospective effects of workplace violence on physicians’ job satisfaction and turnover intentions: the buffering effect of job control. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14 19
The prospective effects of workplace violence on physicians’ job satisfaction and turnover intentions: the buffering effect of job control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24438449PubMed |

[11]  Arnetz JE, Arnetz BB. Violence toward health care staff and possible effects on the quality of patient care. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52 417–27.
Violence toward health care staff and possible effects on the quality of patient care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mtFyktw%3D%3D&md5=afba8afecb30b08aa4b3c99b3906be2eCAS | 11330776PubMed |

[12]  Paice E, Smith D. Bullying of trainee doctors is a patient safety issue. Clin Teach 2009; 6 13–7.
Bullying of trainee doctors is a patient safety issue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Buckley P. Violence at work 2013/14: findings from the crime survey for England and Wales. London: Health Service Executive; 2014. Available at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causinj/violence/violence-at-work.pdf [verified 6 January 2015].

[14]  Estrada F, Nilsson A, Jerre K, Wikman S. Violence at work: the emergence of a social problem. J Scand Stud Criminol Crime Prev 2010; 11 46–65.
Violence at work: the emergence of a social problem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Guay S, Goncalves J, Jarvis J. Verbal violence in the workplace according to victims’ sex: a systematic review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav 2014; 19 572–8.
Verbal violence in the workplace according to victims’ sex: a systematic review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Guay S, Goncalves J, Jarvis J. A systematic review of exposure to physical violence across occupational domains according to victims’ sex. Aggress Violent Behav 2015; 25 133–41.
A systematic review of exposure to physical violence across occupational domains according to victims’ sex.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Hills D, Joyce C, Humphreys J. Workplace aggression prevention and minimisation in Australian clinical medical practice settings: a national study. Aust Health Rev 2013; 37 607–13.
Workplace aggression prevention and minimisation in Australian clinical medical practice settings: a national study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24120266PubMed |

[18]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Rural, regional and remote health: a guide to remoteness classifications. Rural health series no. 4, catalogue no. PHE 53. Canberra: AIHW; 2004. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=6442459567 [verified 6 January 2015].

[19]  Pearlin LI, Schooler C. The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav 1978; 19 2–21.
The structure of coping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE1c7nt1WnsA%3D%3D&md5=39386b42ccdb0ba5359c1c1d90fbae1fCAS | 649936PubMed |

[20]  Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.

[21]  Koritsas S, Coles J, Boyle M, Stanley J. Prevalence and predictors of occupational violence and aggression towards GPs: a cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57 967–70.
Prevalence and predictors of occupational violence and aggression towards GPs: a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18252072PubMed |

[22]  Tolhurst H, Baker L, Murray G, Bell P, Sutton A, Dean S. Rural general practitioner experience of work-related violence in Australia. Aust J Rural Health 2003; 11 231–6.
| 14641220PubMed |

[23]  Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee. The general practice workforce in Australia: supply and requirements to 2013. Sydney: Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee; 2005. Available at: https://www.hwa.gov.au/sites/uploads/The general practice workforce in Australia.pdf [verified 6 January 2015].

[24]  Magin PJ, May J, McElduff P, Goode SM, Adams J, Cotter GL. Occupational violence in general practice: a whole-of-practice problem. Results of a cross-sectional study. Aust Health Rev 2011; 35 75–80.
Occupational violence in general practice: a whole-of-practice problem. Results of a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21367335PubMed |

[25]  Hodgson MJ, Reed R, Craig T, Murphy F, Lehmann L, Belton L, Warren N. Violence in healthcare facilities: lessons from the veterans health administration. J Occup Environ Med 2004; 46 1158–65.
Violence in healthcare facilities: lessons from the veterans health administration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15534503PubMed |

[26]  Saeki K, Okamoto N, Tomioka K, Obayashi K, Nishioka H, Ohara K, Kurumatani N. Work-related aggression and violence committed by patients and its psychological influence on doctors. J Occup Health 2011; 53 356–64.
Work-related aggression and violence committed by patients and its psychological influence on doctors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21828959PubMed |

[27]  Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method. 3rd edn. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.